Padronização do laudo do exame ultrassonográfico para mulheres com dor pélvica crônica

In: Universidade de São Paulo · 2022 · doi:10.11606/d.17.2022.tde-09052022-095717 · W4280558117
dissertation OA: gold CC0
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

This paper proposes a standardized ultrasound report model for women with chronic pelvic pain, designed for practical clinical application.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

This dissertation studied chronic pelvic pain in women and aimed to propose a standardized ultrasound reporting model applicable in clinical practice. Using an international Delphi survey, the author assembled a panel of 86 invited specialists (21 completing three rounds) to evaluate key sonographic parameters, defining consensus as at least 70% agreement or, for discordant items, simple majority over successive rounds. The final consensus-based template includes assessment of examination quality, specified pelvic areas to evaluate, required elements in the report, and recommended probes/modes. The paper explicitly notes that the proposed tool requires future validation through controlled studies, and it does not specifically focus on endometriosis or adenomyosis; however, it was included in the corpus via keyword match related to pelvic pain and ultrasound reporting.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Objective: to propose a standardized model for the ultrasound examination report in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) that can be applied in clinical practice.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (100)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK