Treating Menorrhagia in Primary Care: An Overview of Drug Trials and a Survey of Prescribing Practice

In: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · 1995 · vol. 11(3) , pp. 456–471 · doi:10.1017/s0266462300008679 · PMID:7591547 · W2108814154
review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 22 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This study analyzed drug trial efficacy for menorrhagia and surveyed GPs, finding that the most effective drug, tranexamic acid, is underutilized while the least effective, norethisterone, is most frequently prescribed.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Menorrhagia can be treated by drug therapy or surgery. General practitioners (GPs) can prescribe drugs to reduce menstrual blood loss as first-line treatment, referring patients for surgical treatment if drug therapy fails. This study examined the efficacy of drugs used to treat menorrhagia and surveyed British GPs to discover the extent to which they prescribed the most effective drugs for this condition. The results suggest that treatment of this condition in primary care falls short of desirable standards. A meta-analysis of randomized trials of drug therapy revealed wide differences in efficacy and side effects. The most effective drug (tranexamic acid) is little used by British GPs, whereas the least effective drug (norethisterone) is the most frequently prescribed.
Full text 14,072 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 March 2009 Menorrhagia can be treated by drug therapy or surgery. General practitioners (GPs) can prescribe drugs to reduce menstrual blood loss as first-line treatment, referring patients for surgical treatment if drug therapy fails. This study examined the efficacy of drugs used to treat menorrhagia and surveyed British GPs to discover the extent to which they prescribed the most effective drugs for this condition. The results suggest that treatment of this condition in primary care falls short of desirable standards. A meta-analysis of randomized trials of drug therapy revealed wide differences in efficacy and side effects. The most effective drug (tranexamic acid) is little used by British GPs, whereas the least effective drug (norethisterone) is the most frequently prescribed. - Type - Special Section: The Rational Use of Therapeutic Drugs - Information - International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , Summer 1995 , pp. 456 - 471 - Copyright - Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995 1.Andersch, B., Milson, I., & Rybo, G.An objective evaluation of flurbiprofen and tranexamic acid in the treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia. Acta Obstethcia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1988, 67, 645–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed 2.Bonnar, J. Seminar on dysfunctional uterine bleeding (unpublished). London: The Royal Society of Medicine, 1994.Google Scholar 3.Callender, S., Warner, G., & Cope, E.Treatment of menorrhagia with tranexamic acid: A double-blind trial. British Medical Journal, 1970, 4, 214–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed 4.Cameron, I., Haining, R., Lumsden, M.-A., et al. The effects of mefenamic acid and norethisterone on measured menstrual blood loss. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1990, 76, 85–88.Google ScholarPubMed 5.Cameron, I., Leask, R., Kelly, R., & Baird, D.The effects of danazol, mefenamic acid, norethisterone, and a progesterone-impregnated coil on endometrial prostaglandin concentrations in women with menorrhagia. Prostaglandins, 1987, 34, 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar 6.Chamberlain, G., Freeman, R., Price, F., et al. A comparative study of ethamsylate and mefenamic acid in dysfunctional uterine bleeding. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991, 98, 707–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed 7.Chimbira, T., Anderson, A., Naish, C., et al. Reduction of menstrual blood loss by danazol in unexplained menorrhagia: Lack of effect of placebo. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1980, 87, 1152–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed 8.Chimbira, T., Anderson, A., & Turnbull, A.Relation between measured menstrual blood loss and patient's subjective assessment of loss, duration of bleeding, number of sanitary towels used, uterine weight and endometrial surface area. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1980, 87, 603–09.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed 9.Coulter, A., Klassen, A., MacKenzie, I., & McPherson, K.Diagnostic dilatation and curettage: Is it used appropriately? British Medical Journal, 1993, 306, 236–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed 10.Coulter, A., Klassen, A., & McPherson, K. How many hysterectomies should purchasers buy? European Journal of Public Health, in press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar 11.Coulter, A., & McPherson, K.The hysterectomy debate. Quarterly Journal of Social Affairs, 1986, 2, 379–96.Google Scholar 12.Davis, A., Anderson, A., & Turnbull, A.Reduction by naproxen of excessive menstrual bleeding in women using intrauterine devices. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1981, 57, 74–78.Google Scholar 13.Dockeray, C., Shephard, B., & Bonnar, J.Comparison between mefenamic acid and danazol in the treatment of established menorrhagia. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1989, 96, 840–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed 14.Fraser, I., & McCarron, G.Randomized trial of two hormonal and two prostaglandin-inhibiting agents in women with a complaint of menorrhagia. Australian New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991, 31, 66–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar 15.Fraser, I., McCarron, G., & Markham, R.A preliminary study of factors influencing perception of menstrual blood loss volume. American Journal of Obstetrics, 1984, 149, 788–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed 16.Fraser, I., Pearse, C., Shearman, R., et al. Efficacy of mefenamic acid in patients with a complaint of menorrhagia. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1981, 58, 543–51.Google ScholarPubMed 17.Gallegos, A., Aznar, R., Merino, G., & Guizer, E.Intrauterine devices and menstrual blood loss: A comparative study of eight devices during the first six months of use. Contraception, 1978, 17, 153–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar 18.Guillebaud, I., Anderson, A., & Turnball, A.Reduction by mefenamic acid of increased menstrual blood loss associated with intrauterine contraception. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1978, 85, 53–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed 19.Hall, P., MacLachlan, N., Thorn, N., et al. Control of menorrhagia by the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors naproxan sodium and mefenamic acid. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1987, 94, 554–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed 20.Hallberg, L., Hogdahl, A., Nilsson, L., & Rybo, G.Menstrual blood loss: A population study. Acta Obstetrica Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1966, 45, 320–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed 21.Hallberg, L., & Nilsson, L.Determination of menstrual blood loss. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation, 1964, 16, 244–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed 22.Harrison, R., & Campbell, S.A double-blind trial by ethamsylate in the treatment of primary and intrauterine device menorrhagia. Lancet, 1976, ii, 283–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar 23.Haynes, P., Anderson, A., & Turnbull, A.Patterns of menstrual blood loss in menorrhagia. Research and Clinical Forums, 1979, 1, 73–78.Google Scholar 24.Haynes, P., Hodgson, H., Anderson, A., & Turnbull, A.Measurement of menstrual blood loss in patients complaining of menorrhagia. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1977, 84, 763–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed 25.Higham, I., & Shaw, R.A comparative study of danazol, a regimen of decreasing doses of danazol and norethindrone in the treatment of objectively proven unexplained menorrhagia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1993, 169, 1134–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed 26.Ingemanson, C., Sikstrom, B., Rybo, G., & Bjorkman, R.Double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of diclofenac in the management of patients with IUD-related menorrhagia. Advanced Therapeutics, 1991, 8, 287–92.Google Scholar 28.Kasonde, J., & Bonnar, J.Effect of ethamsylate and aminocaproic acid on menstrual blood loss in women using intrauterine devices. British Medical Journal, 1975, 2, 21–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar 29.Macdonald, R.Modern treatment of menorrhagia. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1990, 97, 3–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed 30.Makarainen, L., & Ylikorkala, O.Primary and myoma-associated menorrhagia: Role of prostaglandins and effects of ibuprofen. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1986, 93, 974–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed 31.Milsom, I., Andersson, K., Andersch, B., & Rybo, G.A comparison of flurbiprofen, tranexamic acid, and a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive device in the treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1991, 164, 879–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar 32.Muggeridge, J., & Elder, M.Mefenamic acid in the treatment of menorrhagia. Research and Clinical Forums, 1983, 5, 83–88.Google Scholar 33.Nilsson, C.Comparative quantitation of menstrual blood loss with a d-norgestrel-releasing IUD and a Nova-T-copper device. Contraception, 1977, 15, 379–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar 34.Nilsson, L., & Rybo, G.Treatment of menorrhagia with an antifibrinolytic agent, tranexamic acid (AMCA): A double-blind investigation. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 1967, 46, 572–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar 35.Preston, J., Cameron, I., Adams, E., & Smith, S.Comparative study of tranexamic acid and norethisterone in the treatment of ovulatory menorrhagia. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1995, 102, 401–06.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed 36.Rees, M.Role of menstrual blood loss measurement in management of complaints of excessive menstrual bleeding. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1991, 98, 327–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed 37.Rees, M., Canate-Soler, R., Lopez-Bernal, A., & Turnbull, A.Effect of fenamates on prostaglandin E receptor binding. Lancet, 1988, ii, 541–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar 38.Roy, S., & Shaw, S.Role of prostaglandins in IUD-associated uterine bleeding: Effect of a prostaglandin synthetase (ibuprofen). Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1981, 58, 101–06.Google ScholarPubMed 39.Rybo, G.Tranexamic acid therapy effective treatment in heavy menstrual bleeding: Clinical update on safety. Therapeutic Advances, 1991, 4, 1–8.Google Scholar 40.Rybo, G., Nilsson, S., Sikstrom, B., & Nygren, K.Naproxen in menorrhagia (letter). Lancet, 1981, i, 608–09.CrossRefGoogle Scholar 41.Van Eijkeren, M., Christiaens, G., Gueze, H., & Sixma, J.Effects of mefenamic acid on menstrual hemostasis in essential menorrhagia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1992, 166, 1419–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed 42.Vargyas, J., Campeau, J., & Mishell, D.Treatment of menorrhagia with meclofenamate sodium. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1987, 157, 944–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed 43.Vermylen, J., Verhaegen-Declercq, M., Verstraete, M., & Fierens, F.A double-blind study of the effect of tranexamic acid in essential menorrhagia. Thrombosis et Diathesis Haemorrhagica, 1968, 20, 583–87.Google ScholarPubMed 44.Vessey, M., Villard-Mackintosh, L., McPherson, K., Coulter, A., & Yeates, D.The epidemiology of hysterectomy: Findings in a large cohort study. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1992, 99, 402–07.CrossRefGoogle Scholar 45.Ylikorkala, O., & Pekonen, F.Naproxen reduced idiopathic but not fibroma-induced menorrhagia. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1986, 68, 10–12.Google ScholarPubMed 46.Ylikorkala, O., & Viinikka, L.Comparison between antifibrinolytic and antiprostaglandin treatment in the reduction of increased menstrual blood loss in women with intrauterine contraceptive devices. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 1983, 90, 78–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed - 77 - Cited by Cited by Crossref Citations Farquhar, Cynthia M. 1996. The need for systematic reviews in the treatment of menstrual disorders–another Cochrane collaborative review group is born. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Vol. 103, Issue. 6, p. 497. Farquhar, Cindy and Vandekerckhove, Patrick 1996. 3 The Cochrane Library. Baillière's Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 10, Issue. 4, p. 569. Coulter, Angela 1996. 12 Theory into practice: applying the evidence across the health service. Baillière's Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 10, Issue. 4, p. 715. Lilford, R J 1997. Hysterectomy: will it pay the bills in 2007?. BMJ, Vol. 314, Issue. 7075, p. 160. Chapple, Alison Ling, Margaret and May, Carl 1997. Menorrhagia: The need for equity in treatment in Britain. Reproductive Health Matters, Vol. 5, Issue. 9, p. 132. Lethaby, A Irvine, G Cameron, I and Lethaby, Anne 1998. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Irvine, G. A. Campbell‐Brown, M. B. Lumsden, M. A. Heikkilä, A. Walker, J. J. and Cameron, I. T. 1998. Randomised comparative trial of the intrauterine system and norethisterone levonor gestrel for treatment of idiopathic menorrhagia. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Vol. 105, Issue. 6, p. 592. Duckitt, Kirsten 1998. Endometrial Ablative Techniques in the Climacteric Woman. British Menopause Society Journal, Vol. 4, Issue. 3, p. 108. Sculpher, Mark 1998. A Cost-Utility Analysis of Abdominal Hysterectomy Versus Transcervical Endometrial Resection for the Surgical Treatment of Menorrhagia. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, Vol. 14, Issue. 2, p. 302. Duckitt, Kirsten and Shaw, Robert W. 1998. Is medical management of menorrhagia obsolete?. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Vol. 105, Issue. 6, p. 569. Lähteenmäki, Pekka Prentice, Andrew Haukkamaa, Maija Puolakka, Jukka Riikonen, Ulla Sainio, Susanna Suvisaari, Janne and Nilsson, Carl Gustaf 1998. Open randomised study of use of levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system as alternative to hysterectomyCommentary: Promising results but wider recruitment needed. BMJ, Vol. 316, Issue. 7138, p. 1122. Lethaby, Anne Shepperd, Sasha Farquhar, Cindy Cooke, Inez and Lethaby, Anne 1999. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Winsor, S.H.M. Fisher, S. Hahn, P.M. and Reid, R.L. 1999. Retrospective Evaluation of the Long-Term Outcomes Following Conservative Management of Menorrhagia in Ovulatory Women. Journal SOGC, Vol. 21, Issue. 2, p. 155. Lethaby, AE Cooke, I and Rees, M 1999. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. HARLOW, SIOBÁN D. 2000. Women and Health. p. 99. Grant, Clare Gallier, Lesley Fahey, Tom Pearson, Nicky and Sarangi, Joyshri 2000. Management of menorrhagia in primary care—impact on referral and hysterectomy: data from the Somerset Morbidity Project. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, Vol. 54, Issue. 9, p. 709. Sculpher, Mark Thompson, Elizabeth Brown, Jim and Garry, Ray 2000. A cost effectiveness analysis of goserelin compared with danazol as endometrial thinning agents. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Vol. 107, Issue. 3, p. 340. Lethaby, Anne Farquhar, Cindy and Cooke, Inez 2000. Antifibrinolytics for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Lee, Joseph Y. Hahn, Philip M. Van Dijk, Janice P. and Reid, Robert L. 2000. Treatment of Menorrhagia with Tranexamic Acid. Journal SOGC, Vol. 22, Issue. 10, p. 794. O’Flynn, Norma and Britten, Nicky 2000. Menorrhagia in general practice — disease or illness. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 50, Issue. 5, p. 651.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (45)

Cited by (22)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK