Tubal disease: towards a classification

Valentine Akande
In: Reproductive BioMedicine Online · 2007 · vol. 15(4) , pp. 369–375 · doi:10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60360-4 · PMID:17908396 · W1978545057
article OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This paper proposes a new classification system for tubal disease, aiming to improve diagnosis and management.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Tubal disease is a major cause of infertility. The amount of damage can vary greatly in extent, anatomical location and nature. For women with infertility due to tubal disease, prognostication for pregnancy often remains unclear and there is no universally accepted classification. A classification system that reliably distinguishes infertile patients with tubal disease into favourable and unfavourable groups would be useful if subsequent management could depend on this assessment, especially if the classification is able to define which group of patients would benefit most from interventions such as surgery. The progress of IVF questions the contribution of the Fallopian tube to the successful achievement of pregnancy in infertile women. Nonetheless, several studies reveal that severity is the key factor in the determining outcome, and the classifications reviewed in this paper imply that women with tubal disease could be categorized into prognostic groups using a simple classification system based on severity. However, prospective trials are needed to validate and assert the usefulness of any particular classification.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (72)

Cited by (3)

SciLite annotations

organisms 1
noordeloos 2009062

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-05-18T04:57:49.680383+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK