Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation
Diagnostic accuracy
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 281 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
Endovaginal ultrasound and MR imaging showed similar accuracy in diagnosing uterine adenomyosis, with sensitivities of 89% and specificities of 89% for both modalities.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of endovaginal ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the diagnosis of adenomyosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors prospectively studied 119 consecutive patients undergoing hysterectomy. The endovaginal US scans and MR images were interpreted independently in a double-blind fashion. Imaging findings were compared with those at histopathologic examination.
RESULTS: At histopathologic examination, adenomyosis was found in 28 of the 119 patients (24%). Sensitivity and specificity was 89% for endovaginal US and 89% for MR imaging. The positive predictive value was 71% for US and 65% for MR imaging. The negative predictive value was 96% for US and 95% for MR imaging. There was no statistically significant difference between the sensitivities (P = .65) and specificities (P = .75) of endovaginal US and MR imaging. The mean junctional zone (JZ) thickness on MR images in patients with and without proved adenomyosis was 15.0 mm +/- 4.9 and 7.7 mm +/- 3.3, respectively (P or = 12 mm.
CONCLUSION: Endovaginal US was as accurate as MR imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Use of a JZ thickness of > or= 12 mm should further optimize the diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (2-hop)
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]
Cited by (50)
- Adenomyosis and Uterine Fibroids: Two Distinct Yet Overlapping Clinical Entities 2026
- Clinical Outcomes of Uterine Artery Embolization in Adenomyosis With and Without Coexisting Uterine Fibroids or Ovarian Endometrioma: A Retrospective Clinical Analysis 2026
- Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for differentiating adenomyosis and uterine leiomyoma: A prospective histopathology-validated study 2026
- Plasma 5-Methoxytryptamine Depletion Links Tryptophan Metabolism to Menorrhagia in Adenomyosis: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Target 2025
- Three-dimensional modeling and intraoperative navigation in the diagnosis and treatment of various forms of adenomyosis 2025
- Mediocentral Compartment: Uterus: External Adenomyosis 2025
- Microabscess within adenomyosis combined with sepsis: a report of a rare clinical case 2025
- Gynecological Ultrasound 2025
- Correlation between transvaginal sonographic evaluation of adenomyosis and histopathological outcomes 2025
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse pregnancy outcomes with different types of adenomyosis 2025
- Adenomyosis: Unravelling the causes and exploring treatment strategies among patients seeking conception 2025
- Characteristics of adenomyosis in secondary infertility patients on MRI and factors associated with fertility recovery after HIFU 2025
- Perspectives in transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis 2025
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Classifications for Symptom of Adenomyosis 2024
- Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: A Pictorial Review on Differential Diagnosis and Not-So-Common Cases of Interventional Radiology Management 2024
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Classifications for Symptom of Adenomyosis 2024
- [Classification of Uterine Adenomyosis: A Pictorial Essay] 2024
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis 2024
- Large anechogenic “Holes” in the uterus: The utilityof contextual combination of ultrasound and hysteroscopy 2024
- Current Trends and Future Strategies on Diagnosis and Management of Adenomyosis: An Updated Review 2024
- Magnetic resonance imaging-based Classification criteria combined with Serum CA125 for dysmenorrhea before focused ultrasound ablation surgery in adenomyosis 2024
- Large Anechogenic “Holes” in the Uterus: The Utility of Contextual Combination of Ultrasound and Hysteroscopy 2023
- Adenomyosis: Current knowledge, Recent Advances and Future Perspective 2023
- The Present and the Future of Medical Therapies for Adenomyosis: A Narrative Review 2023
- Diagnóstico ecográfico de la endometriosis y los miomas 2023
- Differences in the incidence of obstetric complications depending on the extent and location of adenomyosis lesions 2023
- Inter-Rater Agreement for Diagnosing Adenomyosis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transvaginal Ultrasonography 2023
- Inter-rater Agreement for Diagnosing Adenomyosis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transvaginal Ultrasonography 2023
- Impact of adenomyosis and endometriosis on IVF/ICSI pregnancy outcome in patients undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment and frozen embryo transfer 2023
- Adenomyosis at a Glance: An Integrated Review of Transvaginal Ultrasound and MR Imaging Findings 2023
- Current Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques Used in the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis 2023
- The role of the junctional zone in the management of adenomyosis with infertility 2023
- What Is Adenomyosis? 2022
- Clinical Research Progress of Adenomyosis 2022
- Impact of adenomyosis and endometriosis on IVF/ICSI pregnancy outcome in patients undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment and frozen embryo transfer 2022
- Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Adenomyosis 2022
- Imaging of adenomyosis of uterus: What radiologist needs to know? 2022
- Noninvasive Diagnosis of Adenomyosis: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) 2022
- MRI of Adenomyosis: Where Are We Today? 2022
- Noninvasive Diagnosis of Adenomyosis: Ultrasonography 2022
- Noninvasive Diagnosis of Adenomyosis: Ultrasonography 2022
- Transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing adenomyosis: A systematic review and head-to-head meta-analysis 2022
- Preoperative CA125 as a risk factor for symptom recurrence of adenomyosis after ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation surgery 2022
- MRI of Adenomyosis: Where Are We Today? 2022
- Adenomyosis and infertility 2022
- Presence of adenomyosis at MRI reduces live birth rates in ART cycles for endometriosis 2022
- Uterine Artery Embolization for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: Proceedings from a Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation Research Consensus Panel 2022
- Adenomyosis in Pregnancy: Diagnostic Pearls and Pitfalls 2021
- Diffusion-weighted imaging of uterine adenomyosis: Correlation with clinical backgrounds and comparison with malignant uterine tumors 2021
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Adenomyosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis and Review of Sonographic Diagnostic Criteria 2021
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-15T06:08:49.021275+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:59:43.143194+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-10-15T06:24:24.424788+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK