Infertility surgery is dead: only the obituary remains?

article OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 21 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-12

This review discusses the historical evolution and current status of infertility surgery, questioning its continued relevance in modern reproductive medicine.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Despite the multiple advantages of assisted reproductive technology compared with surgery, there remain several diagnoses for which surgery is still widely performed: distal tubal occlusion, regret of permanent sterilization, and endometriosis. Assisted reproductive technology is superior to surgery and should be offered as first-line treatment.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Fallopian Tube Diseases Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Gynecologic Surgical Procedures Infertility, Female Reproductive Techniques, Assisted Reproductive Techniques, Assisted Sterilization, Reproductive Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Fallopian Tube Diseases Fallopian Tube Diseases Fallopian Tube Diseases Female Humans Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Patient Selection

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (31)

Cited by (22)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-25T06:15:30.875455+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:15:00.519696+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK