Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation.
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 281 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
Endovaginal ultrasound and MR imaging showed similar accuracy in diagnosing uterine adenomyosis, with sensitivities of 89% and specificities of 89% for both modalities.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of endovaginal ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors prospectively studied 119 consecutive patients undergoing hysterectomy. The endovaginal US scans and MR images were interpreted independently in a double-blind fashion. Imaging findings were compared with those at histopathologic examination. RESULTS: At histopathologic examination, adenomyosis was found in 28 of the 119 patients (24%). Sensitivity and specificity was 89% for endovaginal US and 89% for MR imaging. The positive predictive value was 71% for US and 65% for MR imaging. The negative predictive value was 96% for US and 95% for MR imaging. There was no statistically significant difference between the sensitivities (P = .65) and specificities (P = .75) of endovaginal US and MR imaging. The mean junctional zone (JZ) thickness on MR images in patients with and without proved adenomyosis was 15.0 mm +/- 4.9 and 7.7 mm +/- 3.3, respectively (P or = 12 mm. CONCLUSION: Endovaginal US was as accurate as MR imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Use of a JZ thickness of > or= 12 mm should further optimize the diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
Cited by (50)
- Clinical Outcomes of Uterine Artery Embolization in Adenomyosis With and Without Coexisting Uterine Fibroids or Ovarian Endometrioma: A Retrospective Clinical Analysis 2026
- Acoustic radiation force impulse elastography for differentiating adenomyosis and uterine leiomyoma: A prospective histopathology-validated study 2026
- Mediocentral Compartment: Uterus: External Adenomyosis 2025
- Three-dimensional modeling and intraoperative navigation in the diagnosis and treatment of various forms of adenomyosis 2025
- Microabscess within adenomyosis combined with sepsis: a report of a rare clinical case 2025
- Adenomyosis: Unravelling the causes and exploring treatment strategies among patients seeking conception 2025
- Gynecological Ultrasound 2025
- Correlation between transvaginal sonographic evaluation of adenomyosis and histopathological outcomes 2025
- Perspectives in transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis 2025
- Plasma 5-Methoxytryptamine Depletion Links Tryptophan Metabolism to Menorrhagia in Adenomyosis: A Diagnostic and Therapeutic Target 2025
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of adverse pregnancy outcomes with different types of adenomyosis 2025
- Characteristics of adenomyosis in secondary infertility patients on MRI and factors associated with fertility recovery after HIFU 2025
- Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: A Pictorial Review on Differential Diagnosis and Not-So-Common Cases of Interventional Radiology Management 2024
- [Classification of Uterine Adenomyosis: A Pictorial Essay] 2024
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Classifications for Symptom of Adenomyosis 2024
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Classifications for Symptom of Adenomyosis 2024
- Magnetic resonance imaging-based Classification criteria combined with Serum CA125 for dysmenorrhea before focused ultrasound ablation surgery in adenomyosis 2024
- Current Trends and Future Strategies on Diagnosis and Management of Adenomyosis: An Updated Review 2024
- Large anechogenic “Holes” in the uterus: The utilityof contextual combination of ultrasound and hysteroscopy 2024
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis 2024
- Large Anechogenic “Holes” in the Uterus: The Utility of Contextual Combination of Ultrasound and Hysteroscopy 2023
- The Present and the Future of Medical Therapies for Adenomyosis: A Narrative Review 2023
- Adenomyosis: Current knowledge, Recent Advances and Future Perspective 2023
- Diagnóstico ecográfico de la endometriosis y los miomas 2023
- Inter-rater Agreement for Diagnosing Adenomyosis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transvaginal Ultrasonography 2023
- Differences in the incidence of obstetric complications depending on the extent and location of adenomyosis lesions 2023
- Inter-Rater Agreement for Diagnosing Adenomyosis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transvaginal Ultrasonography 2023
- The role of the junctional zone in the management of adenomyosis with infertility 2023
- Adenomyosis at a Glance: An Integrated Review of Transvaginal Ultrasound and MR Imaging Findings 2023
- Current Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques Used in the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis 2023
- Impact of adenomyosis and endometriosis on IVF/ICSI pregnancy outcome in patients undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment and frozen embryo transfer 2023
- Adenomyosis and infertility 2022
- Clinical Research Progress of Adenomyosis 2022
- Impact of adenomyosis and endometriosis on IVF/ICSI pregnancy outcome in patients undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist treatment and frozen embryo transfer 2022
- MRI of Adenomyosis: Where Are We Today? 2022
- Noninvasive Diagnosis of Adenomyosis: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) 2022
- Noninvasive Diagnosis of Adenomyosis: Ultrasonography 2022
- Noninvasive Diagnosis of Adenomyosis: Ultrasonography 2022
- Transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing adenomyosis: A systematic review and head-to-head meta-analysis 2022
- What Is Adenomyosis? 2022
- Preoperative CA125 as a risk factor for symptom recurrence of adenomyosis after ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation surgery 2022
- Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Adenomyosis 2022
- MRI of Adenomyosis: Where Are We Today? 2022
- Presence of adenomyosis at MRI reduces live birth rates in ART cycles for endometriosis 2022
- Imaging of adenomyosis of uterus: What radiologist needs to know? 2022
- Uterine Artery Embolization for Symptomatic Adenomyosis: Proceedings from a Society of Interventional Radiology Foundation Research Consensus Panel 2022
- Adenomyosis in Pregnancy: Diagnostic Pearls and Pitfalls 2021
- Estrogen 17β‑estradiol accelerates the proliferation of uterine junctional zone smooth muscle cells via the let‑7a/Lin28B axis in adenomyosis 2021
- Adenomyosis and Abnormal Uterine Bleeding 2021
- Prevalence of Female Pelvic Pathologies: Cross-sectional Study among Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Pelvic Assessment 2021
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-05T06:14:40.014199+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:02.671803+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-09-05T06:29:56.012541+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK