Linzagolix therapy versus a placebo in patients with endometriosis-associated pain: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 study (EDELWEISS 3)
rct
OA: gold
CC0
⤵ 18 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
Linzagolix at 200 mg with add-back therapy significantly reduced endometriosis pain, while 75 mg alone significantly reduced only dysmenorrhea compared to placebo.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION: Does linzagolix administered orally once daily for up to 3 months at a dose of 75 mg alone or 200 mg in combination with add-back therapy (ABT) (1.0 mg estradiol; 0.5 mg norethindrone acetate, also known as norethisterone acetate [NETA]) demonstrate better efficacy than placebo in the management of endometriosis-related dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain?
SUMMARY ANSWER: Combining 200 mg linzagolix with ABT was found to significantly reduce dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain at 3 months of therapy, while a daily dose of 75 mg linzagolix yielded a significant decrease only in dysmenorrhea at 3 months.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY?: A previously published Phase 2, dose-finding study reported that at a dose of 200 mg daily, linzagolix promotes full suppression of estradiol secretion to serum levels below 20 pg/ml and noted that the addition of ABT may be needed to manage hypoestrogenic side effects. At lower doses (75 mg and 100 mg/day), linzagolix maintains estradiol values within the target range of 20-60 pg/ml, which could be ideal to alleviate symptoms linked to endometriosis.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: EDELWEISS 3 was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy Phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of linzagolix for the treatment of moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. Treatment was administered orally once daily for up to 6 months.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In the EDELWEISS 3 trial, 486 subjects with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain were randomized at a 1:1:1 ratio to one of the three study groups: placebo, 75 mg linzagolix alone or 200 mg linzagolix in association with ABT. Pain was measured daily on a verbal rating scale and recorded in an electronic diary.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: At 3 months, the daily 200 mg linzagolix dose with ABT met the primary efficacy objective, showing clinically meaningful and statistically significant reductions in dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain, with stable or decreased use of analgesics. The proportion of responders for dysmenorrhea in the 200 mg linzagolix with ABT group was 72.9% compared with 23.5% in the placebo group (P < 0.001), while the rates of responders for non-menstrual pelvic pain were 47.3% and 30.9% (P = 0.007), respectively. The 75 mg linzagolix daily dose demonstrated a clinically meaningful and statistically significant reduction in dysmenorrhea versus placebo at 3 months. The proportion of responders for dysmenorrhea in the 75 mg linzagolix group was 44.0% compared with 23.5% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Although the 75 mg dose showed a trend toward reduction in non-menstrual pelvic pain at 3 months relative to the placebo, it was not statistically significant (P = 0.279). Significant improvements in dyschezia and overall pelvic pain were observed in both linzagolix groups when compared to placebo. Small improvements in dyspareunia scores were observed in both linzagolix groups but they were not significant. In both groups, hypoestrogenic effects were mild, with low rates of hot flushes and bone density loss of <1%. A daily dose of 200 mg linzagolix with ABT or 75 mg linzagolix alone was found to significantly reduce dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain also at 6 months of therapy.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Efficacy was compared between linzagolix groups and placebo; however, it would be useful to have results from comparative studies with estro-progestogens or progestogens. It will be important to ascertain whether gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists have significant benefits over traditional first-line medications.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Linzagolix administered orally once daily at a dose of 200 mg in combination with add-back therapy (ABT) demonstrated better efficacy and safety than placebo in the management of moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. The quality of life was improved and the risks of bone loss and vasomotor symptoms were minimized due to the ABT. The 75 mg dose alone could be suitable for chronic treatment of endometriosis-associated pain without the need for concomitant hormonal ABT, but further research is needed to confirm this. If confirmed, it would offer a viable option for women who do not want to wish to have ABT or for whom it is contraindicated.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): Funding for the EDELWEISS 3 study was provided by ObsEva (Geneva, Switzerland). Analysis of data and manuscript writing were partially supported by ObsEva (Geneva, Switzerland), Theramex (London, UK) and Kissei (Japan) and grant 5/4/150/5 was awarded to M.-M.D. by FNRS. J.D. was a member of the scientific advisory board of ObsEva until August 2022, a member of the scientific advisory board of PregLem, and received personal fees from Gedeon Richter, ObsEva and Theramex. J.D. received consulting fees, speakers' fees, and travel support from Gedeon Richter, Obseva and Theramex, which was paid to their institution. C.B. has received fees from Theramex, Gedeon Richter, and Myovant, and travel support from Gedeon Richter-all funds went to the University of Oxford. He was a member of the data monitoring board supervising the current study, and served at an advisory board for endometriosis studies of Myovant. H.T. has received grants from Abbvie and was past president of ASRM. F.C.H. has received fees from Gedeon Richter and Theramex. O.D. received fees for lectures from Gedeon Richter and ObsEva and research grants for clinical studies from Preglem and ObsEva independent from the current study. A.H. has received grants from NIHR, UKRI, CSO, Wellbeing of Women, and Roche Diagnostics; he has received fees from Theramex. A.H.'s institution has received honoraria for consultancy from Roche Diagnostics, Gesynta, and Joii. M.P. has nothing to declare. F.P. has received fees from Theramex. S.P.R. has been a member of the scientific advisory board of Gedeon Richter and received fees from Gedeon Richter. A.P. and M.B. are employees of Theramex. E.B. was an employee of ObsEva, sponsor chair of the data monitoring board supervising the current study, and has been working as a consultant for Theramex since December 2022; she owns stock options in ObsEva. M.-M.D. has received fees and travel support from Gedeon Richter and Theramex.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03992846.
TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE: 20 June 2019.
DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLLMENT: 13 June 2019.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (54)
- A model‐based analysis to guide gonadotropin‐releasing hormone receptor antagonist use for management of endometriosis via openalex
- A stepped-care approach to symptomatic endometriosis management: a participatory research initiative via openalex
- Can Endometriosis-Related Oxidative Stress Pave the Way for New Treatment Targets? via openalex
- Dosage aspects of danazol therapy in endometriosis: Short-term and long-term effectiveness via openalex
- Economic burden of endometriosis via openalex
- Effects of combined GnRH receptor antagonist linzagolix and hormonal add-back therapy on vaginal bleeding—delayed add-back onset does not improve bleeding pattern via openalex
- Elagolix for endometriosis: all that glitters is not gold via openalex
- Endometriosis via openalex
- Endometriosis and Medical Therapy: From Progestogens to Progesterone Resistance to GnRH Antagonists: A Review via openalex
- Endometriosis and nuclear receptors via openalex
- Endometriosis: An Inflammatory Disease That Requires New Therapeutic Options via openalex
- Endometriosis-associated infertility: From pathophysiology to tailored treatment via openalex
- Estrogen-progestins and progestins for the management of endometriosis via openalex
- Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists for Endometriosis via openalex
- Hormone treatment of endometriosis: The estrogenthreshold hypothesis via openalex
- Incremental direct and indirect cost burden attributed to endometriosis surgeries in the United States via openalex
- Long-term hormonal treatment reduces repetitive surgery for endometriosis recurrence via openalex
- Long-Term Outcomes of Elagolix in Women With Endometriosis via openalex
- Medical Treatment for Endometriosis: Tolerability, Quality of Life and Adherence via openalex
- Medical treatment of endometriosis-related pain via openalex
- Once daily oral relugolix combination therapy versus placebo in patients with endometriosis-associated pain: two replicate phase 3, randomised, double-blind, studies (SPIRIT 1 and 2) via openalex
- Partial suppression of estradiol: a new strategy in endometriosis management? via openalex
- Pathogenesis of endometriosis: Interaction between Endocrine and inflammatory pathways via openalex
- Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of endometriosis via openalex
- Peritoneal endometriosis is an inflammatory disease via openalex
- Peritoneal endometriosis is an inflammatory disease via openalex
- Peritoneal endometriosis, ovarian endometriosis, and adenomyotic nodules of the rectovaginal septum are three different entities via openalex
- Progesterone receptor ligands for the treatment of endometriosis: the mechanisms behind therapeutic success and failure via openalex
- Progestin-only pills may be a better first-line treatment for endometriosis than combined estrogen-progestin contraceptive pills via openalex
- Real-World Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Economic Burden Among Endometriosis Patients in the United States via openalex
- Relating Chronic Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis to Signs of Sensitization and Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction via openalex
- Sexual function in endometriosis patients and their partners: effect of the disease and consequences of treatment via openalex
- The burden of endometriosis: costs and quality of life of women with endometriosis and treated in referral centres via openalex
- The direct and indirect costs associated with endometriosis: a systematic literature review via openalex
- The efficacy of medical and surgical treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility: arguments in favour of a medico-surgical aproach via openalex
- The frequency of endometriosis in the general and selected populations: A systematic review via openalex
- Treatment of Endometriosis-Associated Pain with Elagolix, an Oral GnRH Antagonist via openalex
- Treatment of endometriosis-associated pain with linzagolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone–antagonist: a randomized clinical trial via openalex
- Treatment of pelvic pain associated with endometriosis: a committee opinion via openalex
- W4324370650 via openalex
- W2610244466 via openalex
- W3134885188 via openalex
- W3174379269 via openalex
- W3194419458 via openalex
- W3207063998 via openalex
- W2163315477 via openalex
- W2146933137 via openalex
- W4211081176 via openalex
- W4214754424 via openalex
- W4234160457 via openalex
- W4281977597 via openalex
- W4295895755 via openalex
- W4319789481 via openalex
- W2898392298 via openalex
Cited by (18)
- Changing the paradigm of endometriosis – from diagnosis to integrated long-term management: a joint society opinion paper 2026
- Aktuelle medikamentöse Ansätze bei Endometriose 2026
- Linzagolix – new perspectives in the pharmacotherapeutic management of uterine fibroids and endometriosis 2025
- Evaluation of rectal endometriosis treatment with high‐intensity focused ultrasound versus surgery: A clinical retrospective multicenter trial 2025
- What are the most significant challenges in understanding and managing endometriosis today? 2025
- Potency of oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist as endometriosis-associated pain novel treatments: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials 2025
- Prise en charge ostéopathique des douleurs pelviennes chroniques de la femme. Série de cas traités 2025
- Hormonal Treatment of Endometriosis: A Narrative Review 2025
- Efficacy and safety of drug combinations for chronic pelvic pain: a systematic review 2025
- Research Progress on the Treatment of Ovarian Endometrioma 2025
- Safety of current strategies to manage moderate to severe pain in patients with endometriosis 2025
- Recent Advances and Clinical Outcomes of Endometriosis 2025
- Pharmacokinetic considerations for gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists to treat endometriosis 2025
- Pharmacologic Interventions for Endometriosis-Related Pain 2025
- Risk of endometriosis progression in infertile women trying to conceive naturally or using IVF 2025
- The oral GnRH antagonists, a new class of drugs in gynecology: from pharmacokinetics to possible clinical applications 2024
- Elective uterine preservation: a novel concept to tackle reproductive ageing. Fertility preservation beyond ovaries 2024
- Managing the neuroinflammatory pain of endometriosis in light of chronic pelvic pain 2024
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-12T06:13:51.797165+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-06-12T06:11:59.804159+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK