The construction and validation of a health-related quality of life measure for women with endometriosis

dissertation OA: green CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View on OpenAlex
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This study developed and validated the Endometriosis Health Profile 30, a 64-item measure of health-related quality of life derived from qualitative interviews with endometriosis patients.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This study constructed and validated a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure specifically for women with endometriosis using an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design. In the qualitative phase, in-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 25 diagnosed women, and thematic analysis identified 11 HRQoL-related themes; in the quantitative phase, item reduction via psychometry expert review, relevance review by five endometriosis experts, and readability piloting led to a 64-item instrument, with item analysis removing 16 low-performing items and exploratory factor analysis yielding an eight-dimension structure. The resulting Stellenbosch Endometriosis Quality of Life (SEQOL) measure showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .92; subscales .72–.88) and “promising validity” based on correlations with other questionnaires. A limitation explicitly implied by the initial validation is that it is described as initial, with the main psychometric work relying on factor structure and internal consistency rather than broader external validation. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it develops and validates the SEQOL HRQoL measurement instrument for women with endometriosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to construct and validate a health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measure for patients with endometriosis.The study employed an exploratory, sequential mixed methods research design, consisting of a qualitative phase, followed by a quantitative phase.The study consisted of three aims.The first aim was to describe and understand the QOL-related experiences of women with endometriosis.This qualitative phase of the study involved in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 25 women diagnosed with endometriosis.I recorded and transcribed the interviews.I used thematic analysis to code the data and identify themes.Eleven themes emerged from the data, namely psychological functioning, sexual functioning, financial impact and considerations, healthcare and medical treatment, reproductive functioning, information and knowledge, interpersonal functioning, menstrual characteristics, occupational functioning, somatic features and physical functioning.The second aim of the study was to construct items for the instrument based on data collected during the first phase.The initial item pool consisted of 314 items.I then consulted with two experts in psychometry, who provided feedback relating to the clarity, conciseness, wording and ambiguity of items.This process resulted a reduced pool of 184 items.I asked five endometriosis experts to review the items in terms of relevance.Items that the experts regarded as highly relevant were retained in the measure and items that were not regarded as highly relevant were removed from the measure.The review resulted in the retention of 64 items.I piloted these items among seven women with endometriosis in order to assess the readability of the items.The final aim of the study was to determine the test reliability, validity and factor structure of the measure.This formed the quantitative component of the study.I administered the 64-item HRQOL measure, Endometriosis Health Profile 30, Short Form Health Survey,
Full text 11,219 characters · extracted from oa-html · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

ENGLISH SUMMARY: The purpose of this study was to construct and validate a health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measure for patients with endometriosis. The study employed an exploratory, sequential mixed methods research design, consisting of a qualitative phase, followed by a quantitative phase. The study consisted of three aims. The first aim was to describe and understand the QOL-related experiences of women with endometriosis. This qualitative phase of the study involved in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 25 women diagnosed with endometriosis. I recorded and transcribed the interviews. I used thematic analysis to code the data and identify themes. Eleven themes emerged from the data, namely psychological functioning, sexual functioning, financial impact and considerations, healthcare and medical treatment, reproductive functioning, information and knowledge, interpersonal functioning, menstrual characteristics, occupational functioning, somatic features and physical functioning. The second aim of the study was to construct items for the instrument based on data collected during the first phase. The initial item pool consisted of 314 items. I then consulted with two experts in psychometry, who provided feedback relating to the clarity, conciseness, wording and ambiguity of items. This process resulted a reduced pool of 184 items. I asked five endometriosis experts to review the items in terms of relevance. Items that the experts regarded as highly relevant were retained in the measure and items that were not regarded as highly relevant were removed from the measure. The review resulted in the retention of 64 items. I piloted these items among seven women with endometriosis in order to assess the readability of the items. The final aim of the study was to determine the test reliability, validity and factor structure of the measure. This formed the quantitative component of the study. I administered the 64-item HRQOL measure, Endometriosis Health Profile 30, Short Form Health Survey World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief scale and the Beck Depression Inventory to 203 patients with endometriosis. I conducted an item analysis and removed 16 items that displayed corrected item total correlations below .35. I then conducted an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) on the remaining 48 in order to establish the factor structure of the measure. The factor analysis identified thirteen items that either cross-loaded on more than one factor or that did not significantly load on any factor. These items were removed. The remaining 35 items produced an eight-dimension factor structure. A second EFA produced the same factor structure. I named the measure the Stellenbosch Endometriosis Quality of life (SEQOL) measure and the named the dimensions as follows: (1) Psychological well-being; (2) Income; (3) Sexual functioning and romantic relationships; (4) Reproductive functioning; (5) Vitality; (6) Occupational functioning; (7) Menstrual characteristics and (8) Support. The SEQOL and its subscales demonstrated excellent internal consistency reliability. The SEQOL produced a Cronbach’s α of .92 and the Cronbach’s α for the subscales ranged from .72 to .88. Correlations between scores on SEQOL, its subscales and other measures indicated promising validity. The initial validation indicates that the SEQOL may be a useful assessment of HRQOL in women with endometriosis, both in research and clinical practice. AFRIKAANS OPSOMMING: Die doel van hierdie studie was om ’n meetinstrument saam te stel om die gesondheidsverwante lewensgehalte (GVLG) van pasiënte met endometriose te meet. Die studie het gebruik gemaak van ’n ondersoekende, sekwensiële gemengde metode-ontwerp bestaande uit ’n kwalitatiewe fase, gevolg deur ’n kwantitatiewe fase. Die studie het drie doelstellings nagestreef. Die eerste doelstelling was om die KVL-verwante ervaringe van vroue met endometriose te beskryf en te verstaan. Hierdie kwalitatiewe fase van die studie het in-diepte, semigestruktureerde onderhoude met 25 vroue wat gediagnoseer is met endometriose behels. Ek het die onderhoude opgeneem en getranskribeer. Ek het tematiese analise gebruik om die data die te kodeer en temas te identifiseer. Ek het elf temas uit die data geïdentifiseer, naamlik sielkundige funksionering, seksuele funksionering, finansiële gevolge en oorwegings, gesondheidsorg en mediese behandeling, reproduktiewe funksionering, inligting en kennis, interpersoonlike funksionering, menstruele eienskappe, werksverwante funksionering, somatiese kenmerke en fisiese funksionering. Die tweede doelstelling van die studie was om items vir die meetinstrument te identifiseer op grond van die data wat gedurende die eerste fase ingesamel is. Ek het ’n aanvanklike kombinasie van items saamgestel bestaande uit 314 items. Ek het daarna twee kenners in psigometrie geraadpleeg en hulle het terugvoer verskaf rakende die duidelikheid, bondigheid, bewoording en dubbelsinnigheid van items. Die proses het uitgeloop op 184 items. Ek het vyf endometriose-kenners gevra om die items te hersien met betrekking tot relevansie. Die items wat die kenners beskou het as hoogs relevant is behou as deel van die meetinstrument en items wat nie beskou is as hoogs relevant nie, is verwyder. Dit het die behoud van 64 items tot gevolg gehad. Hierdie items is getoets tydens ’n toetsopname onder sewe vroue met endometriose om die leesbaarheid van die items te toets. Die finale doelstelling van die studie was om die toetsbetroubaarheid, geldigheid en faktorstruktuur van die meetinstrument te bepaal en te toets. Dit het die kwantitatiewe komponent van die studie uitgemaak. Ek het die 64-item GVLG meetinstrument, die EHP 30, die SF12v2, die WHOQOL Bref en die BDI by 203 pasiënte met endometriose afgeneem. Ek het ’n item-analise gedoen en 16 items wat gekorrigeerde itemtotaal-korrelasies onder .35 vertoon het uitgehaal. Daarna het ek ’n ondersoekende faktoranalise (OFA) gedoen van die oorblywende 48 om die faktorstruktuur van die meetinstrument vas te stel. Die faktoranalise het dertien items uitgewys wat hetsy met meer as een ander faktor oorkruis gelaai het, of wat nie beduidend gelaai het op enige faktor nie. Hierdie items is verwyder. Die oorblywende 35 items het ’n agt-dimensie faktorstruktuur gelewer. ’n Tweede OFA het dieselfde faktorstruktuur gelewer. Ek het die meetinstrument die Stellenbosch Endometriose Lewensgehalte (SELG) genoem en die dimensies soos volg benoem: Psigologiese welstand; (2) Inkomste; (3) Seksuele funksionering en romantiese verhoudings; (4) Reproduktiewe funksionering; (5) Vitaliteit; (6) Werksverwante funksionering; (7) Menstruele eienskappe; en (8) Ondersteuning. Die SELG en sy subskale het uitstekende interne internekonsekwentheid getoon. Die SELG het ’n Cronbach α van .92 gelewer en die Cronbach α vir die subskale het gewissel van .72 tot .88. Korrelasies tussen tellings op SELG, sy subskale en ander meetinstrumente het belowende geldigheid getoon. Die aanvanklike geldigheid het aangedui dat die SELG ’n bruikbare meting van GVLV in vroue met endometriose kan wees in beide navorsingkontekste en kliniese praktyk. AFRIKAANS OPSOMMING: Die doel van hierdie studie was om ’n meetinstrument saam te stel om die gesondheidsverwante lewensgehalte (GVLG) van pasiënte met endometriose te meet. Die studie het gebruik gemaak van ’n ondersoekende, sekwensiële gemengde metode-ontwerp bestaande uit ’n kwalitatiewe fase, gevolg deur ’n kwantitatiewe fase. Die studie het drie doelstellings nagestreef. Die eerste doelstelling was om die KVL-verwante ervaringe van vroue met endometriose te beskryf en te verstaan. Hierdie kwalitatiewe fase van die studie het in-diepte, semigestruktureerde onderhoude met 25 vroue wat gediagnoseer is met endometriose behels. Ek het die onderhoude opgeneem en getranskribeer. Ek het tematiese analise gebruik om die data die te kodeer en temas te identifiseer. Ek het elf temas uit die data geïdentifiseer, naamlik sielkundige funksionering, seksuele funksionering, finansiële gevolge en oorwegings, gesondheidsorg en mediese behandeling, reproduktiewe funksionering, inligting en kennis, interpersoonlike funksionering, menstruele eienskappe, werksverwante funksionering, somatiese kenmerke en fisiese funksionering. Die tweede doelstelling van die studie was om items vir die meetinstrument te identifiseer op grond van die data wat gedurende die eerste fase ingesamel is. Ek het ’n aanvanklike kombinasie van items saamgestel bestaande uit 314 items. Ek het daarna twee kenners in psigometrie geraadpleeg en hulle het terugvoer verskaf rakende die duidelikheid, bondigheid, bewoording en dubbelsinnigheid van items. Die proses het uitgeloop op 184 items. Ek het vyf endometriose-kenners gevra om die items te hersien met betrekking tot relevansie. Die items wat die kenners beskou het as hoogs relevant is behou as deel van die meetinstrument en items wat nie beskou is as hoogs relevant nie, is verwyder. Dit het die behoud van 64 items tot gevolg gehad. Hierdie items is getoets tydens ’n toetsopname onder sewe vroue met endometriose om die leesbaarheid van die items te toets. Die finale doelstelling van die studie was om die toetsbetroubaarheid, geldigheid en faktorstruktuur van die meetinstrument te bepaal en te toets. Dit het die kwantitatiewe komponent van die studie uitgemaak. Ek het die 64-item GVLG meetinstrument, die EHP 30, die SF12v2, die WHOQOL Bref en die BDI by 203 pasiënte met endometriose afgeneem. Ek het ’n item-analise gedoen en 16 items wat gekorrigeerde itemtotaal-korrelasies onder .35 vertoon het uitgehaal. Daarna het ek ’n ondersoekende faktoranalise (OFA) gedoen van die oorblywende 48 om die faktorstruktuur van die meetinstrument vas te stel. Die faktoranalise het dertien items uitgewys wat hetsy met meer as een ander faktor oorkruis gelaai het, of wat nie beduidend gelaai het op enige faktor nie. Hierdie items is verwyder. Die oorblywende 35 items het ’n agt-dimensie faktorstruktuur gelewer. ’n Tweede OFA het dieselfde faktorstruktuur gelewer. Ek het die meetinstrument die Stellenbosch Endometriose Lewensgehalte (SELG) genoem en die dimensies soos volg benoem: Psigologiese welstand; (2) Inkomste; (3) Seksuele funksionering en romantiese verhoudings; (4) Reproduktiewe funksionering; (5) Vitaliteit; (6) Werksverwante funksionering; (7) Menstruele eienskappe; en (8) Ondersteuning. Die SELG en sy subskale het uitstekende interne internekonsekwentheid getoon. Die SELG het ’n Cronbach α van .92 gelewer en die Cronbach α vir die subskale het gewissel van .72 tot .88. Korrelasies tussen tellings op SELG, sy subskale en ander meetinstrumente het belowende geldigheid getoon. Die aanvanklike geldigheid het aangedui dat die SELG ’n bruikbare meting van GVLV in vroue met endometriose kan wees in beide navorsingkontekste en kliniese praktyk. Description Thesis (PhD)--Stellenbosch University, 2017.

Keywords

Quality of life, Endometriosis -- Psychological aspects, UCTD

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Outcome instruments

EHP-30

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (100)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK