Endometriosis, Animal model, Syngeneic, C57BL/6J, Fibrosis, EMT
Endometriosis (ENDO) is a prevalent, chronic, estrogen-dependent gynaecological disorder affecting
approximately 6–10% (~ 190 million) of reproductive-aged women globally 1. It is marked by the presence and
proliferation of viable ectopic endometrial-like tissue outside the uterus, commonly on the pelvic peritoneum or
ovaries2. Often simplified as solely dysmenorrhea3. ENDO is an etiologically complex, multifaceted inflammatory
condition. It is characterized by dysregulated cell proliferation, impaired hormonal signaling, chronic
inflammation, immunological dysregulation, angiogenesis, neurogenic inflammation, and notably, epithelial-
to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-induced tissue remodeling and fibrosis 4,5. ENDO is a major contributor
to debilitating chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and infertility. The often underestimated distress of ENDO extends
beyond pain, significantly impacting well-being and productivity 6. Laparoscopically, lesions are classified by
distribution, showing significant heterogeneity 7. Histological diagnosis requires at least two of: endometrial
epithelium, glands, stroma, nerve fibers/blood vessels, hemosiderin-laden macrophages, or fibrosis7. Despite its
1Division of Reproductive Biology, Department of Reproductive Science, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal
Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India. 2Manipal Centre for Biotherapeutics Research,
Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India. 3Nova IVF Fertility, Pantaloons Building,
Six Mile, Guwahati, Assam 781036, India. 4Krishna Nursing Home, 4-D, near Delux Bus Stand, Tashkand Society,
Nizampura, Vadodara, Gujarat 390002, India. 5Harsh Hospital & Maternity Home, Surat, Gujarat 395017, India.
6Sevashram Hospital, Bharuch, Gujarat 392001, India. 7Center for Animal Research, Ethics & Training, Manipal
Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India. 8Megha Anchan and Atharvaraj Hande contributed
equally to this work. email:
[email protected]
OPEN
Scientific Reports | (2025) 15:29024 1| https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13900-9
www.nature.com/scientificreports
commonality, ENDO’s pathogenesis remains unclear, and therapeutic options are limited, emphasizing the need
for research8.
John Sampson’s 1927 “retrograde menstruation” theory is the most cited explanation for ectopic tissue
implantation9,10. However, only a subset of women experiencing retrograde menstruation develop ENDO. This
suggests additional mechanisms, including immune evasion, implantation, proliferation, peritoneal invasion, and
neovascularization11,12. The inflammatory microenvironment, rich in alternatively activated macrophages and
neutrophils, cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors, is increasingly recognized as a key driver of ENDO 13.
Notably, fibrosis, once viewed as secondary, is now considered a defining characteristic of ENDO 14–17with
growing support for its inclusion in diagnostic criteria18,19. The inflammatory milieu in ENDO is closely linked
to fibrosis, as indicated by altered immune cell profiles and cytokine levels in peritoneal fluid20. Thus, ENDO can
be considered both an inflammatory and a fibrotic disease14. However, the interplay between inflammation and
the development of fibrotic endometriotic implants remains a critical research gap21.
Developing effective ENDO therapies necessitates evaluation in animal models that accurately mimic the
human disease. However, spontaneous ENDO is limited to menstruating species, with practical limitations 22.
Murine ENDO models are widely used due to their advantages 23 but rodents do not menstruate, making
retrograde menstruation an unlikely mechanism 24. Consequently, models involve surgical transplantation of
uterine tissue or human endometriotic tissue into mice 25–28 often with estrogen supplementation26,29. While
human tissue transplantation has benefits, it faces immune rejection issues 30. Surgical models create lesions
resembling clinical ENDO but can disrupt peritoneal immunity26. Intraperitoneal injection is also used but may
not fully replicate human lesions31,32.
Despite advancements in developing rodent models of ENDO, their ability to accurately replicate the
progressive fibrosis characteristic of chronic human ENDO remains a significant limitation. Existing models
often emphasize the initial formation of lesions and the accompanying immunological responses, largely
neglecting the gradual and ongoing progression of fibrosis. This lack of a reliable model that recapitulates the
fibrotic progression hinders the investigation of the underlying mechanisms of fibrogenesis and the preclinical
evaluation of potential anti-fibrotic therapies. A key challenge lies in the insufficient representation of the
progressive fibrotic process observed in human ENDO lesions. Furthermore, current models often provide an
inadequate evaluation of key myofibroblast markers such as α-SMA, Collagen I, and Nestin, which are crucial
for understanding fibrosis. Comprehensive data on ECM remodeling, with collagen deposition and tissue
stiffness in rodents mirroring human fibrotic alterations, are absent. Finally, an over-reliance on in vitro model
systems may not fully capture the complex cellular interactions and microenvironmental cues driving fibrosis
in vivo. These shortcomings underscore the pressing need for an optimized mouse model that comprehensively
replicates the progressive fibrotic aspects of human ENDO.
Therefore, our study aims to establish and validate an experimental fibrotic syngeneic mouse model of
ENDO by comparing C57BL/6J, BALB/c, and Swiss albino strains. We seek to identify the strain that most
accurately replicates the inflammatory and fibrotic pathophysiology of ENDO by thoroughly characterizing
the morphological, histological, and functional features of the generated model. This research provides a
comprehensive framework for assessing inflammation and fibrosis in ENDO. We aim to select the optimal
mouse strain for accurate disease modeling, addressing significant discrepancies between experimental models
and clinical pathology, particularly concerning fibrosis.
Methodology
All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. All procedures were
performed as described below.
Ethical approvals
Human sample experiments
This study involving human samples was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC1: 94/2022),
Kasturba Medical College and Kasturba Hospital, Manipal, adhering to the Helsinki Declaration of 1964 and
its later amendments. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Lesions were collected through
laparoscopic excision. While patient hormone status was not a primary focus of this study, standard clinical
protocols were followed for all sample collection.
Animal experiments
The Institutional Animal Ethics Committee at Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, approved the use of animals
(Approval Number: C57BL/6J- IAEC/KMC/88/2024, BALB/c- IAEC/KMC/45/2022, Swiss albino- IAEC/
KMC/56/2022). Institutional guidelines and the guidelines of the Committee for the Purpose of Control and
Supervision of Experiments on Animals (CPCSEA)were strictly followed for animal handling, and the reporting
of animal experiments follows ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In vivo Experiments) guidelines. The
study utilized adult inbred female mice (8–10 weeks, 23 ± 2 g) of three distinct strains: C57BL/6J, BALB/c,
and Swiss albino. All the animals were procured from the Central Animal Research Facility, Manipal Academy
of Higher Education. Mice were housed (6 per cage) in an environment-controlled setting (21 ± 2 °C, 50–
55% humidity, 12–12 h light-dark cycle) at the Central Animal Research Facility, Manipal Academy of Higher
Education, with ad libitum access to water and food.
Preparation of donor and recipient mice
A total of C57BL/6J (n = 27), BALB/c (n = 24), and Swiss albino (n = 27) mice were used for ENDO induction.
For each strain, recipient mice were assigned as follows: C57BL/6J (n = 14), BALB/c (n = 12), and Swiss albino (n
= 14). Six control mice were included for each strain. The experimental protocol was adapted from a previously
Scientific Reports | (2025) 15:29024 2| https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13900-9
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
published method33 with minor modifications. Syngeneic female donor and recipient mice of the three strains
were allowed to acclimate for 5 days before the experimental procedures. During this acclimation period, the
estrous cycle stages of each animal were monitored using the vaginal lavage method.
Development of a syngeneic mouse model of endometriosis
Following confirmation of consistent estrous cycling, donor mice were primed with subcutaneous injections of
estradiol benzoate (EB) (TCI chemicals, #E0329) (3 µg/mouse) for seven consecutive days to synchronize their
estrous cycles and promote endometrial development. After priming, donor mice were euthanized, and their
eutopic uterine horns were harvested. Excess fat and debris were carefully removed, and the uterine horns were
rinsed with cold, sterile 1x Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS) containing penicillin (100 U/mL) and streptomycin
(100 mg/mL) (Pen/strep) (ThermoFisher Scientific #15140122). The uterine tissue was then meticulously
minced into small cell aggregation suspensions of uterine fragments (UFs < 0.1 mm) containing both eutopic
endometrium and uterine muscle. These UF suspensions were divided into two equal portions, resuspended in
0.5 mL of PBS in a 1 mL syringe (Dispovan), and randomly injected I/P into recipient mice using an 18-gauge
needle (0.5 mL per recipient). Thus, each recipient mouse received endometrial tissue from half of a donor
uterus. Control mice received subcutaneous injections of estradiol benzoate and I/P injections of 0.5 mL of
sterile 1x PBS(without pen/strep). No signs of distress or unusual pain behaviors were observed post-injection.
Recipient animals received a single dose of EB before UF injection to synchronize their estrous cycles. Both the
recipients and control animals were subsequently administered EB every two days until sacrifice to maintain
uniform circulating estrogen levels (as depicted in Fig. 1).
Behavioral assessment of ENDO mice
Behavioral assays were conducted to assess pain-like behavior and anxiety levels in ENDO-induced mice.
All measurements were performed by the same investigator in a blinded manner to ensure consistency and
minimize bias. After each test, mice were returned to their home cages.
Burrowing assay (assessment of spontaneous behavior)
The burrowing assay, standardized by Deacon with minor modifications 34 was performed between 16:00 and
18:00 h (3 h before the dark cycle). Control and recipient mice were individually housed in cages equipped with
a burrow setup. Mice were initially acclimatized to the burrow tube (20 cm × 6 cm) filled with 200 g of chow
diet for 30 min without food in the cage hopper. Water was provided ad libitum. The test was initiated after
acclimatization to the laboratory setting with the burrow setup for at least one hour. Each mouse was placed in
its cage-burrow setup for two hours. Subsequently, the amount of feed burrowed was measured by weighing the
displaced amount in the morning.
Fig. 1. Experimental design and timeline of ENDO induction and behavioral assessments. UH from a single
donor mouse were processed into small fragments (~ 1 mm) and equally distributed via I/P injection into
two recipient mice to induce endometriosis. Behavioral assessments for pain (burrowing, von Frey) and
exploratory behavior (OFT) were conducted between days 16–18 post-induction. Subsequent tissue collection
for ELISA, flow cytometry (FC), histology (H&E), Masson’s trichrome staining (MTS), immunohistochemistry
(IHC), qRT-PCR, and Western blot (WB) was performed. (Created in part with BioRender.com).
Scientific Reports | (2025) 15:29024 3| https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13900-9
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Electronic von Frey reflex (EvF) (assessment of mechanical hyperalgesia)
Mechanical hyperalgesia was assessed using an electronic von Frey filament approach (Dynamic Plantar
Aesthesiometer, Ugo Basile) based on methodologies described by Barrot and Gregory 35,36. Mice were
individually placed in Plexiglas chambers on a wire mesh floor and allowed to acclimate for 1 h until exploratory
behavior ceased. A calibrated von Frey filament touch probe (Ugo Basile) applied a gradually increasing force (up
to 10 g) to the abdomen. A definite withdrawal response (abdominal retraction, licking, or flinching), along with
the corresponding filament force (grams) and duration (seconds), was recorded as the withdrawal threshold. An
interval of at least 30 min was maintained between applications.
Open field test (OFT) (assessment of exploratory behavior and anxiety)
Exploratory behavior and anxiety levels were assessed 9 days post-UF injection using the OFT 37. Control and
ENDO mice were individually placed in the center of a transparent Plexiglas box (50 cm × 50 cm × 40 cm)
with a clean floor. The box was virtually divided into central and peripheral zones. Each mouse was placed in a
corner and allowed to explore for 15 min. The number of entries into the central and peripheral zones, as well as
the time spent in them, were recorded using a video-tracking system (Logitech HD C930e webcam). Increased
anxiety is indicated by more time spent in the peripheral zones and fewer entries into the central zone. The data
were analyzed via ANY-maze 64-bit version 7.48 software.
Collection and processing of biological samples
On day 12 post-induction, all recipient mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation, and blood, peritoneal fluid
(PF), and suspected ENDO-like lesions were collected.
Blood and Serum: Blood was collected via cardiac puncture under Ketamine + Xylazine cocktail (0.1mL/20 g
mouse wt. IP) anesthesia. Serum was separated by centrifugation at 3000 × g for 10 min at 4 °C and stored at
−80 °C for ELISA-based cytokine analysis (IL-6, TNF-α, TGF-β, and Estrogen).
Peritoneal fluid (PF)
The PF was collected from the control and the recipient mice in individual tubes collected by peritoneal lavage
with 2 mL of sterile 1x PBS. The fluid was treated with RBC lysis buffer(eBioscience™ 1X RBC Lysis Buffer
Catalog number 00-4333-57) for 15 min and centrifuged to eliminate erythrocytes. The cells were subsequently
resuspended in sterile 1x PBS for flow cytometry analysis of M1 and M2 macrophage populations.
Ectopic lesions
Ectopic lesions were photographed for documentation using smart phone camera. Selected lesions were either
fixed in Bouin’s solution for 24 h, then transferred to 70% ethanol and embedded in paraffin for histological
and immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses, or flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for RNA
(E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and S100A4) and protein (Cytokeratin, Snail, and Vimentin) analyses. Recipient mice
without visible lesions were excluded from further investigation.
Validation of the syngeneic mouse model of ENDO
Model success rate
The overall success rate for each strain was calculated as the percentage of recipients with confirmed ectopic
lesions. This was done by evaluating recipient mice for ENDO-like lesions based on gross morphology,
histological analysis (H&E staining), and the presence of characteristic IHC markers such as Ki67 (proliferation),
CD31 (neovascularization), and F4/80 (macrophages).
Estrogen ELISA
Serum estradiol (E2) levels were quantified using a commercially available ELISA kit (ELK Biotechnology CO.,
LTD, #ELK8407) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Estradiol concentrations (pg/mL) were determined
by comparing sample absorbance (450 nm) to a standard curve generated with serially diluted estradiol standards,
analyzed in duplicate using a microplate reader (MultiSkan FC Microplate Photometer with SkanIt software).
Flow cytometry analysis of peritoneal fluid (PF)
PF cells were collected and treated with RBC lysis buffer as described earlier. After washing, 1 × 10 6 cells were
incubated with fluorophore-conjugated antibodies: anti-MO-CD11b-Alexa Fluor 488, anti-MO-CD86-APC,
and anti-MO-CD206-PE (all from eBioscience). After incubation, cells were washed and resuspended in PBS.
Flow cytometry analysis was performed using a BD Accuri™ C6 Plus flow cytometer, and data were analyzed
using FlowJo software to determine the percentage of positive cells for each marker.
Characterization of ectopic lesions
Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining
Ectopic ENDO lesions and control eutopic endometrium were fixed, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned
(4 μm). Sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, stained with hematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich, #HX03021349)
and eosin (Sigma-Aldrich, #1.15935), and mounted with DPX mountant (Sisco Research Laboratories Pvt Ltd,
# 88147). Slides were examined using a bright-field microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ei 4 W), and representative
images were captured. Histological assessment confirmed the presence of epithelial glands and stromal cells as
previously described38. Samples not exhibiting endometrial morphology were excluded.
Scientific Reports | (2025) 15:29024 4| https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13900-9
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Paraffin-embedded ectopic lesions from all three mouse strains were immunostained with primary antibodies
against Ki67 (proliferation), CD31 (blood vessels), and F4/80 (macrophages) (all from ThermoFisher Scientific).
Briefly, sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and antigens were retrieved using sodium citrate buffer
(Sigma-Aldrich, Missouri, USA #C7254). Sections were permeabilized with bovine serum albumin (BSA)
(HiMedia, India #MB083) in Triton X-100 (Sisco Research Laboratories Pvt Ltd #2024271), and blocked with
5% goat serum (Genei, #163018010A) before overnight incubation with primary antibodies at 4 °C, followed
by incubation with appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies Immunoreactive signals were visualized
using 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Sigmafast, Sigma-Aldrich, #D4293) (Sigma-Aldrich), and sections were
counterstained with hematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich, #HX03021349). Slides were mounted with DPX mountant,
and representative images were captured using a Nikon microscope (Nikon Eclipse Ei 4 W , Nikon, Tokyo, Japan)
and analyzed using ImageJ software. Antibody details are provided in Table 1.
Evaluation of fibrotic phenotype
Quantification of collagen deposition by Masson-Trichrome staining (MTS)
Collagen deposition in ectopic lesions was assessed using MTS39. Sections were fixed, embedded, deparaffinized,
and rehydrated. They were then sequentially stained with hematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich #HX03021349), Biebrich
scarlet-acid fuchsin solution(Loba chemie Pvt Ltd, #3855D), phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid(Loba
chemie Pvt Ltd, #05265)for 10–15 min, and, and aniline blue (Sisco Research Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.). After
dehydration and mounting, slides were examined under a light microscope. The area of collagen deposition
(blue staining) was quantified as a proportion of the total ectopic lesion area using ImageJ software.
Primary antibodies
Target Primary antibody Species raised in
Dilution used
(IHC/WB) Manufacturer & catalog number RRID
Proliferating cells (Ki67) Anti-Ki67 (Monoclonal) Rat 1:100
IHC ThermoFisher Scientific, #14-5698-82 AB_10854564
Blood vessels (CD31/PECAM) Anti-CD31 (Monoclonal) Rabbit 1:100
IHC ThermoFisher Scientific, #14-0311-81 AB_467201
Macrophages (F4/80) Anti-F4/80 (Monoclonal) Rat 1:50
IHC ThermoFisher Scientific, #14-4801-82 AB_467558
Pan-keratin (C11) mouse mAb Pan-keratin (Monoclonal) Mouse
1:500
IHC
1:1000
WB
Cell Signaling
TECHNOLOGIES #4545 -
αSMA Anti- αSMA (Monoclonal) Mouse 1:200
IHC ThermoFisher Scientific, #14-976080 AB_2572996
Nestin Anti- αSMA
(Monoclonal) Mouse 1:200
IHC ThermoFisher Scientific, #14-584380 AB_1907436
Vimentin rabbit pAb Vimentin (Polyclonal) Rabbit 1:1000
WB
ABclonal
#A11952 AB_2861643
Snail rabbit pAb Snail (Polyclonal) Rabbit 1:1000
WB
ABclonal
#A5243 AB_2766076
Secondary antibodies for DAB IHC
Target Secondary antibody Species raised in Dilution used Manufacturer & catalog number RRID
Rat IgG (H + L) Goat anti-rat IgG (H + L)
(HRP-conjugated) Goat 1:1000
IHC ThermoFisher Scientific, #A18865 AB_2535642
Mouse
IgG Fc
Goat anti-Mouse IgG Fc
Secondary Antibody, HRP Goat
1:1000
IHC
1:10000
WB
ThermoFisher Scientific, #A16084 AB_2534758
Rabbit IgG Fc Goat anti-Rabbit IgG Fc
Secondary Antibody, HRP Goat
1:1000
IHC
1:10000
WB
ThermoFisher Scientific, #A16116 AB_2534789
Antibodies used for flow cytometry
Target Primary antibody Species raised in Dilution used Manufacturer & catalog number RRID
CD 11b
Mouse
Anti-Mo-CD 11b-Alexa
flour 488
Monoclonal
Rat 0.5 µg/test eBioscience
# 53-0112-80 AB_469901
CD 86
Mouse
CD86 (B7-2) monoclonal
antibody (GL1), APC-
eFluor™ 780
Rat 0.06 µg/test eBioscience
# 17-0862-81 AB_469418
CD 206
Mouse
Anti-Mo-Cd206 (MMR)
Monoclonal Antibody
(MR6F3), PE
Rat 0.125 µg/test eBioscience
# 12-2061-80 AB_2637422
CD 68
Mouse
Anti-Mo-CD68 (FA-11),
PE Rat 0.25 μg/test eBioscience
#12-0681-80 AB_2572569
Table 1. Antibodies used in the study primary antibodies.
Scientific Reports | (2025) 15:29024 5| https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13900-9
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
COL1A1 ELISA
The levels of Collagen Type I (COL1A1) in ectopic tissue lysates were quantified using a commercially available
ELISA kit (Krishgen Biosystems, USA, #111111111). Lesions were homogenized in 1x PBS, centrifuged at 12,000
× g for 20 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was collected. ELISA was performed according to the manufacturer’s
instructions using 50 µL of lysate per sample, analyzed in duplicate. Optical density was measured at 450 nm,
and COL1A1 concentrations were calculated using a standard curve.
Quantification of iron deposition by prussian blue staining
Iron deposits in ectopic lesions were identified using Prussian blue staining based on Perls’ reaction40. Sections
were treated with a freshly prepared mixture of 5% potassium ferrocyanide (Sigma Aldrich #244023) and
hydrochloric acid (v/v), counterstained with nuclear fast red41 dehydrated, and mounted. Images were captured
using a Nikon microscope, and the area of iron deposition (blue staining) was measured using ImageJ software
(https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/download.html, RRID: SCR_003070).
Immunostaining for EMT markers
Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) status in ENDO lesions was assessed by immunostaining
for Cytokeratin (epithelial marker), α-Smooth Muscle Actin (α-SMA, mesenchymal/fibrotic marker), and
Nestin (marker of cellular plasticity/intermediate mesenchymal state) (all from Cell Signaling Technologies
or ThermoFisher Scientific; details in Table 1). The immunostaining procedure was performed as described
previously.
Measurement of pro-inflammatory cytokines
Snap-frozen serum samples were thawed, and cytokine concentrations (IL-6 (ABclonal, #RK00008), TNF-α
(ABclonal, #RK00027), and TGF-β (ABclonal, #RP01458), were measured using mouse-specific ELISA kits
according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Serum from control mice was used to establish baseline cytokine
levels. Standard curves were generated for each cytokine, and samples were analyzed ( n = 6 per group). The
detection limits for IL-6, TNF-α, and TGF-β were 7.2, 6.5, and 3.9 pg/mL, respectively.
RNA extraction and quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was extracted from frozen ENDO lesions ( n = 3 biological replicates) using a Qiagen RNeasy Mini
Kit (Qiagen, #74104). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using the PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit
(TaKaRa Bio Inc., #RR037A). qRT-PCR was performed using Sybr ® Premix Ex Taq™ II (Tli RNase H Plus,
TakaraBio, #RR820A) on a StepOne real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) to assess the gene expression of
fibrotic markers: E-cadherin, N-cadherin, and S100A4, with GAPDH as an internal control. Primer efficiencies
and specificities were confirmed to be between 90% and 110%. Reactions were performed in duplicate, and
amplification included initial denaturation (98 °C, 2 min) followed by 40 cycles of denaturation (98 °C, 30 s),
annealing (optimal temperature, 30 s), and extension (72 °C, 45 s). All samples were examined in triplicate.
Primer sequences were custom-synthesized by Bioserve Biotechnologies (India) Pvt Ltd and are provided in
Table 2.
Western blot analysis
Protein profiling for fibrosis-associated markers was performed on ectopic lesions by western blotting. Snap-
frozen ectopic lesions and corresponding eutopic endometrium were homogenized in RIPA lysis buffer with
protease inhibitor cocktail (TCI chemicals, #P2976). Equivalent amounts of protein (30 µg) were separated
by SDS-PAGE (10–12%) and blotted onto PVDF membranes. Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dry
milk and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies against Cytokeratin (ABclonal, #A5243), Snail
(ABclonal, #A5243), and Vimentin (ABclonal, #A11952). After washing with TBST, membranes were incubated
with appropriate secondary antibodies (1:10000) at RT for 1 h. Immunoreactive bands were visualized using
enhanced chemiluminescence and a gel documentation system (GE healthCare Systems, Amersham Imager
600).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (version 10.2). Data from two groups were analyzed
using Student’s t-test (unpaired, two-tailed, 95% CI, significance defined as p < 0.05). Ordinary one-way ANOV A
was used for comparisons of three or more groups. Data are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean
Gene Oligonucleotide sequence (5′ to 3′) Product size (bp)
GAPDH F- A T G G G A C G A T G C T G G T A C T G A
R- T G C T G A C A A C C T T G A G T G A A A T 117
E-cadherin F- A A C C C A A G C A C G T A T C A G G G
R- A C T G C T G G T C A G G A T C G T T G 142
N-cadherin F- C A C T G C C A T T G A T G C G G A T G
R- T G C C A C A G T G A T G A T G T C C C 136
S100A4 F- T T G T G G T T G A G C T G T G G G A G
R- G G T A A C C G T T G A G A C C C C T C 122
Table 2. Primer sequences used in the experiments.
Scientific Reports | (2025) 15:29024 6| https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-13900-9
www.nature.com/scientificreports/
(SEM) of triplicate measurements. Significant differences are indicated by asterisks in figures (* p < 0.05, ** p <
0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001).