Reliability of Visual Diagnosis of Endometriosis

Fernando S, Shavi Fernando, Pei Qian Soh, Soh PQ, Cooper M, Michael Cooper, Susan Evans, Reid G, Geoffrey Reid, Jim Tsaltas, Tsaltas J, Luk Rombauts
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · 2013 · vol. 20(6) , pp. 783–789 · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2013.04.017 · PMID:24183270 · W2149723640
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 39 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This paper assessed the reliability of visual diagnosis of endometriosis, evaluating how often the same diagnosis is made by different practitioners.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine whether accuracy of visual diagnosis of endometriosis at laparoscopy is determined by stage of disease.DesignProspective longitudinal cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).SettingTertiary referral centers in three Australian states.PatientsOf 1439 biopsy specimens, endometriosis was proved in at least one specimen in 431 patients.InterventionsLaparoscopy with visual diagnosis and staging of endometriosis followed by histopathologic analysis and confirmation. Operations were performed by five experienced laparoscopic gynecologists.Measurements and main resultsHistopathologic confirmation of visual diagnosis of endometriosis adjusted for significant covariates. Endometriosis was accurately diagnosed in 49.7% of American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) stage I, which was significantly less accurate than for other stages of endometriosis. Deep endometriosis was more likely to be diagnosed accurately than superficial endometriosis (adjusted odds ratio, 2.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-4.18; p < .01). Lesion volume was also predictive, with larger lesions diagnosed more accurately than smaller lesions. In general, lesion site did not greatly influence accuracy except for superficial ovarian lesions, which were more likely to be incorrectly diagnosed visually as endometriosis (adjusted odds ratio, 0.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.41; p < .01). There was no statistically significant difference in accuracy between the gynecologic surgeons.ConclusionThe accuracy of visual diagnosis of endometriosis was substantially influenced by American Society of Reproductive Medicine stage, the depth and volume of the lesion, and to a lesser extent the location of the lesion.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_pain

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Pelvic Pain Adult Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Laparoscopy Middle Aged Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain Prospective Studies Reproducibility of Results

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (27)

Cited by (41)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-19T06:08:28.815611+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:18:47.062786+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-19T06:23:00.919175+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK