Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Pregnancies with Adenomyosis

article OA: closed CC0
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-06-07

This retrospective cohort study found adenomyosis in pregnancy is associated with increased risks of placenta abruptio, preterm delivery, hemorrhage, transfusion, DIC, sepsis, congenital anomalies, fetal demise, and cesarean delivery.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This retrospective cohort study used the US Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project–National Inpatient Sample to examine associations between adenomyosis and obstetrical and neonatal outcomes among all birth-related admissions from 2016 to 2019, identifying adenomyosis with ICD-10 code N80.03 and comparing outcomes to pregnancies without it. Using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for maternal demographics and including adjustment for mode of delivery to address cesarean-related detection bias, the study found adenomyosis was associated with higher risks of placenta abruptio, preterm delivery, preterm premature rupture of membranes, postpartum hemorrhage, postpartum transfusion, disseminated intravascular coagulation, sepsis, congenital anomalies, and intrauterine fetal demise, as well as an increased likelihood of cesarean delivery. A major limitation is that the analysis relies on administrative coding and cannot confirm clinical severity or diagnostic accuracy for adenomyosis. This paper is centrally about endometriosis and/or adenomyosis — it specifically evaluates pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in women with adenomyosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Adenomyosis is a common gynecologic disease involving the uterus, with its effect on pregnancy being poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the associations between adenomyosis and obstetrical and newborn outcomes. METHODS: Using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample from the United States, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of all birth-related admissions from 2016 to 2019. Pregnancies with adenomyosis were identified using the ICD-10 code N80.03, with the remaining pregnancies being the reference group. Then, ICD-10 codes were used to identify obstetrical and neonatal outcomes and multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for baseline maternal demographics, were used to determine the impact of adenomyosis on these outcomes. Also, in light of the potential detection bias inherent in births by cesarean delivery, adjustment for mode of delivery was included in all regression analyses. RESULTS: Among the 2,943,532 women who delivered between 2016 and 2019, 1,084 had adenomyosis, for an overall prevalence of 36 cases/100,000 births, which was stable throughout the study period. Adenomyosis in pregnancy was associated with increased frequency of placenta abruptio (adjusted OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.4), preterm delivery (1.4, 1.2-1.6), preterm premature rupture of membranes (1.3, 1.1-1.6), postpartum hemorrhage (2.7, 2.1-3.3), post-partum transfusion (2.2, 1.6-3.0), disseminated intravascular coagulation (9.3, 4.2-20.9), sepsis (2.7, 1.6-4.5), congenital anomalies (2.0, 1.3-2.8), and intrauterine fetal demise (2.0, 1.0-3.8). Also, these pregnancies had an elevated risk of delivering by cesarean (15.7, 12.7-19.3). CONCLUSION: Adenomyosis in pregnancy is associated with adverse obstetric and fetal outcomes. As such, pregnancies in patients with adenomyosis should be considered high-risk and should be delivered in centers capable of managing the potential poor events associated with these pregnancies.
Full text 19,583 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objectives Adenomyosis is a common gynecologic disease involving the uterus, with its effect on pregnancy being poorly understood. This study aimed to evaluate the associations between adenomyosis and obstetrical and newborn outcomes.

Methods

Using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample from the United States, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of all birth-related admissions from 2016 to 2019. Pregnancies with adenomyosis were identified using the ICD-10 code N80.03, with the remaining pregnancies being the reference group. Then, ICD-10 codes were used to identify obstetrical and neonatal outcomes and multivariable logistic regression models, adjusted for baseline maternal demographics, were used to determine the impact of adenomyosis on these outcomes. Also, in light of the potential detection bias inherent in births by cesarean delivery, adjustment for mode of delivery was included in all regression analyses.

Results

Among the 2,943,532 women who delivered between 2016 and 2019, 1,084 had adenomyosis, for an overall prevalence of 36 cases/100,000 births, which was stable throughout the study period. Adenomyosis in pregnancy was associated with increased frequency of placenta abruptio (adjusted OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.4), preterm delivery (1.4, 1.2-1.6), preterm premature rupture of membranes (1.3, 1.1-1.6), postpartum hemorrhage (2.7, 2.1-3.3), post-partum transfusion (2.2, 1.6-3.0), disseminated intravascular coagulation (9.3, 4.2-20.9), sepsis (2.7, 1.6-4.5), congenital anomalies (2.0, 1.3-2.8), and intrauterine fetal demise (2.0, 1.0-3.8). Also, these pregnancies had an elevated risk of delivering by cesarean (15.7, 12.7-19.3).

Conclusion

Adenomyosis in pregnancy is associated with adverse obstetric and fetal outcomes. As such, pregnancies in patients with adenomyosis should be considered high-risk and should be delivered in centers capable of managing the potential poor events associated with these pregnancies. Significance Pregnancies complicated by adenomyosis are associated with an increased risk of poor outcomes, including pre-eclampsia, preterm birth, postpartum hemorrhage, and cesarean section deliveries, although there are discordances in results between some studies. AbstractSection What this Study Adds?Adenomyosis in pregnancy is associated with a greater likelihood of individuals experiencing sepsis and disseminated intravascular coagulation. These adverse outcomes may be attributed to the chronic inflammatory state and the hypercoagulability characteristic of adenomyosis. Similar content being viewed by others Data Availability All data is freely available to the public from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project-National Inpatient Sample. Code Availability Not applicable.

References

Abbott, J. A. (2017). Adenomyosis and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB-A)-Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 40, 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.09.006 Ates, S., Aydın, S., & Ozcan, P. (2022). Cardiometabolic profiles in women with adenomyosis. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2022.2099256 Benagiano, G., Brosens, I., & Carrara, S. (2009). Adenomyosis: New knowledge is generating New treatment strategies. Womens Health (Lond), 5(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.2217/whe.09.7 Bertucci, E., Sileo, F. G., Diamanti, M., Alboni, C., Facchinetti, F., & La Marca, A. (2022). How adenomyosis changes throughout pregnancy: A retrospective cohort study. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14383 Bourdon, M., Santulli, P., Jeljeli, M., Vannuccini, S., Marcellin, L., Doridot, L., & Chapron, C. (2021). Immunological changes associated with adenomyosis: A systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, 27(1), 108–129. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmaa038 Brosens, J. J., Pijnenborg, R., & Brosens, I. A. (2002). The myometrial junctional zone spiral arteries in normal and abnormal pregnancies: A review of the literature. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 187(5), 1416–1423. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.127305 Brosens, I., Derwig, I., Brosens, J., Fusi, L., Benagiano, G., & Pijnenborg, R. (2010). The enigmatic uterine junctional zone: The missing link between reproductive disorders and major obstetrical disorders? Human Reproduction, 25(3), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dep474 Brosens, I., Pijnenborg, R., Vercruysse, L., & Romero, R. (2011). The great obstetrical syndromes are associated with disorders of deep placentation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 204(3), 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.009 Brosens, I., Pijnenborg, R., & Benagiano, G. (2013). Defective myometrial spiral artery remodelling as a cause of major obstetrical syndromes in endometriosis and adenomyosis. Placenta, 34(2), 100–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2012.11.017 Bruun, M. R., Arendt, L. H., Forman, A., & Ramlau-Hansen, C. H. (2018). Endometriosis and adenomyosis are associated with increased risk of preterm delivery and A small-for-gestational-age child: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 97(9), 1073–1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13364 Buggio, L., Monti, E., Gattei, U., Dridi, D., & Vercellini, P. (2018). Adenomyosis: Fertility and obstetric outcome. A comprehensive literature review. Minerva Ginecologica, 70(3), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.23736/s0026-4784.17.04163-6 Champaneria, R., Abedin, P., Daniels, J., Balogun, M., & Khan, K. S. (2010). Ultrasound scan and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: Systematic review comparing test accuracy. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 89(11), 1374–1384. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349.2010.512061 Curtis, K. M., Hillis, S. D., Marchbanks, P. A., & Peterson, H. B. (2002). Disruption of the endometrial-myometrial border during pregnancy as a risk factor for adenomyosis. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 187(3), 543–544. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2002.124285 Davies, M. J., Moore, V. M., Willson, K. J., Van Essen, P., Priest, K., Scott, H., & Chan, A. (2012). Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. New England Journal of Medicine, 366(19), 1803–1813. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1008095 Devlieger, R., D’Hooghe, T., & Timmerman, D. (2003). Uterine adenomyosis in the infertility clinic. Human Reproduction Update, 9(2), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmg010 Donnez, J., Carmona, F., Maitrot-Mantelet, L., Dolmans, M. M., & Chapron, C. (2022). Uterine disorders and iron deficiency anemia. Fertility and Sterility, 118(4), 615–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.011 Erguvan, R., Meydanli, M. M., Alkan, A., Edali, M. N., Gokce, H., & Kafkasli, A. (2003). Abscess in adenomyosis mimicking a malignancy in a 54-year-old woman. Infectious Diseases in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 11(1), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1155/s1064744903000085 Esmon, C. T. (2005). The interactions between inflammation and coagulation. British Journal of Haematology, 131(4), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05753.x Harada, T., Taniguchi, F., Amano, H., Kurozawa, Y., Ideno, Y., Hayashi, K., & Harada, T. (2019). Adverse obstetrical outcomes for women with endometriosis and adenomyosis: A large cohort of the Japan environment and children’s study. PLoS One, 14(8), e0220256. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220256 Harmsen, M. J., Wong, C. F. C., Mijatovic, V., Griffioen, A. W., Groenman, F., Hehenkamp, W. J. K., & Huirne, J. A. F (2019). Role of angiogenesis in adenomyosis-associated abnormal uterine bleeding and subfertility: A systematic review. Human Reproduction Update, 25(5), 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmz024 Hashimoto, A., Iriyama, T., Sayama, S., Nakayama, T., Komatsu, A., Miyauchi, A., & Fujii, T. (2018). Adenomyosis and adverse perinatal outcomes: Increased risk of second trimester miscarriage, preeclampsia, and placental malposition. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 31(3), 364–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1285895 HCUP NIS Database Documentation. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) February 2025. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/nation/nis/nisdbdocumentation.jsp Ibrahim, M. G., Chiantera, V., Frangini, S., Younes, S., Köhler, C., Taube, E. T., & Mechsner, S. (2015). Ultramicro-trauma in the endometrial-myometrial junctional zone and pale cell migration in adenomyosis. Fertility and Sterility, 104(6), 1475–1483e1471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.002 Jauniaux, E., Hempstock, J., Greenwold, N., & Burton, G. J. (2003). Trophoblastic oxidative stress in relation to Temporal and regional differences in maternal placental blood flow in normal and abnormal early pregnancies. American Journal of Pathology, 162(1), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9440(10)63803-5 Jean-Baptiste, H., Tetrokalashvili, M., Williams, T., Fogel, J., & Hsu, C. D. (2013). Characteristics associated with postoperative diagnosis of adenomyosis or combined adenomyosis with fibroids. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 122(2), 112–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.03.009 Jensen, K. K., Pyle, C., Foster, B. R., Sohaey, R., & Oh, K. Y. (2021). Adenomyosis in pregnancy: Diagnostic pearls and pitfalls. Radiographics: A Review Publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc, 41(3), 929–944. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2021200120 Juang, C. M., Chou, P., Yen, M. S., Twu, N. F., Horng, H. C., & Hsu, W. L. (2007). Adenomyosis and risk of preterm delivery. Bjog, 114(2), 165–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01186.x Kimura, F., Hanada, T., Nakamura, A., Amano, T., Tsuji, S., Kita, N., & Murakami, T. (2021). Case of adenomyosis causing the activation of the coagulation system after a complete loss of endometrium following microwave endometrial ablation. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 47(9), 3385–3391. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14898 Kobayashi, H. (2022). Possible association between adenomyosis and disseminated intravascular coagulation and thromboembolism: A systematic review. World Acad Sci J, 4(4), 27. Lin, Q., Li, T., Ding, S., Yu, Q., & Zhang, X. (2022). Anemia-Associated platelets and plasma prothrombin time increase in patients with adenomyosis. J Clin Med, 11(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154382 Maheshwari, A., Gurunath, S., Fatima, F., & Bhattacharya, S. (2012). Adenomyosis and subfertility: A systematic review of prevalence, diagnosis, treatment and fertility outcomes. Human Reproduction Update, 18(4), 374–392. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dms006 Mochimaru, A., Aoki, S., Oba, M. S., Kurasawa, K., Takahashi, T., & Hirahara, F. (2015). Adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with adenomyosis with uterine enlargement. The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 41(4), 529–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.12604 Nirgianakis, K., Kalaitzopoulos, D. R., Schwartz, A. S. K., Spaanderman, M., Kramer, B. W., Mueller, M. D., & Mueller, M. (2021). Fertility, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of patients with adenomyosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 42(1), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.09.023 Pierce, B. T., Pierce, L. M., Wagner, R. K., Apodaca, C. C., Hume, R. F. Jr., Nielsen, P. E., & Calhoun, B. C. (2000). Hypoperfusion causes increased production of Interleukin 6 and tumor necrosis factor alpha in the isolated, dually perfused placental cotyledon. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 183(4), 863–867. https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2000.108887 Pinborg, A., Wennerholm, U. B., Romundstad, L. B., Loft, A., Aittomaki, K., Söderström-Anttila, V., & Bergh, C. (2013). Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update, 19(2), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dms044 Rees, C. O., van Vliet, H., Siebers, A., Bulten, J., Huppelschoten, A., Westerhuis, M., & Schoot, B. (2023). The ADENO study: ADenomyosis and its effect on neonatal and obstetric outcomes: A retrospective population-based study. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 229(1), 49..e41-49.e12 Scala, C., Leone Roberti Maggiore, U., Racca, A., Barra, F., Vellone, V. G., Venturini, P. L., & Ferrero, S. (2018). Influence of adenomyosis on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes in women with endometriosis. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 52(5), 666–671. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.18989 Sharma, S., Bathwal, S., Agarwal, N., Chattopadhyay, R., Saha, I., & Chakravarty, B. (2019). Does presence of adenomyosis affect reproductive outcome in IVF cycles? A retrospective analysis of 973 patients. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 38(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.09.014 Shin, Y. J., Kwak, D. W., Chung, J. H., Kim, M. Y., Lee, S. W., & Han, Y. J. (2018). The risk of preterm births among pregnant women with adenomyosis. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 37(8), 1937–1943. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14540 Shinohara, S., Okuda, Y., Hirata, S., & Suzuki, K. (2020). Adenomyosis as a potential risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A multicenter Case-Control study. Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, 251(3), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.251.231 Skora, D., & Frankfurter, D. (2012). Adverse perinatal events associated with ART. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, 30(2), 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1307416 Stratopoulou, C. A., Camboni, A., Donnez, J., & Dolmans, M. M. (2021). Identifying common pathogenic features in deep endometriotic nodules and uterine adenomyosis. J Clin Med, 10(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194585 Tamura, H., Kishi, H., Kitade, M., Asai-Sato, M., Tanaka, A., Murakami, T., & Sugino, N. (2017). Complications and outcomes of pregnant women with adenomyosis in Japan. Reprod Med Biol, 16(4), 330–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12050 Templeman, C., Marshall, S. F., Ursin, G., Horn-Ross, P. L., Clarke, C. A., Allen, M., & Bernstein, L. (2008). Adenomyosis and endometriosis in the California teachers study. Fertility and Sterility, 90(2), 415–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.06.027 Upson, K., & Missmer, S. A. (2020). Epidemiology of adenomyosis. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine, 38(2–03), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1718920 Valentin, L. (2006). Imaging in gynecology. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 20(6), 881–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2006.06.001 Vannuccini, S., & Petraglia, F. (2019). Recent advances in understanding and managing adenomyosis. F1000Res, 8. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.17242.1 Vlahos, N. F., Theodoridis, T. D., & Partsinevelos, G. A. (2017). Myomas and adenomyosis: Impact on reproductive outcome. Biomed Research International, 2017, 5926470. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5926470 Wang, S., Duan, H., Zhang, Y., & Sun, F. Q. (2016). Abnormal activation of RhoA/ROCK-I signaling in junctional zone smooth muscle cells of patients with adenomyosis. Reprod Sci, 23(3), 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1177/1933719115602764 Wendel, M. P., & Magann, E. F. (2022). The impact of adenomyosis on pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes: A review. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey, 77(8), 495–500. https://doi.org/10.1097/ogx.0000000000001042 Weng, S. F., Yang, S. F., Wu, C. H., & Chan, T. F. (2013). Microabscess within adenomyosis combined with sepsis. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences, 29(7), 400–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2012.11.009 Yamanaka, A., Kimura, F., Yoshida, T., Kita, N., Takahashi, K., Kushima, R., & Murakmai, T. (2016). Dysfunctional coagulation and fibrinolysis systems due to adenomyosis is a possible cause of thrombosis and menorrhagia. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, 204, 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.499 Yamashiro, K., Tanaka, R., Nishioka, K., Ueno, Y., Shimura, H., Okuma, Y., & Urabe, T. (2012). Cerebral infarcts associated with adenomyosis among middle-aged women. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases: the official Journal of National Stroke Association, 21(8), 910e911–910e915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2011.10.017 Yasuda, M., Yamanaka, Y., Kano, H., Araki, N., Ishikawa, H., Ikeda, J. I., & Kuwabara, S. (2022). Recurrent cerebral infarcts associated with uterine adenomyosis: Successful prevention by surgical removal. Internal Medicine, 61(5), 735–738. https://doi.org/10.2169/internalmedicine.7320-21 Yeh, C. C., Su, F. H., Tzeng, C. R., Muo, C. H., & Wang, W. C. (2018). Women with adenomyosis are at higher risks of endometrial and thyroid cancers: A population-based historical cohort study. PLoS One, 13(3), e0194011. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194011 Younes, G., & Tulandi, T. (2017). Effects of adenomyosis on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes: A meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility, 108(3), 483–490e483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.025 Zhang, Y., Yu, P., Sun, F., Li, T. C., Cheng, J., & Duan, H. (2015). Expression of Oxytocin receptors in the uterine junctional zone in women with adenomyosis. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 94(4), 412–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.12595 Zhu, J. L., Basso, O., Obel, C., Bille, C., & Olsen, J. (2006). Infertility, infertility treatment, and congenital malformations: Danish National birth cohort. Bmj, 333(7570), 679. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38919.495718.AE Funding No funding was received for this study. Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions SH contributed to the design of the study; interpreted the data results; drafted the initial manuscript; and reviewed and revised the subsequent drafts of the manuscript. NCS carried out the data analyses and revised the manuscript. ARS contributed to the data analytic design; interpreted the data; and reviewed and revised the manuscript. HAA conceptualized the study; designed the study; supervised and designed the data analyses; and critically reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Ethical Approval According to the Tri-Council Policy of 2021, institutional ethics approval was not required for this study as it was solely based on data from a publicly available database. Consent to Participate Not applicable. Consent for Publications Not applicable. Competing Interests The authors report no competing interests. Additional information Publisher’s Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Hguig, S., Czuzoj-Shulman, N., Spence, A.R. et al. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Pregnancies with Adenomyosis. Matern Child Health J 29, 1284–1292 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04138-y Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-025-04138-y

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (59)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-15T06:16:59.523076+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-09-15T06:12:49.005315+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-15T06:33:26.365676+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK