Pitfalls of the medical paradigm in chronic pelvic pain

Victoria M. Grace
In: Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology · 2000 · vol. 14(3) , pp. 525–539 · doi:10.1053/beog.1999.0089 · PMID:10962640 · W2055700848
review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 14 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This paper reviews potential limitations and challenges within the current medical approach to managing chronic pelvic pain.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

This article reviews specific clinical and philosophical problems in the medical and psychiatric literature on chronic pelvic pain since 1993. The problem of the dichotomy of 'organic' and 'psychogenic' pain has been well established in previous literature. The aim here is to consider recent developments purporting to respond to the impasse presented by this dichotomy. An evaluation of emergent trends towards multi-disciplinarity, and the 'biopsychosocial model' is developed. The resulting pitfalls discussed include the failure to develop understandings of the 'subjective' aspects of pain, the tendency to reduce causal processes to 'mechanisms', and the tendency to consider the psychosocial as purely reactive to the biological, inevitably positioned as prior. It is argued that these trends are only partial solutions to the problems and do not fully address the issues at stake. A greater diversity of theoretical and empirical perspectives needs to be introduced into medical research on chronic pelvic pain.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (68)

Cited by (14)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK