Should laparoscopy be a mandatory component of the infertility evaluation in infertile women with normal hysterosalpingogram or suspected unilateral distal tubal pathology?

Yuval Lavy, Lavy Y, Ahinoam Lev-Sagie, Ahinoam Lev‐Sagie, Hananel Holtzer, Holtzer H, Ariel Revel, Hurwitz A, Arye Hurwitz
European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · 2004 · vol. 114(1) , pp. 64–68 · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.09.035 · PMID:15099873 · W2011153882
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 36 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This paper evaluates whether laparoscopy is a necessary part of infertility assessments for women with normal hysterosalpingograms or suspected unilateral distal tubal issues.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the diagnostic benefit of laparoscopy in infertile women with normal hysterosalpingography (HSG) or suspected unilateral pathology on HSG.Study designCharts of infertile women that underwent complete infertility evaluation between 1996 and 1998 were retrospectively reviewed. Eighty-six patients in whom both HSG and laparoscopy were performed were included in the study. HSG results were compared with laparoscopic findings and the suggested treatment based on HSG results was compared with the treatment plan based on laparoscopic findings.ResultsAmong 63 patients with a normal HSG or suspected unilateral tubal pathology, who were assigned to ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination (IUI), 60 patients were found to have laparoscopic findings that did not necessitate any change in the original treatment plan. In three patients (4.8%), abnormalities discovered at laparoscopy were of such an extent that a change in the original treatment regimen and referral to in vitro fertilization (IVF) was needed. Among 23 patients with suspected bilateral tubal occlusion on HSG, 16 patients (69.6%) were found to have an abnormal laparoscopy with bilateral tubal adhesions, 6 patients (26%) had unilateral tubal adhesions, and 1 patient (4.3%) had pelvic adhesions with no obstruction. These latter findings led to changes in the original treatment plan of these seven patients from IVF to ovulation induction and IUI.ConclusionsLaparoscopy may be omitted in women with normal HSG or suspected unilateral distal tubal pathology on HSG, since it was not shown to change the original treatment plan indicated by HSG in 95% of the patients. However, laparoscopy should be recommended in cases with suspected bilateral tubal occlusion on HSG, since it altered the original treatment plan in 30% of the patients from IVF to induction of ovulation with IUI. The reassuring results found in the present study may be related to the low prevalence of pelvic inflammatory diseases and endometriosis in our population.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

infertility

MeSH descriptors

Fallopian Tube Diseases Infertility, Female Laparoscopy Adult Diagnostic Tests, Routine Fallopian Tube Diseases Fallopian Tube Diseases Fallopian Tube Diseases Fallopian Tube Diseases Female Humans Hysterosalpingography Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Israel Israel Laparoscopy Medical Records

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (21)

Cited by (36)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-10T06:11:17.106188+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T06:12:37.668444+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:12:38.158000+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK