Umbilical Endometriosis: A Systematic Literature Review and Pathogenic Theory Proposal

Dhouha Dridi, Francesça Chiaffarino, Francesca Chiaffarino, Fabio Parazzini, Agnese Donati, Laura Buggio, Massimiliano Brambilla, Giorgio Alberto Croci, Paolo Vercellini
Journal of clinical medicine · 2022 · vol. 11(4) , pp. 995 · doi:10.3390/jcm11040995 · PMID:35207266 · PMC8879338 · W4212833678
review OA: gold CC0 ⤵ 31 in-corpus citations
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This systematic review of 232 umbilical endometriosis cases found it comprises about 20% of abdominal wall lesions, primarily occurs as a primary form, and presents with pain, catamenial symptoms, and bleeding, possibly originating from implanted regurgitated endometrial cells.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Umbilical endometriosis represents 30-40% of abdominal wall endometriosis and around 0.5-1.0% of all cases of endometriosis. The aim of this systematic review is to revisit the epidemiology, signs, and symptoms and to formulate a pathogenic theory based on literature data. We performed a systematic literature review using the PubMed and Embase databases from 1 January 1950 to 7 February 2021, according to the PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021239670). Studies were selected if they reported original data on umbilical endometriosis nodule defined at histopathological examination and described as the presence of endometrial glands and/or stromal cells in the connective tissue. A total of 11 studies (10 retrospective and one prospective), and 14 case series were included in the present review. Overall, 232 umbilical endometriosis cases were reported, with the number per study ranging from 1 to 96. Umbilical endometriosis was observed in 76 (20.9%; 95% CI 17.1-25.4) of the women included in studies reporting information on the total number of cases of abdominal wall endometriosis. Umbilical endometriosis was considered a primary form in 68.4% (158/231, 95% CI 62.1-74.1) of cases. A history of endometriosis and previous abdominal surgery were reported in 37.9% (25/66, 95% CI 27.2-49.9) and 31.0% (72/232, 95% CI 25.4-37.3) of cases, respectively. Pain was described in 83% of the women (137/165, 95% CI 76.6-88.0), followed by catamenial symptoms in 83.5% (142/170, 95% CI, 77.2-88.4) and bleeding in 50.9% (89/175, 95% CI 43.5-58.2). In the 148 women followed for a period ranging from three to 92.5 months, seven (4.7%, 95% CI 2.3-9.4) recurrences were observed. The results of this analysis show that umbilical endometriosis represents about 20% of all the abdominal wall endometriotic lesions and that over two thirds of cases are primary umbilical endometriosis forms. Pain and catamenial symptoms are the most common complaints that suggest the diagnosis. Primary umbilical endometriosis may originate from implantation of regurgitated endometrial cells conveyed by the clockwise peritoneal circulation up to the right hemidiaphragm and funneled toward the umbilicus by the falciform and round liver ligaments.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (70)

Cited by (31)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-13T06:22:48.782012+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:23:57.700195+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK