Chronic pelvic pain in New Zealand: prevalence, pain severity, diagnoses and use of the health services

Victoria M. Grace, Krina T. Zondervan
In: Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health · 2004 · vol. 28(4) , pp. 369–375 · doi:10.1111/j.1467-842x.2004.tb00446.x · PMID:15704703 · W2014669140
article OA: green CC0 ⤵ 99 in-corpus citations
🔓 Open OA copy Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

A 2001 New Zealand study found a 25.4% three-month prevalence of chronic pelvic pain, with nearly half of those undiagnosed, and higher health service use among women with severe pain.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text ⓘ

This population-based study in New Zealand used a random sample of 2,261 women aged 18–50 from the electoral roll and a postal questionnaire in 2001 to estimate the prevalence of chronic pelvic pain (defined as pain not linked to menstrual cycle or sexual activity), alongside dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia, and to assess pain severity, diagnoses, and health-service use. Among 1,160 respondents (66% response after adjustment), the three-month CPP prevalence was 25.4%, with 47.7% of women reporting CPP remaining undiagnosed, while dysmenorrhoea prevalence was 55.2% and dyspareunia 19.7%. Women who had consulted health services for CPP had a higher proportion of women with a high pain burden than those who had not consulted. The paper does not explicitly state other limitations in the provided text, and it relates CPP to unmet diagnostic and healthcare needs, including prevalence figures and service-use patterns. Relevance to endometriosis: the study examines chronic pelvic pain diagnoses and prevalence in reproductive-age women, a condition category in which endometriosis is commonly considered, though the paper’s abstract does not specifically mention endometriosis or adenomyosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 1,782 characters · extracted from oa-html · click to expand
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (Aug 2004) Chronic pelvic pain in New Zealand: prevalence, pain severity, diagnoses and use of the health services Abstract Abstract Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in women is often debilitating and isolating. Problems with diagnosis continue to make CPP one of the most perplexing conditions in gynaecology, and one of the most difficult to treat. Objectives:This paper reports the findings of a population‐based study in New Zealand in 2001 designed to investigate the prevalence of chronic pelvic pain in women between the ages of 18 and 50. Chronic pelvic pain was defined as pain that is neither associated with the menstrual cycle nor sexual activity. The prevalence of dysmenorrhoea and dyspareunia was also sought. It further aimed to examine pain severity, diagnoses, and the use of the health services as these facets of CPP affect different groups of women within New Zealand. Methods:A random sample of 2,261 was generated from the New Zealand Electoral Roll, and a postal questionnaire was administered during 2001. The response rate was 66% (adjusted for non‐receivers), giving a study group of 1,160 respondents. Results: The three‐month CPP prevalence rate was 25.4% (95% CI 22.8–27.9). Half of those women reporting CPP (47.7%) remained undiagnosed. The three‐month prevalence of dysmenorrhoea was 55.2%, and dyspareunia 19.7%. Recent or past consulters of health services for CPP contained a higher proportion of women with a high pain burden than those not consulting health services. Only one‐third of New Zealand women (34%) reported no form of chronic pelvic pain (i.e. no CPP, dysmenorrhoea or dyspareunia). These prevalence rates indicate that CPP should receive greater public education and clinical attention.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (20)

Cited by (50)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK