Conventional IVF versus ICSI in sibling oocytes from couples with endometriosis and normozoospermic semen

article OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 16 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-06-06

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) resulted in higher fertilization rates, more day 2 embryos, and lower triploid fertilization compared to conventional IVF in oocytes from couples with endometriosis and normal sperm.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-06 · read from full text

This randomized study compared fertilization rate and subsequent embryonic development for sibling oocytes from couples in which the female had endometriosis and the male had normozoospermic semen, assigning each sibling oocyte to either conventional IVF or ICSI and then assessing fertilization, cleavage, blastulation, and embryonic morphology. ICSI produced a significantly higher fertilization rate (73.3±23% vs 54.7±31.9%) and more day 2 embryos (5.2±3.4 vs 3.6±2.9), while IVF showed a higher triploid fertilization rate (3.9±8.7% vs 0.9±3.1%); however, embryo morphology scores and day 2/3 development rates were not different between groups. When embryos were transferred from cycles using only one insemination method, pregnancy and implantation rates did not differ significantly. This paper is centrally about endometriosis-associated infertility — comparing conventional IVF versus ICSI outcomes in endometriosis patients with normozoospermic semen.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PurposeThis study compares the fertilization rate and embryonic development of oocytes randomly inseminated by conventional IVF or ICSI in patients with endometriosis and normozoospermic semen during IVF cycles.MethodsSibling oocytes were randomized to be inseminated either by ICSI or IVF. Rates of fertilization, cleavage, blastulation and embryonic morphology were assessed.ResultsA total of 786 sibling cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC) were randomized between insemination by conventional IVF (387 COC) or ICSI (399 COC). A significantly higher fertilization rate was found in the ICSI group (ICSI versus IVF, 73.3±23 % versus 54.7±31.9 % respectively; P=0.003), yielding a higher mean number of day 2 embryos (5.2±3.4 versus 3.6±2.9 respectively; P=0.002). Triploid fertilization rate (3PN/COC) was significantly higher in the IVF group compared to the ICSI group (3.9±8.7 % versus 0.9±3.1 % respectively; P=0.02). The morphology score and rate of development of day 2 and 3 embryos were not different between the two groups. Comparison of embryo transfer cycles in which either IVF or ICSI only embryos were transferred did not reveal any statistically significant differences in pregnancy or implantation rates.ConclusionICSI appears to be a better treatment option than conventional IVF in endometriosis-associated infertility, since it offers the advantages of higher fertilization rate and mean number of embryos and lower rate of total fertilization failure and triploid fertilization.
Full text 9,500 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose This study compares the fertilization rate and embryonic development of oocytes randomly inseminated by conventional IVF or ICSI in patients with endometriosis and normozoospermic semen during IVF cycles.

Methods

Sibling oocytes were randomized to be inseminated either by ICSI or IVF. Rates of fertilization, cleavage, blastulation and embryonic morphology were assessed.

Results

A total of 786 sibling cumulus-oocyte complexes (COC) were randomized between insemination by conventional IVF (387 COC) or ICSI (399 COC). A significantly higher fertilization rate was found in the ICSI group (ICSI versus IVF, 73.3±23 % versus 54.7±31.9 % respectively; P=0.003), yielding a higher mean number of day 2 embryos (5.2±3.4 versus 3.6±2.9 respectively; P=0.002). Triploid fertilization rate (3PN/COC) was significantly higher in the IVF group compared to the ICSI group (3.9±8.7 % versus 0.9±3.1 % respectively; P=0.02). The morphology score and rate of development of day 2 and 3 embryos were not different between the two groups. Comparison of embryo transfer cycles in which either IVF or ICSI only embryos were transferred did not reveal any statistically significant differences in pregnancy or implantation rates.

Conclusion

ICSI appears to be a better treatment option than conventional IVF in endometriosis-associated infertility, since it offers the advantages of higher fertilization rate and mean number of embryos and lower rate of total fertilization failure and triploid fertilization. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Missmer SA, Cramer DW. The epidemiology of endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2003;30:1–19. vii. Gupta S, Goldberg JM, Aziz N, Goldberg E, Krajcir N, Agarwal A. Pathogenic mechanisms in endometriosis-associated infertility. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:247–57. Mansour G, Sharma RK, Agarwal A, Falcone T. Endometriosis-induced alterations in mouse metaphase II oocyte microtubules and chromosomal alignment: a possible cause of infertility. Fertil Steril. 2010;94:1894–9. De Hondt A, Peeraer K, Meuleman C, Meeuwis L, De Loecker P, D'Hooghe TM. Endometriosis and subfertility treatment: a review. Minerva Ginecol. 2005;57:257–67. Norenstedt SN, Linderoth-Nagy C, Bergendal A, Sjoblom P, Bergqvist A. Reduced developmental potential in oocytes from women with endometriosis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001;18:644–9. Barnhart K, Dunsmoor-Su R, Coutifaris C. Effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:1148–55. Guzick DS, Silliman NP, Adamson GD, Buttram Jr VC, Canis M, Malinak LR, et al. Prediction of pregnancy in infertile women based on the American Society for Reproductive Medicine's revised classification of endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:822–9. Wardle PG, Mitchell JD, McLaughlin EA, Ray BD, McDermott A, Hull MG. Endometriosis and ovulatory disorder: reduced fertilisation in vitro compared with tubal and unexplained infertility. Lancet. 1985;2:236–9. Trinder J, Cahill DJ. Endometriosis and infertility: the debate continues. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2002;5:S21–7. Cahill DJ, Wardle PG, Maile LA, Harlow CR, Hull MG. Ovarian dysfunction in endometriosis-associated and unexplained infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14:554–7. Azem F, Lessing JB, Geva E, Shahar A, Lerner-Geva L, Yovel I, et al. Patients with stages III and IV endometriosis have a poorer outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer than patients with tubal infertility. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:1107–9. Hull MG, Williams JA, Ray B, McLaughlin EA, Akande VA, Ford WC. The contribution of subtle oocyte or sperm dysfunction affecting fertilization in endometriosis-associated or unexplained infertility: a controlled comparison with tubal infertility and use of donor spermatozoa. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1825–30. Pal L, Shifren JL, Isaacson KB, Chang Y, Leykin L, Toth TL. Impact of varying stages of endometriosis on the outcome of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15:27–31. Simon C, Gutierrez A, Vidal A, de los Santos MJ, Tarin JJ, Remohi J, et al. Outcome of patients with endometriosis in assisted reproduction: results from in-vitro fertilization and oocyte donation. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:725–9. Matson PL, Yovich JL. The treatment of infertility associated with endometriosis by in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1986;46:432–4. Mahmood TA, Messinis IE, Templeton A. Follicular development in spontaneous and stimulated cycles in women with minimal-mild endometriosis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;98:783–8. Coddington CC, Oehninger S, Cunningham DS, Hansen K, Sueldo CE, Hodgen GD. Peritoneal fluid from patients with endometriosis decreases sperm binding to the zona pellucida in the hemizona assay: a preliminary report. Fertil Steril. 1992;57:783–6. Faber BM, Chegini N, Mahony MC, Coddington 3rd CC. Macrophage secretory products and sperm zona pellucida binding. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98:668–73. Hershlag A, Paine T, Kvapil G, Feng H, Napolitano B. In vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection split: an insemination method to prevent fertilization failure. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:229–32. van Santbrink EJ, Hop WC, Fauser BC. Classification of normogonadotropic infertility: polycystic ovaries diagnosed by ultrasound versus endocrine characteristics of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:452–8. Van Steirteghem A, Liu J, Nagy Z, Joris H, Tournaye H, Liebaers I, et al. Use of assisted fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1784–5. Cummins JM, Breen TM, Harrison KL, Shaw JM, Wilson LM, Hennessey JF. A formula for scoring human embryo growth rates in in vitro fertilization: its value in predicting pregnancy and in comparison with visual estimates of embryo quality. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1986;3:284–95. Staessen C, Camus M, Clasen K, De Vos A, Van Steirteghem A. Conventional in-vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in sibling oocytes from couples with tubal infertility and normozoospermic semen. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2474–9. Aboulghar MA, Mansour RT, Serour GI, Amin YM, Kamal A. Prospective controlled randomized study of in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the treatment of tubal factor infertility with normal semen parameters. Fertil Steril. 1996;66:753–6. Bukulmez O, Yarali H, Yucel A, Sari T, Gurgan T. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus in vitro fertilization for patients with a tubal factor as their sole cause of infertility: a prospective, randomized trial. Fertil Steril. 2000;73:38–42. Garrido N, Navarro J, Remohi J, Simon C, Pellicer A. Follicular hormonal environment and embryo quality in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod Update. 2000;6:67–74. Garrido N, Pellicer A, Remohi J, Simon C. Uterine and ovarian function in endometriosis. Semin Reprod Med. 2003;21:183–92. Arici A, Oral E, Attar E, Tazuke SI, Olive DL. Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 concentration in peritoneal fluid of women with endometriosis and its modulation of expression in mesothelial cells. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:1065–72. Brizek CL, Schlaff S, Pellegrini VA, Frank JB, Worrilow KC. Increased incidence of aberrant morphological phenotypes in human embryogenesis–an association with endometriosis. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1995;12:106–12. Qiao J, Yeung WS, Yao YQ, Ho PC. The effects of follicular fluid from patients with different indications for IVF treatment on the binding of human spermatozoa to the zona pellucida. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:128–31. Ding GL, Chen XJ, Luo Q, Dong MY, Wang N, Huang HF. Attenuated oocyte fertilization and embryo development associated with altered growth factor/signal transduction induced by endometriotic peritoneal fluid. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:2538–44. Hwang JL, Seow KM, Lin YH, Hsieh BC, Huang LW, Chen HJ, et al. IVF versus ICSI in sibling oocytes from patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1261–5. Mahutte NG, Arici A. Failed fertilization: is it predictable? Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2003;15:211–8. Boyers SP, Diamond MP, Lavy G, Russell JB, DeCherney AH. The effect of polyploidy on embryo cleavage after in vitro fertilization in humans. Fertil Steril. 1987;48:624–7. Dandekar PV, Martin MC, Glass RH. Polypronuclear embryos after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1990;53:510–4. Jun SH, O'Leary T, Jackson KV, Racowsky C. Benefit of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in patients with a high incidence of triploidy in a prior in vitro fertilization cycle. Fertil Steril. 2006;86:825–9. Van Landuyt L, De Vos A, Joris H, Verheyen G, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Blastocyst formation in in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: influence of the fertilization procedure. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1397–403. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Additional information Capsule ICSI appears to be a better treatment option than conventional IVF in endometriosis-associated infertility, since it offers the advantages of higher fertilization rate and mean number of embryos and lower rates of total fertilization failure and triploid fertilization. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Komsky-Elbaz, A., Raziel, A., Friedler, S. et al. Conventional IVF versus ICSI in sibling oocytes from couples with endometriosis and normozoospermic semen. J Assist Reprod Genet 30, 251–257 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9922-8 Received: Accepted: Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9922-8

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Fertilization in Vitro Infertility, Female Infertility, Male Oocytes Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic Adult Cumulus Cells Cumulus Cells Embryo Transfer Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Family Characteristics Female Fertilization in Vitro Humans Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Infertility, Male Infertility, Male

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (39)

Cited by (16)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-16T06:11:32.772430+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T06:17:40.080092+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:15:58.344756+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK