Product review

article OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 27 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13

I cannot summarize this paper as no abstract or content was provided.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveTo determine whether the accuracy of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy is comparable to that of standard laparoscopy for the diagnosis of infertility.DesignProspective, comparative study.SettingGeneral hospital in Belgium.Patient(s)Ten infertile patients without obvious pelvic pathology.Intervention(s)Two gynecologists independently performed transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy and standard laparoscopy and reported the observations in a confidential manner to a third person.Main outcome measure(s)Endometriosis, adhesions, and other pelvic pathology related to infertility.Result(s)Minimal or mild endometriosis was diagnosed in seven patients and sequelae of pelvic inflammatory disease in one patient at both procedures. The interobserver agreement for tuboovarian adhesions was 95% at transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy and 74% at standard laparoscopy. Ovarian adhesions were detected in 63% at transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy and in 37% at standard laparoscopy.Conclusion(s)Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy is comparable in accuracy to standard laparoscopy for the diagnosis of adhesions and endometriosis in infertile patients without obvious pathology.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Infertility, Female Laparoscopy Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Fallopian Tube Diseases Fallopian Tube Diseases Female Humans Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Laparoscopy Ovarian Diseases Ovarian Diseases Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Sensitivity and Specificity Tissue Adhesions Tissue Adhesions

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (10)

Cited by (27)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-01T06:07:04.264727+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:10:29.640636+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK