Influence of Dienogest on Ovulation in Young Fertile Women

In: Clinical Drug Investigation · 1999 · vol. 18(4) , pp. 271–278 · doi:10.2165/00044011-199918040-00003 · W2005140218
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 33 in-corpus citations
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This study found that dienogest doses of 1.0mg or higher reliably inhibited ovulation in women, with dienogest 1.0mg being the minimal effective dose, and was well-tolerated.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-15 · read from full text ⓘ

This phase II randomized, open-label study evaluated the minimal oral daily dose of dienogest needed to reliably inhibit ovulation in 33 healthy young women with normal ovulatory cycles, using one control cycle followed by one treatment cycle and serial hormone measurements (progesterone, oestradiol, LH, FSH). Dienogest 0.5 mg inhibited ovulation in two-thirds of participants, while doses of 1.0–2.0 mg inhibited ovulation in all participants who completed the study; dose-dependent increases in cycle duration and decreases in menstrual flow duration were observed. Dienogest was reported as well tolerated with no serious adverse events and a lower frequency of dysmenorrhoea during the treatment cycle than during the control cycle. A key limitation noted by the authors is that nine enrolled volunteers did not start treatment, reducing the analyzed cohort. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper is included in the endometriosis/adenomyosis corpus because dienogest is a progestin compound commonly studied for endometriosis-related symptom control and regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis, though this study’s main focus is ovulation inhibition in healthy women rather than direct endometriosis/adenomyosis outcomes.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 6,500 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective: To determine the minimal oral dose of dienogest that will reliably and safely inhibit ovulation in healthy women with normal menstrual cycles. Design and Setting: Randomised, open, four-arm, phase II study involving one control cycle followed by one treatment cycle. Over 21 days patients received one of four oral doses of dienogest 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 or 2.0mg daily. Blood sampling for several hormones was performed on 13 days of each cycle. Participants: Forty-two healthy women were enrolled in the study. Because of an anovulatory control cycle and other reasons, nine of these volunteers did not start the treatment. 33 participants (mean age 24 ± 2 years) completed the study according to the protocol. Main Outcome Measures: Inhibition of ovulation was assessed by serum levels of progesterone, oestradiol, luteinising hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone. Safety and tolerability was measured by pre- and post-study medical examinations, cycle control, laboratory (blood and urine) tests, and incidence and severity of adverse events.

Results

Dienogest 0.5mg inhibited ovulation in two-thirds of the participants. Doses of dienogest ranging from 1.0 to 2.0mg inhibited ovulation in all patients who completed the study. No serious adverse events were observed at any dose. The frequency of dysmenorrhoea was lower during the treatment cycle than during the control cycle. Increases in cycle duration and reductions in the duration of menstrual flow and serum dienogest levels were dose dependent.

Conclusions

Dienogest 1.0mg is the minimal daily dose needed to inhibit ovulation in healthy individuals with normal ovulatory cycles. Dienogest was well tolerated at doses of up to 2.0mg and showed good control of withdrawal bleeding and dysmenorrhoea. Dienogest is suitable for use as the progestin compound in oral contraceptives. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Pauerstein CJ, Eddy CA, Croxatto HD, et al. Temporal relationships of estrogen, progesterone, and luteinizing hormone levels to ovulation in women and infrahuman primates. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1978; 130: 876–86 Spona J, Schneider WHF, Bieglmayer C, et al. Ovulation inhibition with different doses of levonorgestrel and other progestogens: clinical and experimental investigations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl 1979; 88: 8–15 Lippert TH, Mück AO. Der klinische Steinwert von Dienogest. In: Teichman AT, editor. Dienogest-präklinik und klinik eines neues gestagens. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1995: 261–74 Everett JW. Ovulation inhibition by progestins. In: Young WC, editor. Sex and internal secretions. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, 1961: 497 Pincus G. The control of fertility. New York: Academic Press, 1965 Schürenkämper P, Lisse K. Effects of the new prostestagen STS 557 on the biosynthesis of steroids in tissue slices of the human ovary. Exp Clin Endocrinol 1985; 86: 185–9 Oettel M, Bervoas-Martin S, Elger W, et al. A 19-nor-progestogen without a 17β-ethinyl group I: dienogest from a pharmacokinetic point of view. Drugs Today 1995; 31: 499–516 Oettel M, Carol W, Elger W, et al. A 19-norprogestogen without 17β-ethinyl group II: dienogest from a pharmacodynamic point of view. Drugs Today 1995; 31: 517–36 Ponsold K, Teichmüller G. Konzeption und Chemie der 17β-CH2X-Gonadiene. In: Teichman AT, editor. Dienogest-präklinik und klinik eines neues gestagens. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1995: 3–10 Juchem M, Schaffrath M, Pollow K, et al. Dienogest: bindungsstudien an verschiedenen rezeptor- und serum-proteinen. In: Teichman AT, editor. Dienogest-präklinik und klinik eines neues gestagens. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1995: 119–34 Oettel M, Elger W, Ernst M, et al. Experimentelle endo-krinpharmakologie von dienogest. In: Teichman AT, editor. Dienogest-präklinik und klinik eines neues gestagens. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1995: 11–22 Schleussner E, Michels W, Bethge S, et al. Die Wirkung von Dienogest auf die hypothalamisch-hypophysäre Achse: Ergebnisse einer Pilotstudie. In: Teichman AT, editor. Dienogest-präklinik und klinik eines neues gestagens. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1995: 171–9 Böcker R, Kleingeist B. Der einfluss von dienogest auf das humane cytochrom P-450-enzymsystem in vitro. In: Teichman AT, editor. Dienogest-präklinik und klinik eines neues gestagens. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1995: 141–8 Hoffman H, Zimmermann H, Hillesheim H, et al. Pharma-kologisch-toxicologisches wirkprofil von dienogest. In: Teichman AT, editor. Dienogest-präklinik und klinik eines neues gestagens. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1995: 59–72 Moore C, Klinger G, Walter F, et al. Pilot-studie an gesunden probandinnen über 6 Zyklen zum einfluss von MP 2000 auf kontrazeptive Sicherheit, Zyklusstabilität and Verträglichkeit. In: Teichman AT, editor. Dienogest-präklinik und klinik eines neues gestagens. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1995: 181–90 Wilks JW, Spilman CH, Campbell JA. Arrest of folliculogenesis and inhibition of ovulation in the monkey following weekly administration of progestogens. Fertil Steril 1983; 40: 688–92 Hobe G, Klinger G, Reddersen G, et al. Radioimmunologische bestimmung des prostagens dienogest im plasma und Speichel. Pharmazie 1986; 41: 772–4 Dericks-Tan JSE, Gudacker V, Taubert HD. Influence of oral contraceptives on integrated secretion of gonadoptropins. Contraception 1992; 46: 369–77 Köhler G, Wodrig W. Endokrinologische befunde und die reaktivität der hypophyse gegenüber GnRh unter gestagen-monotherapie der endometriose mit dienogest. In: Teichman AT, editor. Dienogest-präklinik und klinik eines neues gestagens. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1995: 253–61 Moore C, Walter F, Klinger G, et al. Der einfluss von dienogest auf die ovulation junger Frauen und auf weitere ausgewCählte endokronologische Parameter. In: Teichman AT, editor. Dienogest-präklinik und klinik eines neues gestagens. New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1995: 161–70 Zahradnik HP, Moore C. Clinical experiences with an oral contraceptive containing ethinyloestradiol and dienogest. In: Elstein M, editor. Extragenital effects of oral contraceptives. New York: Parthenon, 1997; 53–61 Author information Authors and Affiliations Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Moore, C., Carol, W., Gräser, T. et al. Influence of Dienogest on Ovulation in Young Fertile Women. Clin. Drug Investig. 18, 271–278 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-199918040-00003 Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/00044011-199918040-00003

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (12)

Cited by (33)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T03:26:54.866644+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-30T06:35:30.012611+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK