New horizons in the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis.

review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-06

This systematic review analyzed diagnostic accuracy studies for non-invasive endometriosis biomarkers but found no clinically useful options, concluding more research is needed.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic disorder, clinically associated with chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, dysmenorrhea, and infertility. Its socio-economic impact is extensive, given the large number of affected women in reproductive age, its symptomatology (that interferes with normal social life and the patient's ability to work), and its frequent association with infertility. Nonetheless, the diagnosis of endometriosis is still difficult and late in the evolution of the disorder. The authors have used the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS) criteria to make a systematic review of the literature of the last 28 years, seeking to identify potential biomarkers useful for a non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. The authors have highlighted more than 50 biomarkers in the studies included in the present report, but they have not succeeded in identifying a clinically useful non-invasive diagnostic biomarker or panel of biomarkers. More studies are needed before biomarkers can be introduced in clinical practice.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

mesh:D004715endometriosischronic_pelvic_paindysmenorrheadyspareuniainfertility

MeSH descriptors

Biomarkers Endometriosis Antigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydrate Antigens, Tumor-Associated, Carbohydrate Ascitic Fluid Ascitic Fluid Autoantibodies Autoantibodies Biomarkers Biomarkers Biomarkers CA-125 Antigen Cytokines Cytokines Endometriosis Endometrium Endometrium Female Hormones Hormones

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (33)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:19:12.052662+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK