Comparison between mefenamic acid and danazol in the treatment of established menorrhagia

In: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 1989 · vol. 96(7) , pp. 840–844 · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03325.x · PMID:2765430 · W2072130754
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 35 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This study found danazol significantly reduced menstrual blood loss more than mefenamic acid, but with more adverse side-effects.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Forty women with established menorrhagia were treated with either mefenamic acid (500 mg thrice daily for 3-5 days in two cycles) or danazol (100 mg twice daily for 60 days) in an open parallel group randomized study. Mefenamic acid reduced mean menstrual blood loss from 160 ml to 127 ml (20%, P less than 0.01). Danazol reduced mean menstrual loss from 163 ml to 65 ml (60%, P less than 0.001). The percentage reduction in menstrual blood loss was significantly greater in the danazol group than in the mefenamic acid group, but the adverse side-effects occurred significantly more often in the danazol group (75%) than in the mefenamic acid group (30%, P less than 0.005). Overall, approximately half the women in each group were prepared to continue with the treatment they received to reduce their menstrual bleeding.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (14)

Cited by (35)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK