Abstract
Endometriosis is a condition defined as extrauterine functional endometrial tissue, typically seen on pelvic peritoneal
surfaces, leading to symptoms such as cyclic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and infertility. Extra -pelvic endometriosis is
uncommon, especially the umbilical form. We present an interesting case of primary umbilical endometriosis (Villar’s nod ule) in a
patient with no medical or surgical history, who presented with umbilical pain and bleeding. She was found to have a bluish umbilical
nodule, which was surgically removed and sent to the pathology to confirm the diagnosis. The report aims to highlight the diagnosis
and management of umbilical endometriosis and the possibility of its occurrence even in patients without prior surgical histo ry.
KEY WORDS: Primary Umbilical endometriosis – Umbilical bleeding – Cyclic umbilical swelling – Surgical excision
Introduction
Endometriosis (EM) is a benign gynecological disorder [1] characterized by the presence of functional endometrial tissue outside
the uterus. It frequently affects the pelvic peritoneum, ovaries, or rectovaginal septum. Symptoms vary based on the affected organs
and inflammation level but typically include dysmenorrhea and dyspareunia, with about 20–25% of cases being asymptomatic. This
chronic condition impacts 6 –15% of women of reproductive age and 6% of postmenopausal women, with infertility occurring in
30–50% of affected individuals [2].
Endometriosis in extra-pelvic sites is rare, with less common locations including the diaphragm, lungs, and anterior abdominal wall
[3]. Among patients with endometriosis, 0.5 –1% develop umbilical endometriosis, which can be primary or secondary. Secondary
umbilical endometriosis arises post-laparoscopic procedures, while primary umbilical endometriosis (PUE), first identified by Villar
in 1886, is particularly rare [2].
Here, we present the case of a 36-year-old nulliparous woman with primary umbilical endometriosis.
PRESENTATION OF CASE
A 36-year-old nulliparous woman with no comorbidities or history of abdominal or pelvic surgeries presented to the emergency
room with dysmenorrhea and a sharp, throbbing pain originating from a swelling, bleeding, bluish nodule in the umbilicus (figure
1). The pain began five days prior to admission, and the bleeding started on the day of admission. Her last menstrual period began
four days before admission, and she reported that this condition had been recurring for four years, with symptoms worsening during
menstruation. She did not take oral contraceptive pills and found that analgesics only provided temporary relief. The patient denied
other symptoms such as umbilical/abdominal trauma, fever, chills, vomiting, diarrhea, nor constipation.
Upon admission, her vital signs were within normal limits. Clinical examination revealed multiple ill -defined bluish papules
surrounded by erythematous skin in the inferior aspect of the umbilicus. A gynecological evaluation was normal. Laboratory tests
showed a hemoglobin level of 11.2 g/dL, a platelet count of 264,000/mm³, and a negative blood β -hCG.
Symptomatic Primary Umbilical Endometriosis: A Case Report and A Review of the Literature
IJHMR, Volume 3 Issue 08 August 2024 www.ijhmr.com Page 606
Figure 1: initial physical examination showing 1.5-cm size endometrial implant on the inferior aspect of the umbilicus.
An abdominal wall ultrasound revealed a small collection in the umbilical region with central necrosis, extending 27x10x9 mm,
with a rounded edge and a fistulous path measuring 2.5 mm in diameter and 10 mm in length, limited to the parietal fatty layer. The
diagnosis of endometriosis was suggested based on the cyclical nature of her symptoms.
A pelvic MRI showed a normal -sized uterus, ovaries, and vaginal tract with no endomet rial or cervical thickening and no
laterouterine mass. It revealed an oblong lesion in the pouch of Douglas, measuring 7.4x6 mm, with T2 hypersignal and gadolinium
enhancement, attaching the uterus to the rectum. Additionally, subcutaneous thickening in th e umbilical area with gadolinium
enhancement measured 14.4x24 mm. These findings suggested endometriosis (figure 2).
Figure 2: Pelvic MRI images of the patient showing a subcutaneous hypersignal T2 (red arrow and red circle), referring to
endometriosis in the umbilical area.
The decision was made to treat the affected tissue with radical local excision and umbilical reconstruction. The surgery, per formed
at the end of the menstrual cycle, involved excising the nodule with a 1-cm safety margin up to the rectus fascia and performing an
umbilicoplasty to close the umbilical defect. Pathology confirmed the presence of endometrial implants within the umbilical m ass.
At the postoperative visit, the patient reported satisfaction with the results. She was applying a topical antibiotic and healing cream
to the umbilicus as instructed. Clinical examination showed excellent healing of the umbilicoplasty.
Discussion
Endometriosis is a benign gynecological disorder characterized by the presence of endometrial tissue outside the uterus, often on
pelvic organs such as the ovaries, fallopian tubes, pelvic peritoneum, uterosacral ligaments, and broad ligaments. Approximat ely
12% of endometriosis lesions are extragenital, occurring in locations such as the brain, lungs, gastrointestinal tract, urinary system,
and musculature. Among extragenital sites, the abdominal wall (AWE) is the most common location for endometriosis.
Umbilical endometriosis (UE) involves the presence of endometrial glands and/or stroma within the umbilicus. It is a rare form of
endometriosis, accounting for 30-40% of AWE cases, 0.4-4% of extragenital lesions, and 0.5-1% of all endometriosis cases [1], [4],
[5].
Symptomatic Primary Umbilical Endometriosis: A Case Report and A Review of the Literature
IJHMR, Volume 3 Issue 08 August 2024 www.ijhmr.com Page 607
There are two types of UE:
Primary UE: First described by Villar in 1886, it is also known as Villar’s nodule [6]. Primary UE occurs without a history of
surgery. Its pathogenesis is unclear, but theories include coelomic metaplasia, c ongenital presence of displaced endometrial
tissue, direct extension through the round ligament or the patent omphalo -mesenteric duct, and mechanical seeding of
endometrial tissues via the lymphatic or venous system.
Secondary UE: This type develops on scar tissue following abdominal procedures such as laparoscopy.
Understanding the distinction between primary and secondary UE is important for comprehending the disease's pathogenic
mechanisms. According to Hirata et al. (2020), the risk of malignant transformation of UE is about 3% [2], [5].
Due to its low frequency, limited data are available on the prevalence of primary and secondary UE and the associated symptom s
[1]. Diagnosis of umbilical endometriosis is primarily clinical, with histopathology confirming the diagnosis [3]. Common clinical
symptoms include cyclic, menstrual-related focal abdominal pain, swelling, and bleeding [2]. UE typically presents as a red, purple,
or black umbilical nodule, measuring between 0.5 and 3 cm in diameter [5].
Imaging techniques can improve diagnostic accuracy:
- Ultrasound: Although not specific for an abdominal endometrioma, it may show a mass in the abdominal wall that appears
solid, hypoechoic, and may contain internal vascularity and cystic areas. The differential diagnosis includes neoplasms (sarcoma
or lymphoma), suture granuloma, ventral hernia, abscess, or hematoma.
- CT and MRI: These modalities also show a solid mass in the abdominal wall and are useful for characterizing the extent of the
disease/mass preoperatively, though they cannot definitively diagnose endometriosis.
While ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration can provide a definitive diagnosis, wide surgical excision is recommended for both
diagnosis and treatment of an abdominal wall mass [4].
Surgery may involve resection of the umbilical mass with wide local excision (en -bloc omphalectomy) and, if possible, evaluation
for pelvic endometriosis via laparoscopy. Surgical treatment is strongly recommended despite limited evidence on long -term
efficacy and complications.
Medical treatment, such as combined oral contraceptives or progestins to reduce the stimulation and inflammatory effects of
endometriotic implants, is weakly recommended due to limited supporting data and a lack of comparative studies bet ween medical
and surgical treatments for umbilical endometriosis [1], [3].
Conclusion
The umbilical endometriosis remains a very uncommon condition. However, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis of
umbilical lesions. Our case report is an opportunity to highlight the importance of recognizing UE whenever a case of umbilical
swelling or bleeding and cyclic pain occurs. It is not mandatory, as depicted in our patient, to have a surgical history.
References
1) D. Dridi et al., “Umbilical Endometriosis: A Systematic Literature Review and Pathogenic Theory Proposal,” JCM, vol.
11, no. 4, p. 995, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3390/jcm11040995.
2) D. Boesgaard -Kjer, D. Boesgaard -Kjer, and J. J. Kjer, “Primary umbilical endometrio sis (PUE),” European Journal of
Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, vol. 209, pp. 44 –45, Feb. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.05.030.
3) I. Ogamba, S. Napolitano, L. Chuang, D. August, and K. LaVorgna, “Primary umbilical endometriosis presentin g with
umbilical bleeding: A case report,” Case Reports in Women’s Health, vol. 36, p. e00441, Oct. 2022, doi:
10.1016/j.crwh.2022.e00441.
4) C. Davies, A. M. Davies, L. -G. Kindblom, and S. James, “Soft Tissue Tumors with Muscle Differentiation,” Semin
Musculoskelet Radiol, vol. 14, no. 02, pp. 245–256, Jun. 2010, doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1253165.
5) A. Hamouie, E. Brunn, J. Orzel, S. R. Shehr, and J. K. Robinson, “Joint Treatment of De Novo Umbilical Endometriosis
with Plastic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery”.
6) D. Makena, T. Obura, S. Mutiso, and F. Oindi, “Umbilical endometriosis: a case series,” J Med Case Reports, vol. 14, no.
1, p. 142, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1186/s13256-020-02492-9.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.