In-office transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy: a step-by-step, intraoperative pain evaluation

Purpose Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy (THL) is a mini-invasive technique, which allows exploration of the posterior pelvis. THL can be carried out as an office procedure and may replace hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy for the diagnosis of infertility. The aim of this study was to assess pain level during each step of THL.

Forty infertile women underwent office THL with local anesthesia and had to score pain on a Likert scale (0—no pain, 5—maximum pain) during five stages of THL: stage 1, introduction of the intrauterine catheter; stage 2, introduction of the Veress needle in the Douglas pouch; stage 3, introduction of the trocar in the pelvis; stage 4, exploration of pelvic organs; stage 5, chromosalpingoscopy. At the end of the study, patients scored their overall satisfaction on a VAS scale (0—not satisfied at all; 10—completely satisfied).

Stage 5 was associated with the highest pain score in comparison with stages 1–4 (p < 0.001), while pain score during stage 4 was significantly higher in comparison with stages 1–3 (p = 0.001).

Office THL seems to be well tolerated by patients. Chromosalpingoscopy was the least tolerated stage but it does not adversely impact on the procedure, which can be adequately accomplished by performing proper counseling. Similar content being viewed by others

Decker A (1944) Culdoscopy: a new method in diagnosis of pelvic disease. Am J Surg 64:40–44 Kelly JV, Rock J (1956) Culdoscopy for diagnosis in infertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 76:523–537 Gordts SJ, Campo R, Rombauts L, Bronsens I (1998) Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy as an outpatient procedure for infertility investigation. Human Reprod. 13:99–103 Watrelot A, Dreyfus JM, Andeline JP (1999) Evaluation of the performance of fertiloscopy in 160 consecutive infertile patients with no obvious pathology. Hum Reprod 14:707–711 Darai E, Dessole L, Lecuru F, Brosens I (2000) Transvaginal hydrolaparoscoy compared with laparoscopy for the evaluation of infertile women:a prospective comparative blind study. Hum Reprod 15:2379–2382 Casa A, Sesti F, Marziali M, Piccione E (2002) Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy vs.conventional laparoscopy for evaluating unexplained primary infertility in women. J Reprod Med 47:617–620 Cicinelli E, Matteo M, Causio F, Schonauer LM, Pinto V, Galantino P (2001) Tolerability of the mini-pain-endoscopic approach (transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy and minihysteroscopy) versus hysterosalpingography in outpatient infertility investigation. Fertil Steril 76:1048–1051 Fujiwara H, Shibahara H, Hirano Y, Suzuki T, Takamizawa S, Sato I (2003) Usufulness and prognostic value of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy in infertile women. Fertil Steril 79:186–189 La Sala GB, Montanari R, Dessanti L, Cigarini C, Sartori F (1998) The role of diagnostic hysteroscopy and endometrial biopsy in assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril 70:378–380 De Wilde RL, Brosens I (2012) Rationale of first-line endoscopy-based fertility exploration using transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy and minihysteroscopy. Hum Reprod 27:2247–2253 Watrelot A, Nisolle M, Chelli H, Rongieres C, Racinet C (2003) Is laparoscopy still the gold standard in infertility assessment? A comparasion of fertiloscopy versus laparoscopy in infertility. International Group for Fertiloscopy Evaluation. Hum Reprod 18:834–839 Campo R, Gordts S, Rombauts L, Brosens I (1999) Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy in infertility. Fertil Steril 71:1157–1160 Brosens I, Gordts S, Campo R (2001) THL is superior to standard laparoscopy for detection of subtle endometriotic adhesions of the ovary. Fertil Steril 75:1009–1012 More ML, Cohen M, Liu GY (2003) Experience with 109 cases of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparos 10:282–285 Van Tetering EA, Bongers MY, Wiegerinck MA, Mol BW, Koks CA (2007) Prognostic capacity of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy to predict spontaneous pregnancy. Hum Reprod 22:1091–1094 Gordts S, Campo R, Puttemans P, Gordts Sy, Brosens I (2008) Transvaginal access a safe technique for tubo-ovarian exploration in infertility? A review of the literature. Gynecol Surg 5:187–191 Chauhan MB, Lakra P, Jyotsana D, Nanda S, Mallhota V (2013) Pain relief during hysterosalpingography: role of intracervical block. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287:155–159 Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Ethical standard The Study have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Informed consent All persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Giampaolino, P., Pellicano, M., Tommaselli, G.A. et al. In-office transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy: a step-by-step, intraoperative pain evaluation. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292, 1373–1377 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3750-x Received: Accepted: Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3750-x