Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation.

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 281 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-11

Endovaginal ultrasound and MR imaging showed similar accuracy in diagnosing uterine adenomyosis, with sensitivities of 89% and specificities of 89% for both modalities.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of endovaginal ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors prospectively studied 119 consecutive patients undergoing hysterectomy. The endovaginal US scans and MR images were interpreted independently in a double-blind fashion. Imaging findings were compared with those at histopathologic examination. RESULTS: At histopathologic examination, adenomyosis was found in 28 of the 119 patients (24%). Sensitivity and specificity was 89% for endovaginal US and 89% for MR imaging. The positive predictive value was 71% for US and 65% for MR imaging. The negative predictive value was 96% for US and 95% for MR imaging. There was no statistically significant difference between the sensitivities (P = .65) and specificities (P = .75) of endovaginal US and MR imaging. The mean junctional zone (JZ) thickness on MR images in patients with and without proved adenomyosis was 15.0 mm +/- 4.9 and 7.7 mm +/- 3.3, respectively (P or = 12 mm. CONCLUSION: Endovaginal US was as accurate as MR imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Use of a JZ thickness of > or= 12 mm should further optimize the diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisadenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Uterine Diseases Double-Blind Method Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Hysterectomy Logistic Models Magnetic Resonance Imaging Magnetic Resonance Imaging Middle Aged Myometrium Myometrium Predictive Value of Tests Preoperative Care Prospective Studies ROC Curve Sensitivity and Specificity

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

Cited by (50)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-05T06:14:40.014199+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:11:02.671803+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-05T06:29:56.012541+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK