Intro
Endometriosis is a common disease characterized by the growth of endometrial tissue (which
normally lines the uterus) outside the uterine cavity. 1 The estimated prevalence of endometriosis in women of reproductive age is 2% to 11%
in Europe and the United States 2 , 3 and 12% in China. 4 The symptoms of endometriosis vary among patients and disease extent 5 but usually include painful periods (dysmenorrhea), chronic pelvic pain, pain with
intercourse (dyspareunia), and infertility. 1 , 6 , 7 Endometriosis exerts a considerable impact on health-related quality of life, 8 and the variable presentation often leads to a delay in diagnosis. 9 , 10 Currently, there are no curative treatment strategies for endometriosis other than
laparoscopic surgery. Although endometriotic lesions can be removed by conservative surgery,
the disease can recur in 30% to 50% of women. 11 , 12
Endometriotic lesions may be characterized into 3 phenotypes based on localization and
histology: superficial peritoneal endometriosis (SUP), cystic ovarian endometriosis or
endometrioma (OMA), and deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). 13 – 15 These 3 phenotypes can occur either individually or in combination in the same
patient. The pathogenesis of endometriosis remains poorly understood but is thought to
involve a variety of mechanisms. 16 Indeed, hormonal, inflammatory, immunologic, genetic, epigenetic, and environmental
factors have all been reported to be associated with endometriosis. 17 – 26 In addition, some studies have suggested that endometriosis may be related to dietary
as well as early-life factors (including exposure to environmental toxic agents). 27 – 30 Nevertheless, the SUP, OMA, and DIE phenotypes of endometriosis may have different
origins and pathogenetic mechanisms, and there is only limited information regarding the
factors associated with these phenotypes in the Chinese population.
The recently published FEELING (Factors associated with the development of Endometrioma and
dEep infiLtratING endometriosis) study was a case–control study of 1008 patients in 3
countries (China, Russia, and France), designed to investigate the clinical, lifestyle, and
environmental factors associated with OMA and DIE versus SUP and no endometriosis. 31 The FEELING study identified several factors associated with OMA and DIE, including
previous use of hormonal treatment for endometriosis, previous surgery for endometriosis,
and living or working in a city or by a busy area. 31 In addition, substantial differences among regions were noted regarding the
diagnosis, symptomatology, and management of endometriosis. 31
The aim of the present study was to perform a subgroup analysis of data from women in China
who were enrolled in the FEELING study in order to investigate the factors associated with
different phenotypes of endometriosis, with a focus for early-life factors.
Methods
This is a subgroup analysis of the FEELING study 31 for the 546 participants in China enrolled between May 2011 and April 2013 to
identify early-life exposure factors associated with OMA and/or DIE. The criteria for
inclusion and diagnosis of SUP, OMA, and DIE were described in the FEELING study ( NCT01351051 ). 13 – 15 , 31 The women who underwent gynecological surgery for a benign in the past 3 months
were considered for recruitment. Deep infiltrating endometriosis was considered in the
presence of endometrial tissue infiltrating beneath the peritoneal surface for >5 mm 15 or when the muscularis was infiltrated. 14 The patients were classified according to the more severe lesion (SUP, OMA, and the DIE). 13
All patients provided informed written consent before participating in the study. The
study was approved by the regional independent ethics committees/institutional review
boards and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
One case report form and 2 questionnaires were collected from each participant in a
face-to-face interview with the investigator at the first postsurgical routine visit. Data
regarding symptoms and previous medical history, including endometriosis history,
presurgical symptoms, details of surgery for endometriosis, endometriosis status,
additional gynecologic and medical history, and family medical history, were obtained
retrospectively using an internet-based electronic data capture (EDC) case report form.
Information regarding current habits, including environment, dietary habits, and health
and mood during the postsurgical visit, was collected prospectively using a
participant-completed questionnaire. Finally, an investigator-completed EDC questionnaire
was used to obtain extra information regarding their age, gender, years in practice in
gynecology, practice site information, number of newly diagnosed patients with
endometriosis per year, total number of endometriosis cases followed per year, and number
of assisted reproductive technologies for endometriosis per year. No safety evaluations
were undertaken as this was a noninterventional study.
The main objective of this study was to identify early-life exposure factors associated
with OMA and/or DIE. For the purposes of the primary analysis, SUP and non-EM were
considered as control cases while OMA and DIE were considered as definite disease. The
rationale for this was that the clinical significance of SUP remains unclear, with some
authors arguing that it may not represent true endometriotic disease. 16 , 32 , 33
As DIE is the less frequent form of endometriosis, the sample size in the original
FEELING study was determined according to DIE 31 : assuming that the frequency of associated factors in the population is 10% and a
dropout rate of 20%, the inclusion of 1008 participants allowed the detection of odds
ratios (ORs) ≥2 with a significance level of 5% and a power of 90%.
A descriptive statistical analysis was applied. Continuous data were expressed as means
(standard deviation) or medians (quartile, maximum value, and minimum value), as
appropriate. Categorical variables were expressed as n (%).
Univariable logistic regression analyses were performed to screen for factors potentially
associated with OMA and/or DIE. Subsequently, multivariable regression analysis was
carried out using a significance level of 10% for entry of variables into the model and a
significance level of 5% to retain variables in the model. The Hosmer-Lemeshow
goodness-of-fit test was applied to the final selected model, and ORs with 95% confidence
intervals (CIs) were calculated. The ORs were considered significant when their associated
CI excluded 1.0. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Of
note, associations with borderline P values ( P =
.03-.05) should be interpreted with caution. All statistical analyses were performed using
SAS software version 9.1 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina).
Results
A total of 546 women were enrolled in China, 156 (28.6%) in the non-EM group, 156 (28.6%)
in the SUP group, 156 (28.6%) in the OMA group, and 78 (14.3%) in the DIE group. The
baseline characteristics of the enrolled participants are presented in Table 1 .
Baseline Characteristics of the Study Participants. a
a Data presented as n (%) unless otherwise stated.
b A union that lacks any publicly recognized bond.
c N = 546, except N = 545 (data missing for 1 participant).
Clinical, lifestyle, and environmental factors found by univariable analyses to be
potentially associated with endometriosis are presented in Table 2 . Compared with participants in the non-EM
and SUP groups, factors associated with OMA and DIE were noncyclic chronic pelvic pain (OR
= 2.30, 95% CI: 1.40-3.78), more severe dysmenorrhea (class 1-4: OR = 2.77, 95% CI:
1.77-4.34; class 5-7: OR = 3.31, 95% CI: 2.00-5.46; class 8-10: OR = 6.96, 95% CI:
4.02-12.07), deep dyspareunia (OR = 3.09, 95% CI: 1.81-5.27), gastrointestinal symptoms
during menstruation (OR = 3.40, 95% CI: 2.23-5.19), urinary symptoms during menstruation
(OR = 4.34, 95% CI: 1.91-9.85), previous surgical diagnosis of endometriosis (OR = 7.07,
95% CI: 3.10-16.14), previous hormonal treatment of endometriosis (OR = 22.32, 95% CI:
7.97-62.52), previous uterine surgery (OR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.03-2.39), longer time since
menarche (OR = 1.47, 95% CI: 1.06-2.03), more regular menstrual cycle (OR = 0.37, 95% CI:
0.17-0.84), no previous use of a progestin-only oral contraceptive (OR = 0.26, 95% CI:
0.07-0.90), previous pregnancy (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.00-2.02), not having been breastfed
(OR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.26-0.88), endometriosis in a first-degree relative (OR = 4.12, 95%
CI: 1.10-15.39), and higher alcohol consumption (OR = 9.83, 95% CI: 1.02-95.06; Table 2 ).
Univariable Analysis of the Factors Associated With OMA and DIE.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; DIE, deep
infiltrating endometriosis; Non-EM, no endometriosis; OMA, endometrioma; OR, odds
ratio; SD, standard deviation; SUP, superficial peritoneal endometriosis.
a Odds ratio expressed for a 10-unit increment in age.
b A union that lacks any publicly recognized bond.
The following variables were entered into the multivariable analysis: addition of salt to
cooking, premature birth, not having been breastfed, gastrointestinal symptoms during
menstruation, health status, endometriosis in a first-degree relative, menstrual cycle
regularity, living in a city or by a busy area, practicing vaginal douching, previous
uterine surgery, progestin-only oral contraceptive pill, smoking status, stress level,
previous hormonal treatment for endometriosis, infertility, and previous surgical
diagnosis of endometriosis. The multivariable analysis identified the following factors as
independently associated with OMA and DIE: not having been breastfed (OR = 0.33, 95% CI:
0.16-0.69), previous hormonal treatment for endometriosis (OR = 17.95, 95% CI:
5.92-54.43), gastrointestinal symptoms during menstruation (OR = 3.18, 95% CI: 1.90-5.31),
not living in a city or by a busy area (OR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.27-3.60), not having
infertility (OR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.34-0.87), previous surgical diagnosis of endometriosis
(OR = 3.18, 95% CI: 1.90-5.31), regular menstrual cycles (OR = 0.36, 95% CI: 0.13-0.96),
and not practicing vaginal douching (OR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.16-0.97; Table 3 ). Among the identified factors, the only
one related to early-life exposure was not having been breastfed, and we subjected it to
further robustness analysis to check whether it remained a significant factor when the OMA
and DIE groups were considered separately instead of as one group.
Multivariable Analysis of the Factors Associated With OMA and DIE. a
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; DIE, deep infiltrating endometriosis;
Non-EM, no endometriosis; OMA, endometrioma; OR, odds ratio; SUP, superficial
peritoneal endometriosis.
a The Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test yielded a P
value of .789, indicating a good fit.
Further subgroup multivariable analysis confirmed not having been breastfed as a
protective factor for DIE, when compared with non-EM (OR = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.02-0.88), and
with OMA + SUP (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.04-0.85). Nevertheless, the univariable results did
not show that not having been breastfed was a protective factor for OMA, when compared
with non-EM (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.32-1.36), and with SUP (OR = 0.63, 95% CI:
0.31-1.30).
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this subgroup analysis of the population of Chinese women
from the FEELING study is the first multicenter case–control study to explore early-life
factors potentially related to different phenotypes of endometriosis. The main finding of
the present study was that having been breastfed was associated with OMA and DIE, as were
previous hormonal treatment for endometriosis, gastrointestinal symptoms during
menstruation, not living in a city or by a busy area, not having infertility, previous
surgical diagnosis of endometriosis, regular menstrual cycles, and not practicing vaginal
douching. As not having been breastfed was identified as a protective factor in the initial
Chinese substudy analysis, we performed further subgroup robustness analyses, and the
results indicated that this factor may only be a protective factor against DIE.
Only a small number of previous studies have reported the relationship between history of
having been breastfed and endometriosis in adult life. The FEELING study, on which the
present analysis is based, did not find a significant association of having been breastfed
with OMA and/or DIE when all participants from China, Russia, and France were analyzed together. 31 The subgroup analysis suggested that not having been breastfed might be protective
against DIE in participants from China but not from France or Russia, raising the intriguing
possibility of regional differences in the impact of this factor. 31 Indeed, the FEELING study noted several intercountry differences highlighting the
complex and multifactorial origins of endometriotic disease. 31
Our observation that not having been breastfed may be a protective early-life factor
against DIE in Chinese women is not in agreement with previous studies in women of other
ethnicities. Vannuccini et al investigated the influence of several intrauterine and early
neonatal exposures and found that formula feeding and prematurity were risk factors of
developing endometriosis in adult life in women from Italy. 34 Similarly, a study in Japan determined that breast-fed infants have a lower incidence
of endometriosis in adult life. 35 In contrast, another study found that perinatal factors, including breastfeeding,
might not play an important role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. 36 The reasons for the seemingly inconsistency between our results and those of other
investigations remain unknown, but there are several possibilities. One plausible
explanation is that, in China, breastfed infants might be exposed to higher levels of
environmental toxicants (such as dioxins and related compounds) that are present in breast
milk and contribute to the pathogenesis of endometriosis. 30 , 37 , 38 These toxicants have been suggested to promote endometriosis development through
various mechanisms, including epigenetic mechanisms that alter the expression of hormone receptors. 30 , 37 – 40 Unfortunately, being a first child or not was not collected as a variable and could
not be analyzed in terms of higher exposure to toxicants. Another possibility is that
formula milk used in China may differ from that used in the other countries where the
previous studies were conducted. Two studies (in the United States and Europe) reported that
having been fed with soy formula milk increased the risk of endometriosis, and it was
suggested that this effect of formula milk might involve an augmentation in the levels of
estrogen and testosterone in the infant. 34 , 41 Thus, it is not inconceivable that lower hormone levels in formula milk in China may
have negated and even reversed any effect of formula milk on endometriosis risk. A third
potential reason is that the present study analyzed different phenotypes separately and
found the protecting effect only for DIE, while all previous studies considered different
phenotypes of endometriosis indifferently as a homogenous disease. The origins and
pathogeneses of the various endometriosis phenotypes likely differ, and many experts do not
consider SUP to represent true endometriotic disease. 16 , 32 , 33 Furthermore, studies also indicate that the potential causes for the differences
between OMA and DIE might vary in several aspects such as epithelial–mesenchymal transition,
fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transdifferentiation and smooth muscle metaplasia. 42 This variation in methodology may thus have contributed to the seemingly
inconsistency between this study and previous investigations. In addition, it cannot be
excluded that selection bias in our study may have influenced our findings, since most women
in China prefer to breastfeed their infants, and hence most participants in this study were breastfed. 43 , 44 Further research is needed to validate the association found and establish the
underlying mechanisms of the apparent protective effect of not having been breastfed against
DIE in Chinese women. Since professional women and those with higher education tend to
breastfeed their infants less in China, thus have comparatively reduced mother–infant
contact, this can be one of the potential directions to be explored in future studies.
It is perhaps not surprising that previous surgical diagnosis of endometriosis or previous
hormonal treatment of endometriosis was associated with OMA and DIE, as more severe or
deeply infiltrating disease (OMA and DIE) would be more likely to have already been
clinically detected and treated than superficial disease (ie, SUP), explaining why a higher
proportion of participants with OMA and DIE received a previous diagnosis or hormonal
therapy than participants with SUP. Furthermore, our observation that the severity of
gastrointestinal symptoms during menstruation was associated with OMA, and DIE is consistent
with previous studies showing an association between advanced endometriosis and dysmenorrhea. 45 , 46 In the FEELING study, the associations of OMA and DIE with previous surgical
diagnosis of endometriosis and previous hormonal treatment of endometriosis were found for
participants from all 3 countries, while the association with severity of gastrointestinal
symptoms during menstruation was observed in participants from both China and Russia. 31
Endometriosis is known to be associated with infertility, although the underlying
mechanisms remain unclear. 47 The observation in the present study that infertility was inversely associated with
OMA and DIE may therefore seem somewhat unexpected. However, as noted in the FEELING study, 31 infertility may have been the main indication for surgery among the non-EM/SUP cases,
explaining our finding.
It has been suggested that the prevalence of endometriosis should be low in remote rural
settings that are characterized by high fertility rate, frequent teenage pregnancy, and
protracted breastfeeding, all of which reduce the total number of menstrual cycles. 36 , 48 However, in the current study, living in a city or by a busy area appeared to be
protective against OMA and DIE. In the FEELING study, such an association was not observed
in participants from France or Russia. 31 Similarly, although the present study revealed a possible protective effect of
vaginal douching against endometriosis, no effect was observed for participants from France
or Russia in the FEELING study 31 or for women in the United States in another case–control study. 49 The reasons for these apparent inconsistencies are unknown and merit further
consideration in future research.
This study has some limitations. The sample size in this study was rather small; hence,
additional data from a larger population are needed to confirm and extend our observations.
As mentioned above, most participants in this study were breastfed, which may have
introduced a degree of selection bias. In addition, there may have been a bias against
enrollment of women in less developed areas due to a decreased willingness to undergo
medical investigations for diagnosis of the disease (eg, due to economic factors) and/or a
reduced diagnostic efficiency in rural medical centers (which have less medical expertise in
this field). Thus, the role of environmental factors may not have been fully explored.
Further prospective studies are required to confirm the conclusion of the current
research.
In conclusion, not having been breastfed was found to be a potentially protective
early-life factor against DIE in Chinese women. Further studies are warranted to confirm
this finding from an observational study, and to explore the possible underlying
mechanisms.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.