Sociopsychological factors in chronic pelvic pain: A review

Richard Fry, A. H. Crisp, R. W. Beard
In: Journal of Psychosomatic Research · 1997 · vol. 42(1) , pp. 1–15 · doi:10.1016/s0022-3999(96)00233-4 · PMID:9055210 · W2019373958
review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 26 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This review examines sociopsychological factors associated with chronic pelvic pain, exploring their prevalence, impact, and potential therapeutic implications.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Chronic pelvic pain is a common gynecological problem. There has long been an assumption that social and psychological factors play a part in its genesis in a significant subgroup, but their precise role remains unclear. More recently, childhood sexual abuse has been implicated as a specific risk factor. For this review, PSYCHLIT and MEDLINE searches for relevant publications were supplemented by tracing back through the latter's related reference lists. One hundred thirty-one references directly concerning pelvic pain were identified with varying emphasis on social and psychological aspects. A further 449 references were in related fields. Forty-three were considered to be helpful in directly exploring the link between chronic pelvic pain and sociopsychological factors and 22 of these reported specific studies directly relevant. In common with other research into chronic pain conditions, it appears unhelpful to separate this type of pain into "psychogenic" and "organic" categories. Clear case definition is essential. The specificity of childhood sexual abuse as a risk factor is unclear. It may be helpful to consider clearly defined subgroups with the condition in future studies. An example of such a subgroup with pelvic venous congestion is discussed.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (55)

Cited by (21)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-08-29T06:28:44.313744+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK