A pelvic scoring system for infertility surgery.

In: International journal of fertility · 1989 · vol. 33(5) , pp. 341–6 · PMID:2904422 · W2405855655
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 6 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This paper presents a pelvic scoring system (PLV#) to quantify infertility-related pelvic pathology (adhesions, salpingitis, tubal occlusion) for objective surgical comparison and prognosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

A pelvic scoring system for infertility surgery was devised in which pelvic pathology is assessed for comparative and prognostic purposes. Pelvic pathology was divided into three areas: adhesions (ADH), salpingitis (SPG), and tubal occlusion (TOC). The extent of pathology was scored as mild (1), moderate (2), severe (3), or extensive (4). The maximum scores for adhesions, salpingitis, and tubal occlusion were 48, 24, and 28, respectively--various weightings were applied and subareas accounted for. The pelvic score (PLV#) was simply the sum of the adhesions (ADH#), salpingitis (SPG#), and tubal occlusion (TOC#) scores. The stage of pelvic pathology was arbitrarily assigned as stage 0, I, II, III, and IV with PVL#'s of 0, 1-25, 26-50, 51-75, and 76-100, respectively. A close correlation (r = .960-.990) of PLV# was noted between different observers using this system. Poorer reproductive potential was observed in the patients with higher scores and stages. This scoring system properly reflects clinical experience and can be relied on for patient counseling via prediction of prognosis. This system can be utilized to compare objectively the results of infertility surgery between surgeons as well as among institutions.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

infertility

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

Cited by (6)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK