Measures Used to Assess Chronic Pelvic Pain in Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review

Maria Beatriz Cardoso Ferreira, Andréia Moreira de Souza Mitidieri, Júlio C. Rosa e Silva, Omero Benedicto Poli‐Neto, Antônio Alberto Nogueira, Francisco José Cândido dos Reis
In: Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · 2015 · vol. 21(4) , pp. 749–756 · doi:10.1111/jep.12340 · PMID:25809923 · W1855973173
review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This systematic review of 74 clinical trials found that single-item pain assessment scales were most commonly used for chronic pelvic pain, with multidimensional inventories used infrequently.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

RATIONALE: Many types of pain assessment are available to researchers carrying out clinical trials in chronic pelvic pain (CPP), ranging from a single-item scale to multidimensional inventories. AIM: Our objective was to investigate which assessments of pain are more commonly used in clinical trials on CPP. METHOD: We have reviewed articles published between 1991 and 2014. A total of 74 studies out of 1299 original research articles reviewed met the selection criteria by containing at least one method of pain assessment. The selected studies were classified according to the dimensions of pain evaluated, the type of scale and the descriptors used. RESULTS: The instruments most frequently used were single-item VAS and Biberoglu and Behrman pain score, while multidimensional inventories were used in few studies. The results of clinical studies in CPP are more frequently based on one-dimensional measurements. Valuable results from clinical studies in CPP might have been omitted because of incomplete outcome measurements. CONCLUSION: We believe the authors of clinical studies should report their results in a comprehensive way including in the outcomes of the measurement of one-dimensional and multidimensional pain characteristics.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Outcome instruments

VAS-pain Biberoglu-Behrman

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (100)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK