Development and psychometric evaluation of the Endometriosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire

Linda S Deal, Valerie S L Williams, Valerie Williams, Dana Britt DiBenedetti, Dana DiBenedetti, Sheri E Fehnel, Sheri Fehnel
Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2010 · vol. 19(6) , pp. 899–905 · doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9640-6 · PMID:20364332 · W2055749934
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 11 in-corpus citations
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

The Endometriosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire was developed and psychometrically evaluated to assess patient satisfaction with endometriosis treatment.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

The paper studied the development and psychometric evaluation of the Endometriosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ETSQ), a patient-reported instrument to assess satisfaction with endometriosis treatment. The ETSQ was built using results from five focus groups, three iterative rounds of cognitive interviews, expert input, and a literature review, and its psychometric properties were tested using data from a multicenter randomized proof-of-concept trial following FDA guidance for patient-reported outcome measures. The authors report that the ETSQ showed no evidence of distributional anomalies or response scale biases, was unidimensional with excellent internal consistency reliability, discriminated between known groups, and correlated well with other endometriosis patient-reported outcome measures without redundancy. The paper’s main limitation is that validation was based on a proof-of-concept trial dataset rather than broader, fully confirmatory validation across diverse settings. This paper is centrally about endometriosis—specifically the development and validation of a questionnaire to measure endometriosis treatment satisfaction.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

mesh:D004715endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Patient Satisfaction Psychometrics Surveys and Questionnaires Adult Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Focus Groups Humans Middle Aged Multicenter Studies as Topic Patient Satisfaction Psychometrics Psychometrics Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Reproducibility of Results Surveys and Questionnaires Treatment Outcome United States

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (19)

Cited by (11)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:17:12.951333+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK