Laparoscopy in women with unexplained infertility: a cost-effectiveness analysis

S.E. Moayeri, Sharon E Moayeri, Moayeri SE, Henry Lee, Henry C Lee, Ruth B. Lathi, Lynn M. Westphal, Westphal LM, Milki AA, Amin A. Milki, Alan M. Garber, Garber AM
Fertility and sterility · 2008 · vol. 92(2) , pp. 471–480 · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.05.074 · PMID:18722609 · W2046500749
article OA: bronze CC0 ⤵ 18 in-corpus citations
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

This cost-effectiveness analysis examined the use of laparoscopy in women with unexplained infertility to determine its value compared to other diagnostic and treatment options.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the cost effectiveness of laparoscopy for unexplained infertility.DesignWe performed a cost-effectiveness analysis using a computer-generated decision analysis tree. Data used to construct the mathematical model were extracted from the literature or obtained from our practice. We compared outcomes following four treatment strategies: [1] no treatment, [2] standard infertility treatment algorithm (SITA), [3] laparoscopy with expectant management (LSC/EM), and [4] laparoscopy with infertility therapy (LSC/IT). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated, and one-way sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of varying base-case estimates.SettingAcademic in vitro fertilization practice.Patient(s)Computer-simulated patients assigned to one of four treatments.Intervention(s)Fertility treatment or laparoscopy.Main outcome measure(s)Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.Result(s)Using base-case assumptions, LSC/EM was preferred (ICER =$128,400 per live-birth in U.S. dollars). Changing the following did not alter results: rates and costs of multiple gestations, penalty for high-order multiples, infertility treatment costs, and endometriosis prevalence. Outcomes were most affected by patient dropout from infertility treatments-SITA was preferred when dropout was less than 9% per cycle. Less important factors included surgical costs, acceptability of twins, and the effects of untreated endometriosis on fecundity.Conclusion(s)Laparoscopy is cost effective in the initial management of young women with infertility, particularly when infertility treatment dropout rates exceed 9% per cycle.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Health Care Costs Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Laparoscopy Pregnancy Outcome Pregnancy Outcome Comorbidity Cost-Benefit Analysis Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Health Care Costs Humans Incidence Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Laparoscopy Laparoscopy

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (75)

Cited by (18)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-01T06:07:04.264727+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:14:24.299271+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK