Introduction
of the experience robotic assisted laparoscopic
myomectomy in Michigan United States [7]. This minimally
invasive strategy is correlated with substantially diminished
hospitalization, lesser incidence of postoperative readmission,
lesser surgical morbidity in contrast to abdominal myomectomy
[8]. Although there are advantages still no clarification exists
over the impact of fibroids on the reproductive capacity as well
as if their removal does result in improvement of reproductive
results.
Generally it has been acknowledged that the fibroids which
are distorting cavity (FIGO 0,1,2 as well as 3) possess a negative
influence over the reproductive results (Figure 2) [9].
Following this invention Bonney performed greater than 700
myomectomies with remarkable reduction of mortality(7;1.1%)
[5]. Despite,the fame of Bonney was with regards to his
pioneering work of fertility sparing radical surgery in case of
cervical cancer he further gave recommendations apart from
early myomectomy but further for Ovarian cystectomy for
fertility preservation.. Bonney advocated utilization of this
Figure 1: Courtesy ref no. 2: Bonney clamp for uterine artery clamping.
Figure 2: Courtesy ref no-2: FIGO Fibroid Staging System (From Munro, et al. [96] IJGO 2018. (Used with permission of the author)
Volume 4 • Issue 2 • 37
Citation: Kaur KK, Allahbadia GN, Singh M. The Role of Reproductive Surgeons/Surgery has Got Rekindled with Plateauing of IVF Results and Advances in Technology:
A Comprehensive Narrative Review. J Obst Gynecol Surg. 2023;4(2):25-36. doi: 10.52916/jogs234037
J Obst Gynecol Surg,
ISSN: 2583-5912
Page 27 of 36
escalate uterine contractility as well as cause modification
of local hormonal along with paracrine environment of the
endometrium [16] (Figure 3).
Of the outcomes obtained whichcorroborate their resection is
the enhancement of quantities of Transforming Growth Factor-β
(TGF-β) liberated by large intramural fibroids which possesses
the capacity of changing bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-
2), along with HOXA 10 (member of the homeobox gene
family) expression [17]. HOXA 10 portrays a key messenger in
controlling endometrial receptivity continues to be persistently
lesser once there is existent a submucosal fibroid pointing
towards large intramural fibroids despite not distorting cavity,
might bepossessing inimical actions. Requirement of greater
studies is there for attaining insight over the advantages of
invasive myomectomy of non cavity distorting uterine fibroids.
In the latter part we describe the more innovative in the form of
non abating alternative to invasive myomectomy.
Surgery for Endometriosis Along With Adenomyosis
The isolation of endometrial glands with ectopic placement
got initially observed in 1860 as well as got revealed by the
pathologist Carl von Rokitansky in 1860 [18]. Subsequently in
1920 inimitable naming in addition to descriptions were made
by Sampson along with Frankl respectively. In the same time
period Cullen, et al. conducted surgeries for pain treatment for
situations believed to be endometriosis along with adenomyosis
currently; nevertheless, with considerable risks of mortality.
Despite, a diagnostic laparotomy comprised the single approach
to diagnose endometriosis in that era standardized therapy
constituted of Total Abdominal Hysterectomy (TAH) with bilateral
oophorectomy. Cullen failed to have realization dawned with
regards to restricted resection are efficacious in case of milder
disease. Furthermore, the 2 advances in these 100 years have
been the advent of Combined Oral Contraceptives (COC) pill in
On achieving pregnancy on the existence of fibroids which are
distorting cavity possess a correlation with escalation of aberrant
placement of placenta, Early Pregnancy Loss (EPL) abruptio
placentae, malpresentations or Intrauterine Growth Restriction
(IUGR) as well [10]. Retrospective studies pointed that removal
of the fibroids encroaching the cavity by hysteroscopic strategy
primarily might abrogate these risks [11].
The hysteroscopic myomectomy got generated subsequent
to adapting urological instruments meant for resection with
regards to treatment of prostate hyperplasia accessibility
has been there since 1980. Neuwirth RS, along with Amin HK
conducted first hysteroscopic myomectomy [12]. Subsequent
to tackling initial problems advancements with regards to
fluid management systems,shifting from monopolar to bipolar
electrosurgery in addition to utilization of media which is
isotonic possessing media meant for distension ensured events
that had safety along with were efficacious [8]. Greater advances
in instruments for instance hysteroscopic tissue morcellators,
have aided the surgeons in being comfortable regarding taking
place at the time of resection of large sized FIGO 0, as well
as 1 kind uterine fibroids. In contrast to instruments meant
for resection, morcellators aided in persistence of fragment
removal for maximization for observing without utilization of
electrosurgery that has the capacity of complications resulting
in hands having lesser experience.
With regards to FIGO 3 or greater, minimally invasive strategy
is usually believed to be the maximum accessible surgical
route. Despite introduction of laparoscopic strategy, by Kurt
Semm from Germany, Cameron Nezhat’sadding of video with
laparoscopy was the major reason of broad utilization of this
approach in view of the other observers in the room having
active part in the surgery. Additionally, utilization of diuted
vasopressin, barbed surgical sutures in addition to power
morcellation with regards to extracting tissues correlated with
considerable reduced Operation Room (OR) time along with
substantially diminished depletion of blood in contrast to earlier
reiteration of this method [13].
As per its part in conservation of fertility apart from fertility
escalating management, numerous uncontrolled studies have
indicated with regards to laparoscopic myomectomy for fibroids
which are distorting cavity has been correlated with lesser
pregnancy loss in contrast to no surgery . Moreover , different
large systematic reviews have revealed pooled pregnancy
rates of 49-57% subsequent to laparoscopic myomectomy
[14]. Nevertheless, no Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT), have
been conducted for assessment of part of minimally invasive
myomectomy regarding escalation of fertility. The heterogeneity
of the uterine fibroids in addition to patients features present
botheration for acquisition of the influence of fibroids on
fertility. As long as RCT are fashioned in addition to conducted
we can just presume with the causal interpretation regarding
the resection of fibroids which are distorting cavity is a probably
promising for women attempting to attain a pregnancy [15].
A matter which remains controversial is the partof myomectomy
in case of FIGO 3 to 4 fibroids determined to be over 3-4 cm
in size for escalating fertility. Despite, when fibroids are not
distorting cavity, intramural fibroids might result in dysfunctional
endometrial in addition to myometrial blood supply,
Figure 3: Courtesy ref no-2: Mechanisms that link uterine fibroids and
infertility. (From Dolmans, et al. [15]. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)
Volume 4 • Issue 2 • 37
Citation: Kaur KK, Allahbadia GN, Singh M. The Role of Reproductive Surgeons/Surgery has Got Rekindled with Plateauing of IVF Results and Advances in Technology:
A Comprehensive Narrative Review. J Obst Gynecol Surg. 2023;4(2):25-36. doi: 10.52916/jogs234037
J Obst Gynecol Surg,
ISSN: 2583-5912
hysterotomy scar [27].
Surgery for Adnexa
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS)-ovaries: Another fertility
sparing surgery not involving the uterus is conducted on the
ovaries. Of the maximum previous ovarian techniques were
inclusive of ovarian wedge resection in addition to drilling of
ovaries. The goal of both of these surgeries was disturbance of
the intraovarian androgen generation along with restoration
of folliculogenesis in a substantially lesser androgenic milieu
[29]. Stein as well as Leventhal originally detailed Ovarian
wedge resection in their pioneering work over 7 patients whose
presentation was having amenorrhoea as well as Polycystic
ovaries [30]. On realization with regards to this strategy leading
to remarkably escalated incidence of post surgical adhesion
generation (in greater than 90% of patients) that could not be
accepted, thereby ovarian drilling replaced it. The initial ovarian
drilling got conducted in 1984 [31].
Ovarian drilling comprises of creation of numerous holes
over the ovarian cortex with the utilization of electrosurgical
instruments has been acknowledged tobe the second line
strategyfor patients with resistance to agents meant for induction
of ovulation [32]. To start with it was advocated to make 10-20
holes/ovary, in view of the illustration of the following ovarian
failure, their was modification to creation of holes not more
than 4/ovary with the utilization of particular electrosurgical
fashion of energy delivered [33]. Patients having earlier failure
of induction of ovulation, ovarian drilling portrays an efficacious
manner with regards to restoration of ovulation function in
addition to normalization of androgen quantities along with
correlated symptoms with PCOS. Furthermore, pregnancy
rates were apparently akin to those observed subsequent to
gonadotropins treatment; however with considerably lesser
risk of multiple pregnancy as well as Ovarian Hyperstimulation
Syndrome (OHSS) [34].
Endometriomas-ovaries: William Wood Russell was the person
who firstly detailed the existence of endometrial tissue amongst
ovaries-alias ovarian endometriomas [35]. Subsequently
considerable knowledge has been attained in the context of the
manner by which endometriomas influence ovarian reserve.
The chronic inflammatory injury which results secondary to
endometriomas leads to propagation of tissue fibrosis that might
addition to laparoscopic surgery [19]. Now surgeons possess
the capacityof treating pelvic pain or in case of tubal factor
infertility with utilization of a minimally invasive strategy.
With regards to pelvic pain in view of endometriosis, despite the
strategy in addition to techniques conducted have undergone
advancements, surgery persists to be a significant part in
the treatment of endometriosis. Regarding superficial areas
destroying these damaged areas involved ablating such lesions
in contrast to excisingwas illustrated to possess akin efficacy
for treating pelvic pain in a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT),
nevertheless, in case of deep infiltrating endometriosis full
excision is needed with it getting acknowledged with regards to
depth of the lesions in addition to their usual intricate association
with adjacent organs [20,21]. In the context of infertility fraction
in view of endometriosis, the advantages of surgical diagnosis
as well as destroying the disease is not clear. Marcoux, et al.
[22], randomly enrolled patients with mild endometriosis into 2
groups 1 group for diagnostic laparoscopy/surgical ablation along
with observations were that removal of disease by any means
escalated pregnancy rates with regards to pregnancy which was
unassisted. Nevertheless, on combination of outcomes obtained
in an akin fashioned randomized study that was revealed 2 years
later the patients number in an acknowledged endometriosis
pointed that requirementfor surgical ablation for achieving Live
Birth Rates (LBR) unassisted was 12. Nevertheless, for patients
who were having asymptomptomatic unexplained infertility
with the presumption of 30% incidence of endometriosis
observed at diagnostic laparoscopy were required to have
laparoscopy for a single extra unassisted LBR, a quantity that
has led to advocate no laparoscopy in such patients with In
Vitro Fertilization (IVF) being given preference in the form of
alternative for maximization of fertility [23-25].
Surgery which is fertility sparing with regards to dysmenorrhoea
in addition tomenorrhagoea in view of adenomyosis started
getting escalatingly used subsequent to displaying successful
wedge resections got revealedin 50’s to 1960’s [26]. Surgery
which is fertility sparing gets lesser used in contrast to in other
pathologies, partially in view of the restrictions imposed for
precise diagnostic methodologies despite recent advancements
in imaging modalities might aid in greater isolation of correct
surgical subjects. Additionally, the absence of precise planes
correlated with focal as well as diffuse kinds of this problem
causes a greater complex resection in contrast to that with
myomectomy. Although, there are such hurdles surgical
innovations by Japanese surgeons generated numerous
innovative strategies over last certain decades for maximization
of the quantities of adenomyosis resected with concurrent
fertility conservation. 2 noticeable approaches which have been
posited having the aim of total adenomyosis getting excised are
inclusive of asymmetrical dissection methodology in addition to
triple flap one (Figure 4) [27].
Long term following of 2123 uterine adenomyomectomies which
got reported from 13 Japanese centres was 449 pregnancies
leading to361 live birth delivery rates [30]. Nevertheless, the
larger incision essential with thesesurgical strategies escalates
the risks of uterine rupture in a subsequent pregnancy to
3-6% in contrast to baseline of 0.005% in case of a nonscarred
uterus along with <1% of subsequent to a prior myomectomy/
Page 28 of 36
Figure 4: Courtesy ref no-2: Representation of the steps of the Osada
procedure for resection of diffuse adenomysosis. (From Osada uterine
adenomyosis and adenomyoma: the surgical approach) (Reprinted by
permission of the publisher.)
Volume 4 • Issue 2 • 37
Citation: Kaur KK, Allahbadia GN, Singh M. The Role of Reproductive Surgeons/Surgery has Got Rekindled with Plateauing of IVF Results and Advances in Technology:
A Comprehensive Narrative Review. J Obst Gynecol Surg. 2023;4(2):25-36. doi: 10.52916/jogs234037
J Obst Gynecol Surg,
ISSN: 2583-5912
misfortune no success was attained however 8 years later
it turned out to be the fortune of numerous infertile women
(Figure 5) [48].
Additionally combination with surgical strategies for reduction
of acute inflammatory response along with avoidance of
postoperative adhesions adhesions initiated by Gomel V as
well as Garcia C, there was drastic escalation of successful
anastomosis. In case of modern date minimally invasive
strategies in women amongst 18-30 years, 30-33 years in
addition to 34-49 years might anticipate pregnancy rates of
73%, 64% as well as 46% respectively [49]. Besides, the kind
of the sterilization done (84% with utilization of clips vis a vis
with 41% using bipolar electrosurgery) in addition to the extent
of the residual tube (≥ 4 cm vs ≤ 4 cm) portion both factors of
significance with regards to prognosis of reproductive success
[50].
Just till 1990’s tubal operations were believed tobe treatment
strategies for getting over tubal disease at the timewhen
escalation of IVF success rates with regards to LBR moved
from 14% to 31.6% [51]. In case of this time period of Assisted
Reproductive Technology (ART), it is significant to take into
account various factors for instance ovarian reserve,coexistent
diagnosis for infertility, number of children wanted, apart from
patients preference, religious thought processes along with
accessibility of ART.
In contrast to IVF cumulative Live Birth Rates (LBR) over time
period of 5 years were commensurate to ones having undergone
tubal reanastamosis (52% vis a vis 60%) other than women
cumulative LBR with tubal reanastamosis
(72.2% vis a vis 52.4%) [50]. The ART results in 2001 given by
American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) in 2001
registry [51].
Mullerian Abnormalities
Other than the tackling of the uterine leiomyomas,
endometriosis, as well as adnexal disorders reproductive
surgeons have to tackle complicated mullerian abnormalities. An
cause displacement in addition to reduction of ovarian follicles
followed by reduction in oocyte quality in addition to ovarian
reserve [36]. Moreover, endometriomas might further result
in diminished ovarian reserve by evoking premature follicular
generation along with atrophy, thus causing augmentation of
ovarian insufficiency. Kitajima, et al. [37], recently illustrated
that endometriomas might result in premature activation of
Granulosa Cells (GCs) resulting in escalated follicular atresia
with resultant diminished qualityof remnant Primordial Follicles
(PF).
Numerous methodologies have been detailed with regards
to annhilation of ovarian endometriomas. Differentially from
other cysts endometriomas being invasive possess a significant
correlation with tissue fibrosis beneath its presence. Thereby
laparoscopic drainage along with ablation portray early surgical
strategy however were correlated with substantially greater
rate of recurrence. Cystectomy, which implicates stripping of the
cyst wall,partially or in its entirety portrayed a natural evolution;
however in which significant expertise was the need of the hour.
On contrasting with ablation, cystectomy was correlated with
significant inimical influence over antral follicles count as well as
Antimullerian Hormone (AMH) quantities [38]. What comprises
of remarkable significance is the decision making with regards
to initial surgical attempt is total excision of the ovarian
endometrioma in view of repeated surgeries for recurrent cyst
gets correlated with significant depletion of ovarian reserve
in contrast to a single lone surgery [39]. Innovations by the
laparoscopic surgeon with the utilization of hydrodissection
in addition to laser vaporization have been illustrated tobe
safe with ovarian conservation strategies [40,41]. Earlier
sclerotherapy utilizing ethanol or lidocainehas been considered
an option in infertile cases who present with pain as an option
[9] portrays another minimally invasive surgical attempt
which might be attempted transvaginally by a Reproductive
Endocrinology and Infertility specialist (REI) represents who
are already accustomed to performing transvaginal needle
procedures. Nevertheless, its part is restricted apparently to
patients that represent poor surgical candidates whose cysts
prevent safe oocyte recovery [42,43].
Tubal operations: In 1896 the first fallopian tubes reconstruction
got attempted [44]. Nevertheless, not till introduction of
microsurgical strategies in 60’s and 1970’s this procedure came in
modern use. Previous attempts for salpingostomy used Mulligan
hood-a silastic device which was sutured to the opening of
tubes for sustenance of patency, however the requirement was
a second look laparotomy 3 months subsequently to its removal
[45]. In view of the production of considerable adhesions
from the originating laparotomy as well as need for invasive
methodologies, temporary tubal patency methodologies
were not accepted. In 1967 Sweden’s Swolin K subsequent
tohis observations of intraperitoneal delivered hydrocortisone
diminished postoperative adhesions, with him conducting 33
salpingostomies through laparotomy for restoration of fertility
[46]. 10 intrauterine pregnancies (30.3%) were revealed
by him in addition to12.1% rate of ectopic pregnancies. 3
years subsequently Leslie Brown who bore the First IVF child
Louis Brown further underwent bilateral salpingostomies for
attenuatation of tubal blockade [47]. Nevertheless, to her
Page 29 of 36
Figure5: Courtesy ref no-2: Tubal reanastomosis demonstrating the use of
stay sutures forreapproximation (blue arrow) followed by serial interrupted
10-0 sutures to complete anastomosis. (From Gomel, et al. [48].Reprinted
by permission of the publisher.)
Volume 4 • Issue 2 • 37
Citation: Kaur KK, Allahbadia GN, Singh M. The Role of Reproductive Surgeons/Surgery has Got Rekindled with Plateauing of IVF Results and Advances in Technology:
A Comprehensive Narrative Review. J Obst Gynecol Surg. 2023;4(2):25-36. doi: 10.52916/jogs234037
J Obst Gynecol Surg,
ISSN: 2583-5912
olive with its placement in the perineum using an abdominally
tensioning gadget with application of cranioventral tension
at the time period of 4-7 days. Besides stretching techniques
neovagina generation is feasible by utilization of replacement
tissues [64]. The McIndoe in addition to Davydov techniques
are dependent on either a split thickness skin graft or use
of peritoneum respectively. Innovative strategies implicate
use of novel tissues like buccal mucosa, tilapia skin fish or
use of placental membranes that aid in augmentation of the
tissues present in the manner which further escalates tissue
characteristics as well as their functional working.
Ectopic Pregnancies
Apart from escalating surgeries reproductive surgeons possess
the part in surgical treatment of ectopic pregnancies, particularly
cervical in addition to caesarean scar implantation pregnancies.
updated classification of mullerian abnormalities was given by
the American Society of Reproductive Medicine in 2021 (ASRM)
[52]. This newer gadget with correlated interactive website
gives a useful clinical gadget in aiding in differential diagnosis
with regards to these abnormalities. In future this gadget would
be aiding in surgical videos for aiding in better detailing of the
surgical of these complicated mullerian abnormalities.
Presumably one of the most common abnormalities which we
in the form of the REI specialist have to tackle is the uterine
septum. Presentation of women having uterine septum is an
escalation of risk of infertility, recurrent miscarriage as well
as preterm birth [52]. Retrospective outcomes obtained have
pointed that an incision might escalate pregnancy rates [53].
A recent multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT), The
Randomized Uterine Septum Transaction Trial (TRUST) was
not able to illustrate any escalation of successful reproductive
outcomes in case of women who underwent septum excision
[54]. Substantial restricting factors of their study was wide
inclusion criteria , definition of uterine septum was considerably
liberal, with significant time consumption in enrolment for
instance 8 years for 80 patients getting enrolled were believed to
be the significant restricting factors in view of generalization of
their outcomes. Till trials that have been fashioned vigorously we
have persistence of uncertainty with regards to the advantages
in our thought perception of septum incision. Managing greater
complicated abnormalities by surgical means are canonically
conducted for abrogation of pain in addition to conservation
along with restoration of fertility in case of obstructive
abnormalities. Having the acknowledgement regarding broad
kinds of pathologies are present with mullerian abnormalities,
this newer classification would aid in diagnostic assessment
along with surgical management of these complicated mullerian
abnormalities (Figure 6) [55].
Furthermore vaginal abnormalities might be present alone
or correlated with uterine aberrations for instance Mayer
Rokitansky–Kuster–Hauser Syndrome is the diagnosis for an
individual presentingwith lack of mullerian development in a
patient presenting with primary amenorrhea and no apparent
vagina [56].
Regarding the patients with vaginal agenesis,neo vaginal
generation by stretching thevagina, its replacement or
approaches regarding its augmentation. Generation of a
neovagina through its stretching with the utilization of
dilators was first detailed by Frank Rin (1938) a reproductive
endocrinologist in NewYork [57]. To start with one begins inthe
posterior direction and then after 2 weeks changingdirection
upwards towards the usual line of vaginal axis, pressure is
applied with dilators available commercially for 20’/day to the
point of modest discomfort. Gradually utilizing larger dilator
a functional vagina can be createdin several months [58-62].
Plastic syringe covers can beused instead of the expensive
commercial glass dilators. A very easier and effective technique
is to hold the dilatorin place with a tight garment, maintaining
pressure by sittingon a running bicycle seat (mounted on a
special stoolor even a bicycle) [63]. In case of women having
unsuccessful dilation surgical vaginal stretching by utilization
of Vecchietti technique is remarkably successful obtaining a
vaginal length of 8-9 cm in routine. Its basis is utilization of an
Page 30 of 36
Figure 6: Courtesy ref no-2: Wide range of surgical findings at the time
of laparoscopic management of noncommunicating rudimentary horns.
(From Fedele, et al. [55]. Reprinted by permission of the publisher.) UU ¼
Unicornuate uterus; RH ¼ rudimentary horn.
Volume 4 • Issue 2 • 37
Citation: Kaur KK, Allahbadia GN, Singh M. The Role of Reproductive Surgeons/Surgery has Got Rekindled with Plateauing of IVF Results and Advances in Technology:
A Comprehensive Narrative Review. J Obst Gynecol Surg. 2023;4(2):25-36. doi: 10.52916/jogs234037
J Obst Gynecol Surg,
ISSN: 2583-5912
Despite, the first uterine transplantation was conducted in
SaudiArabia in the year 2000 (a patient who had a hysterectomy
in view of Post Partum Haemorrhage (PPH), practically 14 years
subsequently the first live birth was obtained in Sweden by
Branstrom M, et al. [72]. Subsequently it has been attempted
to decline surgical morbidity to living donors by obtaining
organs from either demised or brain dead both of which have
yielded live births [73]. It has been determined that greater
than 60 uterine transplantations have been conducted leading
to greater than 20 live births as detected by May 2020 [74].
Uterine transplantations in US (n=33) one year survival of the
graft had been 74% (23/31 recipient) of which 58% (19/33
recipient) had borne 21 live births [75]. The average GA at birth
of neonates was 36 weeks 6 days (30 ± 1-38 weaks) as well as
average birth weights 2860 (1310-3940), median (range) (58th-
6th-98th) percentile. Once the morbidity the recipient as well
as obstetrical/neonatal results escalate it has been pointed that
enhanced interest would be evoked in utilization of uterine
transplantations in aiding in chance for pregnancy in case of
AUFI as well as those who had a hysterectomy, patients having
presentation in the form of androgen insensitivity syndrome,
robust Ashermanns Syndrome in addition to transgender
female patients.
Oncofertility: For the female cancer patients having requirement
for gonadotoxic chemotherapy or pelvic radiotherapy, various
surgical strategies are present for conservation of future fertility
further than oocyte along with embryo cryopreservation.
Despite, certain are beyond the REI’s, usual practice, procedures
like radical trachelectomy however others for instance
cryopreservation of ovarian tissue, ovarian transpositions
in addition to uterine fixations,can be well tackled by the
reproductive surgeons.
McCall from the Louisiana States University documented the
first patient ovarian transpositions for a patients with Cervical
Cancer in 1958 [76]. It has been well acknowledged that the
oocyte possesses substantial sensitivity to ionizing radiation
with just 4-6 Gy sufficient for the depletion of a minimum of
50% of all ovarian follicles [77]. The degree of injury to ovarian
reserve is basically based upon the full radiation dosage
delivered to the ovary, baseline ovarian reserve as well as age of
the patient. in case of ovarian transpositions movement of 1 or
both ovaries out of the pelvis has been implicated canonically as
lateral along with as cephalic the extent the full anatomy aids in
a void of total bulk of the anticipated radiation field of the pelvic
radiotherapy (Figure 7) [78].
Subsequent to 1958 patients with colorectal cancer as well as
pelvic lymphomas who are posted for pelvic radiotherapy. In a
recent meta-analysis where 892 patients underwent ovarian
transpositions with subsequent brachytherapy, 94% illustrated
conservation of ovarian function following radiotherapy, how
diminished to 65% in the ones who had external beam radiation
therapy, with/without brachy therapy [79]. Subsequent to
gonadotoxic therapy ovaries are canonically left back in the
transposed localization with regards to ovarian stimulation in
view of migration back towards the radiated region is correlated
with escalated rates of ovarian insufficiency [80]. Although,
it yields substantial success in conservation gone through of
future fertility less than 10% of women below the age of 35
About 2% of the total pregnancies in the United States are
ectopic,out of which 10% have implantation in non tubal areas
[65]. Advancements in Imaging technologies REI’s have produced
innovative minimally invasive methodologies for tackling the
patients who are stable basically by Ultra sonography-driven
local injection. REI’s have sufficient expertisefor performing
these techniques in view of routine utilization of Trans Vaginal
Ultra Sonography (TVS) for oocyte retrieval. Injection of
methotrexate or potassium chloride have been substantially
detailed earlier [66]. Incidence of caesarean scar pregnancy
apparently has been escalating in view of escalation of number
of caesarean deliveries throughout the world with a study
quoting an incidence as high as 1 in 531 women possessing
a caesarean scar would generate a caesarean scar pregnancy
[67]. First line treatment usuallycomprises of direct injection
of methotrexate or potassium chloride as well as aspirating
with a needle with/ without systemic methotrexate delivery.
Operative removal by a laparoscopic strategy or USG driven
or vacuum aspiration are believed to be the first line surgical
strategies where a gestation sac is present in which case either
methotrexate or potassium chloride availability is not there or
are contraindicated [68]. Furthermore, REI’s possess remarkable
skills with regards to diagnosis in addition to management of
early pregnancies in view of earlier determination of pregnancy
through TVS amongst 5-7 wks is correlated with remarkably
lesser risk of maternal morbidity to contrast to diagnosis in
addition to treatment initiation at over 9 weaks GA (5.9 vs
32.4%, odds ratio 0.14; 95% CI:0.1-0.4) [69].
On successful resolution of caesarean scar pregnancy is attained
need for caesarean scar defect repair is there in case the patient
wants a further pregnancy. Handling of these kind of patients is
preferably done by the REI’s in view of their surgical experience
with the acknowledged fact of escalated bleeding along with
need for hysterectomy occasionally as well.
Besides, the risk of implantation in the following pregnancy
caesarean scars niches have been known to be correlated
with a considerably diminished successful IVF along with
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycle (15.9% vis a vis
23.3% OR:0.6; 95% CI :0.5-0.9) [70]. It has been posited to take
place in view of alterations in endometrial receptivity, tough
embryo transfer, dysfunctional myometrialcontractility as well
as embryotoxic blood components getting trapped within this
niche. There is no clarification regarding the revision has any
correlation with escalation of reproductive outcomes, reduction
in recurrence rates or alterations in placenta accreta spectrum
condition.
Reproductive Surgery Future
Transplanting uterus: Absolute Uterine Factor Infertility (AUFI)
impact less than 5% of women are in the reproductive age [71].
Of those having presentation in the form of AUFI earlier other
than IVF with the utilization of a gestational carrier used to
be the exclusive manner of attaining a biologically correlated
child. Nevertheless, utilization of a gestational carrier is not
legal throughout the world, expensive where legally allowed
in addition to not aiding the woman to get the satisfaction of
bearing a pregnancy in her own body. Transplanting uterus
was illustrated to be a plausible manner for getting over this
problem,giving a newer archetype for patients with AUFI.
Page 31 of 36
Volume 4 • Issue 2 • 37
Citation: Kaur KK, Allahbadia GN, Singh M. The Role of Reproductive Surgeons/Surgery has Got Rekindled with Plateauing of IVF Results and Advances in Technology:
A Comprehensive Narrative Review. J Obst Gynecol Surg. 2023;4(2):25-36. doi: 10.52916/jogs234037
J Obst Gynecol Surg,
ISSN: 2583-5912
with utilization of resorbable interrupted sutures with out need
of the colpotomy in addition to mobilization of pelvic vessels
might be possible from technical angle [84].
Probably the maximum attractive surgical gadget for
conservation of fertility would be cryopreservation of in
addition to transplantation. The first frozen thawed ovarian
tissue transplantation was conducted in 1999 [85]. As detected
by 2019 it has been determined that greater than 130 live births
have been attained [86]. From technical angle this procedure
implicates laparoscopic excision of the ovarian cortex strips
which undergo processing followed by cryopreservation. The
tissue which has been thawed its implantation can bedone
orthotopically into the remnant of ovary or other regions
in the pelvis for instance ovarian fossa or broad ligaments/
heterotopically. Canonically heterotopic transplantation
is conducted in the retroperitoneum with in the pelvis or
abdominal wall with the clearcut benefit of easy accessibility for
ultimate ovarian stimulation or when, robust pelvic adhesions
or disease is present which results in avoidance of heteropic
transplantation. Just 1 live birth has been documented
subsequent to heterotopic transplantation in a patient in which
bilateral oophorectomy had been conducted [87]. One of the
problems with heterotopic transplantation is viability of graft
with regards to tissue tension, temperature along with blood
supply of the rest.
Finally, the future endeavour for ovarian tissue transplantation
would be the capacity of safe conservation along with
transplantation of whole ovaries-specifically in case of
prepubertal women who usually do not possess enough tissue
mass for conservation of ovarian cortex strips. Two significant
problems that are having requirement for overcoming for its
viability:
• we need improvement of our capacity of processing as well
as cryopreservation of solid organs in the manner which
ensures least tissue injury.
• requirement for generating greater successful manner for
ensuring revascularization of the tissues at the time of
transplantation.The utilization of extracellular tissue matrix
scaffolds are getting actively evaluated with regards to
ensuring least reperfusion injury in addition to maximizing
tissue viability as well as growth during transplantation
time .
Innovative Upcoming Procedures Along With Gadgets
Vaginal natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopy (vNOTES):
The invention of Bonney’s clamp with regards to uterine artery
ligation aided the reproductive surgeons in their capacity of
surgical performance in the presence of a considerably vascular
uterus aided in the generation of numerous innovative surgical
strategies. In these modern days innovative minimally invasive
surgical approaches have made it further indiminishing the
already least scar strategy to a single scar or further no abdominal
scar. Laparoscopy with a single port in addition to Vaginal Natural
Orifice Transluminal Endoscopy (vNOTES) represent innovative
procedures whose indications are enhancing. Furthermore
vNOTES possesses remarkable probability in surgical tackling
of ovarian torsion, Ectopic pregnancies in the tube along with
ovarian cystectomy as well.
having gone through pelvic radiotherapy for cervical, anal or
uterine cancer had gone through ovarian transpositions [81].
Apart from ovaries the other organs in the pelvis that are
radiation sensitive are inclusive of injury to the uterus along with
endometrium in particular myometrial fibrosis, uterine vascular
injury as well as endometrial injury that might restrict successful
implantation in addition to live birth [82]. The first patient who
had uterine transposition as well as fixation was conducted
in case of a 26 year old patient having rectal adenocarcinoma
by Ribeiro R of Brazil in 2017 for conferring protection to both
uterus along with ovaries from adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy
prior to rectosigmoidectomy [83]. Total mobilization of uterus
along with ovarian pedicles, colpotomy in addition to placement
in the upper abdomen was implicated in this procedure.
Subsequent to fixation to the anterior abdominal wall, the cervix
was anastamosed with the fascia of the umbilicus with regards
to aiding in the efflux of the menstruation. In this particular early
patient reported uterus was reimplanted into the pelvis 18mths
subsequent to pelvic radiotherapy when her menstrual cycle
resumption occurred regularly. Despite, this surgical procedure
might be out of the realm of REI’s, a simpler procedure where
involvement of uterine fixations tothe anterior abdominal wall
Page 32 of 36
Figure 7: Courtesy ref no-2: Demonstration of ovarian transposition in a
prepubescent girl. (A): Demonstrates the left ovary that is sutured to the
abdominal wall with a non-resorbable suture; and (B): demonstrated the
ovary aftertransposition to the left paracolic gutters. (From Irtan, et al. [78].
Reprinted by permission of the publisher.)
Volume 4 • Issue 2 • 37
Citation: Kaur KK, Allahbadia GN, Singh M. The Role of Reproductive Surgeons/Surgery has Got Rekindled with Plateauing of IVF Results and Advances in Technology:
A Comprehensive Narrative Review. J Obst Gynecol Surg. 2023;4(2):25-36. doi: 10.52916/jogs234037
J Obst Gynecol Surg,
ISSN: 2583-5912
Insufficiency (POI), or conditions like turners syndrome patients
oocyte cryopreservation might help. In view of their angiogenic
in addition to anti apoptotic characteristics [91]. Besides
MSC’s therapies for POI, other workers are evaluating thepart
of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) for restoration of the ovarian
working along with enhancement of IVF success rates [92-95].
Requirement for gaining insight in generating greater safety
along with effectiveness of these innovative procedures prior
to their utilization in the form of therapeutic strategies is there.
References
1. Feinberg EC, Levens ED, DeCherney AH. Infertility surgery is
dead:only obituaryremains. Fertil Steril. 2008;89(1):232-236.
2. Bortoletto P , Romanski PA, Petrozza JC, et al. Reproductive
Surgery:revisiting its origins and role in the modern management
of infertility. Fertil Steril. 2023;120(3):539-550.
3. Sutton C. Hysterectomy:a historical perspective. Bailliers Clin
Obstet Gynaecol. 1997;11(1):1-22.
4. Speert H. Obstetrics and Gynaecology in America:a
history.Chicago.Ill: American College of Obstetricians and
Gynaecologists.1980.
5. Chamberlain G. The master of myomectomy. J R Soc Med.
2003;96(6):302-304.
6. Semm K. New methods of pelviscopy (Gynaecologic
laparoscopy for myomectomy, ovariectomy, tubectomy and
adnectomy. Endoscopy. 1979;11(2):85-93.
7. Advincula AP , Song A, BurkeW, et al. Preliminary
experiencewith robotic assisted laparoscopic myomectomy. J
Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004;11(4):511-518.
Radiofrequency ablation: Apart from innovative newer
strategies, further innovative treatment models for instance
utilization of Radiofrequency Ablation (RFA) for uterine
leiomyomas. Additionally, RFA tries to stimulate coagulative
necrosis amongst a myoma for attaining reduction in volume
of the myoma, thereby myoma correlated symptoms [88]. At
present 2 gadgets accessibility is in US namely–Acessa (Hologic)
as well as Sonata (Gynesonics) systems, where utilization of
laparoscopic in addition to transcervical strategy respectively.
Nevertheless, these gadgets are just acknowledged for
utilization in symptomatic fibroids in case of patients who
do not want any future fertility. Moreover RFA portrays an
intriguing procedure, in view of no requirement for myometrial
incisions/sutures; however in an akin fashion tissue diagnosis
is also not aided or resection of the myoma tissue. There are
scarce outcomes accessible with regards to reproductive results
in reproductive aged women wanting fertility. Recently, Polin, et
al. [89], conducted a systematic review, where they isolated 50
pregnancies subsequent to 923 RFA patients (10 transcervical
as well as 40 laparoscopic). Of these there were 6 spontaneous
miscarriages (12%) along with 44 full term pregnancies (88%)
with just 2 revealed complications, placenta praevia, along
with, Post Partum Haemorrhage (PPH), with degenerated
myoma getting expelled. There were no uterine ruptures,
no invasive placentation or documented preterm delivery.
Greater outcomes are required for making sure with regards
to safety in addition to effectiveness of RFA for patients with
uterine fibroids who want any future fertility. Till we manage
to get such outcomes, their part in reproductive aged women
continues to be restricted. Their part in case of adenomyomas
or diffuse adenomyosis also continue to be probable answers
where present surgical procedures are substantially morbid as
well as medical treatment inefficacious for women who want
future fertility.
Regenerative medicine: Another field which is the attractive is
the utilization of regenerative treatment for instance stem cells
for abrogating endometrial damage. Intrauterine adhesions
occur in view of injury to the regenerative layer of the uterine
lining/endometrium. On robust injury, there is depletion of
the capacity of endometrium to heal in addition to lead to
regrowth of the normal overlying stratum functional is. The
present standard of hysteroscopic breakdown of adhesions
got generated by REI’s, with the idea of restoration of the
normal architecture of theuterine cavity. Stem cell treatment in
combination with tissue engineering 3D scaffolds possess the
capacityof restoration of thebasalis layer which got injured from
dilatation and curettage/myomectomy. At present, endometrial,
mesenchymal, bone marrow, along withumbilical stem cells
have been documented to possess a positive action on the
healing of the damaged endometrium [90]. It has not been
acknowledged with regards to use of these therapies would be
for primary avoidance subsequent to surgery for patients with
susceptibility to adhesions formation or in the form of secondary
avoidance for the ones already having prior disease. Attempts
have been made in regenerating other reproductive tissues
is attractive in restoration of normal reproductive working on
advancement of age. Active assessment of Mesenchymal Stem
Cells (MSC’s) in their utilization in case of Premature Ovarian.
Page 33 of 36
Volume 4 • Issue 2 • 37
Citation: Kaur KK, Allahbadia GN, Singh M. The Role of Reproductive Surgeons/Surgery has Got Rekindled with Plateauing of IVF Results and Advances in Technology:
A Comprehensive Narrative Review. J Obst Gynecol Surg. 2023;4(2):25-36. doi: 10.52916/jogs234037
J Obst Gynecol Surg,
ISSN: 2583-5912
26. Osada H. Uterine adenomyosis and adenomyoma:the
surgical approach. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):406-417.
27. Kaur KK, Allahbadia GN, Singh M. Dilemna regarding
preference of surgery or medical treatment in case of tubal
blockade ,endometriosis or adenomyosis and pelvic adhesion
prevention once surgery is contemplated –a systematic review.
J Gynaecol Androl Reprod Med. 2020.
28. Hendricks ML, Ket CF, Hampes PGA, et al. Why does ovarian
surgery in PCOS help? insight into the endocrine implications
of ovarian surgery in Polycystic ovary syndrome. Hum Reprod
Update. 2007;13(3):249-264.
29. Stein IF, Leventhal ML. Amenorrhoea associated with
bilateral Polycystic ovary syndrome. Am J Obstet Gynaecol.
1935:29(2):181-191.
30. Gjonnaess H. Polycystic ovary syndrometreated
byelectrocautery. Fertil Steril. 1984;41(1):20-25.
31. Bordewijk EM, Ng KYB, Rakic K, et al. Laparoscopic Ovarian
drilling for ovulation inductionin women with anovulatory
Polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2020;2(2):CD001122.
32. Amer SA, Shamy TTE, James C, et al. The impact of
laparoscopic ovarian drilling on AMH and ovarian reserve:a
meta-analysis. Reprod Camb Engl. 2017;154(1):R13-R21.
33. Flyckt R, Goldberg JM. Laparoscopic Ovarian drilling for
clomiphene resistant Polycystic ovary syndrome. Semin Reprod
Med. 2011;29(2):138-146.
34. Russell WW. Aberrant portion of the mullerian duct found in
the ovary. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 1979:134:225-226.
35. Lee D, Kim SK, Lee JR, et al. Management of Endometriosis-
related infertility: considerations and treatment options. Clin
Exp Reprod Med. 2020;47(1):1-11.
36. Kitajima M, Dolmans MM, Donnez O, et al. Enhanced
follicular recruitment atresia in cortex derived ovaries with
endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(4):1031-1037.
37. Zhang Y , Zhang S, Zhao Z, et al. Impact of cystectomy versus
ablation for endometrioma on ovarian reserve:a systematic
review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2022;118(6):1172-1182.
38. Muzil L, Achilli C, Lecce F, et al. Second surgery for recurrent
endometriomas is more harmfulto healthy ovarian tissue and
ovarian reserve than First surgery. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(3):738-
743.
39. Muzil L, Achilli C, Bergamini V, et al. Comparison between
the stripping technique and the combined excisional /ablative
technique for the treatment of bilateral ovarian endometriomas:a
multicentre RCT. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(2):339-344.
40. Zhang NN, Sun TS,Yang Q. An effective water injection-
assistedmethod for excision of ovarian endometriomas by
laparoscopy. Fertil Steril. 2019;112(3):608-609.
41. Candiani GB, Ottolina J, Posadzka E, et al. Asssessment
of ovarian reserve after Cystectomy versus’’ one step’’ laser
vaporization in the treatment of ovarian endometriomas:a
small randomized Clinical trial . Hum Reprod. 2018;33(12):2205-
22011.
42. Cohen A, Almog B, Tulandi T. Sclerotherapy in the
7. Metwally M, Reybould G, Cheong YC, et al. Surgical treatment
of fibroids for subfertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2020;2020(1):CD003857.
8. Penzias A, Bendikson K, Butts S, et al. Removal of myomas
in asymptomptomatic patients to fertility and/or reduce
miscarriage rates. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):416-425.
9. Coutinho LM, Assis WA, Spagnuolo-Souza A, et al. Uterine
fibroids and pregnancy: how do they affect each other. Reprod
Sci. 2022;29(8):2145-2151.
10. Pritts EA. Fibroids and infertility: a systematic review of the
evidence. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2009;91(4):1215-1223.
11. Neuwirth RS, Amin HK. Excision of submucus fibroids with
hysteroscopiccontrol. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 1976:126(1):95-99.
12. Barbosa PA, Villaescusa M, Andres MP , et al. How to
minimize bleeding in laparoscopic myomectomy. Curr Opin
Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;33(4):255-261.
13. Parazzini F, Tozzi L, Bianchi S. Pregnancy outcome and uterine
fibroids. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;34(7):74-84.
14. Dolmans MM, Isaacsons K, Zhang W, et al. Intramural
myomas more than 3-4 cm in size should be surgically removed
before invitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(4):945-958.
15. Kaur KK, Allahbadia GN, Singh M. Need for Removal of
Fibroids Prior to IVF in ImprovingSuccess Rates - A Short
Commentary. J Gynecol. 2018;3(2):000157.
16. Rackow BW, Taylor HS. Submucosal uterine leiomyomas
havea global effect on molecular determinants of endometrial
receptivity. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(6):2027-2034.
17. Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Nezhat C. Endometriosis: Ancient disease,
Ancient treatments. Fertil Steril. 2012;98(Suppl):S1-S62.
18. Junod SW, Marks L. Women’s trial: the approval of the first
Oral contraceptives pill in the United States and Great Britain. J
Hist Med Allied Sci. 2002;57(2):117-160.
19. Goldberg JM, Falcone T, Diamond MP . Current controversies
in tubal disease ,endometriosis and pelvic adhesion. Fertil Steril.
2019;112(3):417-425.
20. Riley KA, Benton AS, Diemling TA, et al. Surgical excision
versus ablation for superficial endometriosis-associated pain
:a randomized controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynaecol.
2019;26(1):71-77.
21. Marcoux S, Maheux R, Berube S. Canadian Collaborative
group on minimal endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(4):217-
222.
22. Practice Committee of the American Society of Reproductive
Medicine. Endometriosis and infertility:a Committee opinion.
Fertil Steril. 2012;98(3):591-598.
23. Practice Committee of the American Society of Reproductive
Medicine. Fertility evaluation ofinfertile women:a Committee
opinion. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(5):1255-1265.
24. Kaur KK, Allahbadia GN, Singh M. Current Role of Surgery in
Endometriosis; Indications and Progress. Surg Med Open Acc J.
2018;1(4):1-7.
25. Van Pragh I. Conservative surgical treatment for Adenomyosis
uteri in young women: local excision and metroplasty. Can Med
Assoc J. 1965;93(22):1174-1175.
Page 34 of 36
Volume 4 • Issue 2 • 37
Citation: Kaur KK, Allahbadia GN, Singh M. The Role of Reproductive Surgeons/Surgery has Got Rekindled with Plateauing of IVF Results and Advances in Technology:
A Comprehensive Narrative Review. J Obst Gynecol Surg. 2023;4(2):25-36. doi: 10.52916/jogs234037
J Obst Gynecol Surg,
ISSN: 2583-5912
60. Kaur KK, Allahbadia GN, Singh M. An Update on the
Advances in Classification as well as Reproductive Surgeries in
Mullerian Anomalies - A Systematic Review. Am J Surg Tech Case
Rep. 2020;1(1):1002.
61. Kaur KK, Allahbadia GN, Singh M. An Update on the
Causes of Primaryand Secondary Amenorrhea alongwith
Aetiopathogenesis and Therapeutic Management. Avid Science
Monograph Series. 2016;1-87.
62. Ingram JM. The bicycle seat stool in the treatment of
vaginal agenesis and stenosis: a preliminary report. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 1981;140:867-873.
63. Rall K, Schenk B, Schaffeler N, et al. Long term findings
concerning the mental and physical condition, quality of life and
sexuality after laparoscopically assisted creation of a neovagina
(modified Vecchietti technique) in young MRKHS (Mayer-
Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome) patients. J Clin Med.
2021;10:1269.
64. Dolinko AV, Vrees RA, Fishman GN. Non tubal ectopic
pregnancies: overview and treatment via local injection. J
Minim Invasive Gynaecol. 2018;25:287-296.
65. Yamaguchi M, Honda R, Uchino K, et al. Transverse vaginal
methotrexate injection for the treatment of caesarean scar
pregnancy: efficacy and subsequent fecundity. J Minim Invasive
Gynaecol. 2014;21:877-883.
66. Fylstra DL. Ectopic pregnancy within a caesarean scar: a
review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2002;57: 537-543.
67. Miller R, Timor-Tritsch IE, Gyamfi Bannerman C. Society for
Maternal -Fetal Medicine (SFMM) consult series#49 caesarean
scar pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020:222:82-114.
68. Timor-Tritsch IE, Buca D, Di MascioD, et al. Outcomes
of caesarean scar pregnancy according to gestation age at
diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet
Gynaecol Reprod Biol. 2021;258:53-59.
69. Vissers J, Sluckin TC, van Driel Delprat CCR, et al. Reduced
pregnancy and live birth rates after in vitro fertilization in
women with a previous caesarean section: a retrospective
cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2020;35:595-604.
70. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30196945/.
71. Branstrom M, Johanneson L, Bokstrom H, et al. Live birth
afteruterus transplantation. Lancet. 2015;385:607-616.
72. Flyckt R, Falcone T, Quintini C, et al. First birth from a
deceased donor uterus in the United States: From severe graft
rejection to successful caesarean delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2020: 223:143-151.
73. Ricci S, Bennett C, Falcone T. Uterine transplantation:
evolving data, success, and Clinical importance. J Minim Invasive
Gynaecol. 2021;28:502-512.
74. Johanneson L, Richards EG, Reddy V, et al. The first 5 years
of uterus transplant in the US: a report from the United States
uterus transplant Consortium. JAMA Surg. 2022; 157:790-797.
75. McCall ML, Kealy EC, Thompson JD. Conservation of ovarian
tissue in the treatment of carcinoma cervix with radical surgery.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1958;75:590-600.
76. Damewood MD, Grochow LB. Prospects for fertility after
management of ovarian endometrioma: systematic review and
meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(1):117-124.
43. Kaur KK, Allahbadia GN, Singh M. Management of Inoperable
Recurrent Endometrioma Presenting as Severe Incapacitating
Pain Following Leuprolide Acetate Depot by Aspiration, Recurring
Again a 2 Yrs Subsequently for Sclerosing Therapy at Present: A
Case Report. Sun Text Rev Case Rep Image. 2020;1(1):107.
44. Surgical treatment of theovaries and fallopian tubes including
tubal pregnancy. Bristol Medico Chir. 1896;14(54):353-354.
45. Mulligan WJ. Results of salpingostomy. Int J Fertil.
1966;11(4):424-430.
46. Swolin K. Ertilit€atsoperationen. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand.
1967;46:234–250.
47. https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/
interactive/2012/12/30/magazine/the-lives-they-lived-2012.
html?view%C2%BCLesley_Brown.
48. Gomel V. From laparotomy to laparoscopy to in vitro
fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2019;112:183-196.
49. Boeckxstaens A, Devroey P , Collins J, et al. Getting pregnant
after tubal sterilization: surgical reversal or IVF? Hum Reprod.
2007;22:2660-2664.
50. Society for assisted reproductive technology. American
Society of Reproductive Medicine. Assisted reproductive
technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from
the American Society of Reproductive Medicine/ Society
for assisted reproductive technology registry. Fertil Steril.
2007;87:1253-1266.
51. Pfeiffer SM, Attaran M, Goldstein I, et al. ASRM Mullerian
anomalies classification in 2021. Fertil Steril. 2021;116:1238-
1252.
52. Rikken JF, Kowalik CR, Emanuel MH, et al. Septum resection
for women of reproductive age with a septate uterus. Cochrane
Database Sys Rev. 2017;1:CD008576.
53. Rikken JFW, Kowalik CR, Emanuel MH, et al. The randomized
uterine septum transaction trial (TRUST) design and protocol.
BMC Womens Health. 2018;18(1):163.
54. Fedele L, Biachi S, Zanconato G, et al. Laparoscopic removal
of the cavitated non communicating rudimentary uterine horn:
surgical aspects in 10 cases. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:432-436.
55. Fedele L, Dorta M, Brioschi D, et al. Magnetic resonance
imaging inMayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Obstet
Gynecol. 1990;76:593-596.
56. Frank RT. Formation of artificial vagina without operation.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1938;35:1053.
57. Veronikis DK, McClure GB, Nichols DH. The Vecchietti
operation for constructing a neovagina: indications,
instrumentation, and techniques. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:301-
304.
58. Wabrek AJ, Millard PR, Wilson WB Jr, et al. Creation of a
neovagina by the Frank nonoperative method. Obstet Gynecol.
1971;37:408-413.
59. Costa EM, Mendonca BB, Inacio M, et al. Management
of ambiguous genitaliain pseudohermaphrodites: new
perspectiveson vaginal dilation. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:229-232.
Page 35 of 36
Volume 4 • Issue 2 • 37
Citation: Kaur KK, Allahbadia GN, Singh M. The Role of Reproductive Surgeons/Surgery has Got Rekindled with Plateauing of IVF Results and Advances in Technology:
A Comprehensive Narrative Review. J Obst Gynecol Surg. 2023;4(2):25-36. doi: 10.52916/jogs234037
J Obst Gynecol Surg,
ISSN: 2583-5912
87. Luo X, Shen Y , Song WX, et al. Pathological evaluation of
uterine leiomyoma as treated with radio frequency Ablation. Int
J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;99:9-13.
88. Polin M, Hur HC. Radio frequency Ablation of uterine
myomas and pregnancy Outcomes: an updated review of
literature. J Minim Invasive Gynaecol. 2022;29:709-715.
89. Lv Q, Wang L, Luo X, et al. Adult stem cells in endometrial
regeneration: molecular insights and Clinical applications. Mol
Reprod Dev. 2021;88:379-394.
90. Fu YX, Ji J, Shan F, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells
treatment of premature ovarian failure:new challenges and
opportunities. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12:161.
91. Gao M, Yu Z, Yao D, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells therapy: a
promising method for the treatment of uterine scars premature
ovarian failure. Tissue Cell. 2022;74:101674.
92. Kaur KK, Allahbadia GN, Singh M. An Update on Management
of Oncofertility-Does the Use of Vsels Appear Practical in the
Near Future in Human Malignancies Replacing Cortical Tissue/
Testicular Tissue. Int J Stem Cell Regenerat Med. 2019;1(1):103.
93. Kaur KK, Allahbadia GN, Singh M. Autologous Platelet Rich
Plasma (PRP): A Possibility of becoming a revolutionary therapy
in the field of Gynaecology and reproductive Endocrinology and
Infertility- A Systematic Review, Progress in Women's Health
Care, 2019;1(1):1-13.
94. Kaur KK, Allahbadia GN, Singh M. Fertility preservation in
turners syndrome patients-safety issues and problems of the X
chromosomal content of granulosa cells-will it hinder oocytes
development still needs Clarification- A short communication.
Arch Repr Med Sex Health. 2019;2(2):9-12.
95. Munro MG, Critchley HOD, Fraser IS, et al. The two FIGO
systems for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding symptoms
and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in
the reproductive years: 2018 revisions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet.
2018;143:393-408.
chemotherapy or radiation for neoplastic disease. Fertil Steril.
1986;45:443-459.
77. Irtan S, Orbach D, Helfre S, et al. Ovarian transpositions
in prepubescent and girls with cancer. Lancet Oncol.
2013;14:e601-e608.
78. Gubbala K, Laios A, Gallos I, et al. Outcomes of ovarian
transpositions in Gynaecological cancers: A systematic review
and meta-analysis. J Ovarian Res. 2014;7:69.
79. McLaren JF, Bates GW. Fertility preservation in women
of reproductive age with cancers. Am J Obstet Gynecol.
2012;207:455-467.
80. Seltzer J, Belcht LCG, Huang Y , et al. Utilization of ovarian
transpositions for fertility preservation among young women
with pelvicmalignancies who undergo radiotherapy. Am J Obstet
Gynecol. 2018;219:415-417.
81. Critchley HOD, Bath LE, Wallace WHB. Radiation damage
to the uterus- review of the effects of treatment of childhood
cancers. Hum Fertil. 2002;5: 61-66.
82. RibeiroR, Ribolho JC, Tsumanuma FK, et al. Uterine
transpositions: technique and. case report. Fertil Steril.
2017;108:320-324.
83. Azais H, Canova CH, Vesale E, et al. Laparoscopic uterine
fixation to spare fertility before pelvic radiation therapy. Fertil
Steril. 2018;110:974-975.
84. Oktay K, Karlikaya G. Ovarianfn after transplantation
of frozen, banked autologous ovarian tissue. N Engl J Med.
2000;342:1919.
85. Donnez J, Dolmans MM. Fertility preservation in women. N
Engl J Med. 2017;377:1657-1665.
86. Stern CJ, Gook D, Hale LG, et al. First reported Clinical
pregnancy following heteropic grafting of cryopreserved ovarian
tissue in a woman after bilateral oophorectomy. Hum Reprod.
2013;28: 2996-2999.
Page 36 of 36