Conventional IVF performs similarly in women with and without endometriosis

article OA: green CC0 ⤵ 7 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-06-08

This retrospective study found no significant differences in fertilization rates, embryo quality, or live birth rates between women with and without endometriosis undergoing conventional IVF with normozoospermic partners.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-11 · read from full text

This retrospective matched case–control study compared assisted reproduction outcomes after conventional IVF (c-IVF) in 314 women with endometriosis versus matched women undergoing ART for other indications, assuming normozoospermic partners and matching on age, number of oocytes retrieved, and study period. Across cycles from 2014–2020, the fertilization rate, total fertilization failure, embryo quality measures, and cumulative clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were similar between groups, with the only noted embryological difference being a higher number of top-quality cleavage-stage embryos in the endometriosis group. The authors conclude that endometriosis diagnosis did not negatively affect c-IVF performance in this setting, while acknowledging the retrospective design and the specific context of normozoospermic semen as key limitations. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it directly tests whether endometriosis affects conventional IVF outcomes compared with women without endometriosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PURPOSE: A reduced oocyte competence has been claimed as one of the factors underlying infertility in women with endometriosis. This idea has justified the hypothesis that intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), rather than conventional IVF (c-IVF), may overcome oocyte impairment and ensure better assisted reproduction technology (ART) outcomes; however, data from the literature are controversial. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare ART success rates following (c-IVF) between women with and without endometriosis in the presence of normozoospermic partners. METHODS: This is a retrospective, matched case-control study of 314 patients who underwent c-IVF cycles between January 2014 and December 2020. Women with endometriosis were matched in a 1:1 ratio with patients undergoing ART for other indications, considering age (± 6 months), number of oocytes retrieved (± 1), and study period. The main outcome measures included total fertilization failure, fertilization rate, embryo quality, cumulative clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates. RESULTS: The fertilization rate and the proportion of women with total fertilization failure did not differ between women with and without endometriosis. Similarly, all other embryological variables did not also differ, except for the number of top-quality cleavage stage embryos which was higher in the endometriosis group. Cumulative clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were similar between women with and without endometriosis. CONCLUSION: A diagnosis of endometriosis does not negatively affect the performance of c-IVF; thus, c-IVF can be efficiently used in women affected, unless a male factor is also involved. This issue holds clinical relevance to help operators on their insemination technique decision-making.
Full text 14,211 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose A reduced oocyte competence has been claimed as one of the factors underlying infertility in women with endometriosis. This idea has justified the hypothesis that intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), rather than conventional IVF (c-IVF), may overcome oocyte impairment and ensure better assisted reproduction technology (ART) outcomes; however, data from the literature are controversial. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare ART success rates following (c-IVF) between women with and without endometriosis in the presence of normozoospermic partners.

Methods

This is a retrospective, matched case–control study of 314 patients who underwent c-IVF cycles between January 2014 and December 2020. Women with endometriosis were matched in a 1:1 ratio with patients undergoing ART for other indications, considering age (± 6 months), number of oocytes retrieved (± 1), and study period. The main outcome measures included total fertilization failure, fertilization rate, embryo quality, cumulative clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates.

Results

The fertilization rate and the proportion of women with total fertilization failure did not differ between women with and without endometriosis. Similarly, all other embryological variables did not also differ, except for the number of top-quality cleavage stage embryos which was higher in the endometriosis group. Cumulative clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were similar between women with and without endometriosis.

Conclusion

A diagnosis of endometriosis does not negatively affect the performance of c-IVF; thus, c-IVF can be efficiently used in women affected, unless a male factor is also involved. This issue holds clinical relevance to help operators on their insemination technique decision-making. Similar content being viewed by others Data availability The database analysed during the current study is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Lee D, Kim SK, Lee JR, Jee BC. Management of endometriosis-related infertility: considerations and treatment options. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2020;47(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2019.02971. American Society of Reproductive Medicine. Endometriosis and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(3):591–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.031. Taylor HS, Kotlyar AM, Flores VA. Endometriosis is a chronic systemic disease: clinical challenges and novel innovations. The Lancet. 2021;397(10276):839–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00389-5. Coddington CC, Oehninger S, Cunningham DS, Hansen K, Sueldo CE, Hodgen GD. Peritoneal fluid from patients with endometriosis decreases sperm binding to the zona pellucida in the hemizona assay: a preliminary report. **Presented in part at the 46th Annual Meeting of the American Fertility Society, Washington, D.C., October 13 to 18, 1990. Fertil Steril. 1992;57(4):783–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54959-0. Pellicer A, Oliveira N, Ruiz A, Remohi J, Simon C. Exploring the mechanism(s) of endometriosis-related infertility: an analysis of embryo development and implantation in assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 1995;10(suppl 2):91–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/10.suppl_2.91. Palomino WA, Tayade C, Argandoña F, Devoto L, Young SL, Lessey BA. The endometria of women with endometriosis exhibit dysfunctional expression of complement regulatory proteins during the mid-secretory phase. J Reprod Immunol. 2018;125:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2017.10.046. Sanchez AM, Viganò P, Somigliana E, Panina-Bordignon P, Vercellini P, Candiani M. The distinguishing cellular and molecular features of the endometriotic ovarian cyst: from pathophysiology to the potential endometrioma-mediated damage to the ovary. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;20(2):217–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmt053. Zheng X, Yu X, Gil Y, Cai H, Han H, Guan J. Prevalence of subtle distal fallopian tube abnormalities and their association with endometriosis in infertility patients: a prospective cohort study. Hum Fertil. 2021;1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2021.1981551. Invernici D, Reschini M, Benaglia L, et al. The impact of endometriosis on IVF efficacy: qualitative and quantitative assessment of ovarian response and embryo development. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;45(2):275–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.04.010. Hamdan M, Dunselman G, Li TC, Cheong Y. The impact of endometrioma on IVF/ICSI outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(6):809–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv035. Muzii L, Di Tucci C, Di Feliciantonio M, et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone is reduced in the presence of ovarian endometriomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(5):932-940.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.025. Sanchez AM, Vanni VS, Bartiromo L, et al. Is the oocyte quality affected by endometriosis? A review of the literature. J Ovarian Res. 2017;10(1):43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-017-0341-4. Harb H, Gallos I, Chu J, Harb M, Coomarasamy A. The effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilisation outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG: An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;120(11):1308–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12366. Broi MGD, Ferriani RA, Navarro PA. Ethiopathogenic mechanisms of endometriosis-related infertility. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2019. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20190029. Komsky-Elbaz A, Raziel A, Friedler S, et al. Conventional IVF versus ICSI in sibling oocytes from couples with endometriosis and normozoospermic semen. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2012;30(2):251–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9922-8. Tan L, Brown KC, Dhanani H, Hughes L, Tekpetey F, Abu RB. IVF or ICSI: which is better in women with endometriosis associated infertility? Fertil Steril. 2018;110(4):e346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.07.965. Scarafia C, Masciovecchio M, Canosa S, et al. Does ovarian endometriosis increase oocyte sensitivity to ICSI-induced mechanical damage? J Clin Med. 2021;10(8):1757. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081757. World Health Organization. World Health Organization manual for the processing of human semen - 2010. Actas Urológicas Españolas (English Edition). 2010;34(7):577–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2173-5786(10)70143-8. Guerriero S, Condous G, van den Bosch T, et al. Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(3):318–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15955. Benaglia L, Candotti G, Papaleo E, et al. Pregnancy outcome in women with endometriosis achieving pregnancy with IVF. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(12):2730–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew210. Benaglia L, Cardellicchio L, Leonardi M, et al. Asymptomatic adenomyosis and embryo implantation in IVF cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;29(5):606–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.07.021. Cardellicchio L, Reschini M, Paffoni A, et al. Frozen–thawed blastocyst transfer in natural cycle: feasibility in everyday clinical practice. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017;295(6):1509–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4383-z. Somigliana E, Sarais V, Reschini M, et al. Single oral dose of vitamin D3 supplementation prior to in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in normal weight women: the SUNDRO randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;225(3):283.e1-283.e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.234. Balaban B, Brison D, Calderon G, et al. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(6):1270–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der037. Bartolacci A, Pagliardini L, Makieva S, Salonia A, Papaleo E, Viganò P. Abnormal sperm concentration and motility as well as advanced paternal age compromise early embryonic development but not pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective study of 1266 ICSI cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(10):1897–903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1256-8. Faber B. Macrophage secretory products and sperm zona pellucida binding. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;98(4):668–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01510-1. Toya M, Saito H, Ohta N, Saito T, Kaneko T, Hiroi M. Moderate and severe endometriosis is associated with alterations in the cell cycle of granulosa cells in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2000;73(2):344–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00507-5. Nakahara K, Saito H, Saito T, et al. Ovarian fecundity in patients with endometriosis can be estimated by the incidence of apoptotic bodies. Fertil Steril. 1998;69(5):931–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00038-7. Sanchez AM, Viganò P, Quattrone F, et al. The WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway and expression of survival promoting genes in luteinized granulosa cells: endometriosis as a paradigm for a dysregulated apoptosis pathway. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(6):1688–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.02.040. Dumesic DA, Meldrum DR, Katz-Jaffe MG, Krisher RL, Schoolcraft WB. Oocyte environment: follicular fluid and cumulus cells are critical for oocyte health. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(2):303–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.11.015. Yang X, Wu LL, Chura LR, et al. Exposure to lipid-rich follicular fluid is associated with endoplasmic reticulum stress and impaired oocyte maturation in cumulus-oocyte complexes. Fertil Steril. 2012;97(6):1438–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.034. Lin X, Dai Y, Tong X, et al. Excessive oxidative stress in cumulus granulosa cells induced cell senescence contributes to endometriosis-associated infertility. Redox Biol. 2020;30:101431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2020.101431. Goud PT, Goud AP, Joshi N, Puscheck E, Diamond MP, Abu-Soud HM. Dynamics of nitric oxide, altered follicular microenvironment, and oocyte quality in women with endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(1):151-159.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.053. Xu B, Guo N, Zhang X, Shi W, Tong X, Iqbal F, Liu, Y. Oocyte quality is decreased in women with minimal or mild endometriosis. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10779. ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology and Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine. The Vienna consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of ART laboratory performance indicators. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;35(5):494–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.06.015. Busnelli A, Reschini M, Cardellicchio L, Vegetti W, Somigliana E, Vercellini P. How common is real repeated implantation failure? An indirect estimate of the prevalence. Reprod Biomed Online. 2020;40(1):91–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.10.014. Vigano P, Benaglia L, Busnelli A, Berlanda N, Vercellini P, Somigliana E. Management of endometriosis in the infertile patient. Semin Reprod Med. 2016;35(01):031–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1597125. Shah DK, Correia KF, Vitonis AF, Missmer SA. Body size and endometriosis: results from 20 years of follow-up within the Nurses’ Health Study II prospective cohort. Hum Reprod. 2013;28(7):1783–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det120. Pabuccu R, Onalan G, Kaya C. GnRH agonist and antagonist protocols for stage I-II endometriosis and endometrioma in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Fertil Steril. 2007;88(4):832–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.12.046. Barnhart K. Effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(6):1148–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(02)03112-6. Da Broi MG, Giorgi VSI, Wang F, Keefe DL, Albertini D, Navarro PA. Influence of follicular fluid and cumulus cells on oocyte quality: clinical implications. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018;35(5):735–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1143-3. Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O, et al. ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. 2022;2022(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoac009. Endometriosis Treatment Italian Club. When more is not better: 10 “don’ts” in endometriosis management. An ETIC position statement. Hum Reprod Open. 2019;2019(3). https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoz009. Balli M, Cecchele A, Pisaturo V, et al. Opportunities and limits of conventional IVF versus ICSI: it is time to come off the fence. J Clin Med. 2022;11(19):5722. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195722. Dang VQ, Vuong LN, Luu TM, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional in-vitro fertilisation in couples with infertility in whom the male partner has normal total sperm count and motility: an open-label, randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2021;397(10284):1554–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00535-3. Funding This study was funded by the Italian Ministry of Health — Current research IRCCS. M.C. acknowledges the support of Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal do Nível Superior-Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of interest E.S. declares honoraria and grants from Theramex, Merck-Serono and Ferring. All the other authors have nothing to declare. Additional information Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Supplementary information Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Viganò, P., Reschini, M., Ciaffaglione, M. et al. Conventional IVF performs similarly in women with and without endometriosis. J Assist Reprod Genet 40, 599–607 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02700-z Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-022-02700-z

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (45)

Cited by (10)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-01T06:12:48.306406+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-09-01T06:12:17.223534+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK