Anatomic significance of a positive barium enema in deep infiltrating endometriosis of the large bowel

Vincent Anaf, Anaf V, El Nakadi I, Issam El Nakadi, V. De Moor, Veronique De Moor, De Moor V, Coppens E, Emmanuel Coppens, Zalcman M, Marc Zalcman, Noel JC, Jean‐Christophe Noël, Jean-Christophe Noel
World journal of surgery · 2009 · vol. 33(4) , pp. 822–7 · doi:10.1007/s00268-008-9903-3 · PMID:19190961 · W2061958315
Observational OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 36 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-06 ⓘ

A positive double-contrast barium enema for suspected bowel endometriosis accurately predicts deep infiltration of the large bowel wall, with perivisceral fat and muscularis involvement in all cases.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PURPOSE: The anatomopathological significance of a positive double-contrast barium enema (DCBE) for suspicion of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the large bowel was studied. This is a retrospective study of a prospective database. METHODS: A large-bowel resection was proposed for patients who were suspicious for large-bowel endometriosis and had a positive DCBE. In a series of 73 patients, 71 large-bowel resections were performed. Histology and immunohistochemistry with the monoclonal antibody CD-10 were performed on the resection specimen. Outcome measures were the length of the resected specimen, the largest diameter of the lesion, the positivity of the resection margins, and the degree of infiltration of the large bowel. We also compared the mean largest diameters of the lesions with the degree of infiltration of the large bowel. RESULTS: Between December 1997 and October 2005, 80 patients were suspicious for large-bowel endometriosis: 73 (91%) had positive DCBEs, and 7 (9%) had negative DCBEs. Of the 73 with positive DCBEs, 4 (5%) refused digestive resection and 1 (1.4%) was excluded. Three patients underwent two large-bowel resections because of the presence of bifocal lesions (left and right colon). A total of 71 resections were performed. In case of positive DCBE, the perivisceral fat and the whole muscularis were infiltrated in 100% of cases. The infiltration reached the submucosa and the mucosa respectively in 82% and 18% of cases. A total of 9.9% of resection margins were positive at histology but only focally. The mean largest diameter of the lesions infiltrating the whole thickness of the large bowel was not statistically different from the mean largest diameter of more superficial lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Findings of mass effect with indentations and ridging of the mucosa on DCBE in a setting suspicious for large-bowel endometriosis correspond well with pathologic findings of deep infiltration of the large-bowel wall. Clinicians dealing with deep infiltrating endometriosis should be aware of these findings, which could influence their choice of surgical treatment.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisdie_deep_infiltratingbowel_endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Barium Sulfate Barium Sulfate Endometriosis Intestinal Diseases Intestine, Large Intestine, Large Adult Adult Contrast Media Contrast Media Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Enema Enema Female Female Humans Humans Immunohistochemistry

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (33)

Cited by (33)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-15T06:08:49.021275+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:06:07.402396+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-15T06:24:24.424788+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK