A prospective study to evaluate the role of laparohysteroscopy in unexplained infertility

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10

This study found that laparoscopy detected pelvic abnormalities in 36.7% of women with unexplained infertility and was therapeutic in 30% of cases, suggesting its benefit after failed empirical treatment.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Laparoscopy is considered as the preferred modality for the diagnosis of pelvic pathology but its timing and use in the investigation of infertility is an area of debate. A prospective observational study was conducted between 1 November, 2009 and 31 March, 2011, in which 30 women with unexplained infertility with at least three failed cycles of COH and IUI were included and subjected to laparohysteroscopy. On laparoscopy, pelvic abnormalities were found in 11 (36.7%) women. On hysteroscopy, intrauterine lesions were detected in two (6.7%) of the women. The commonest pelvic pathology detected was adhesions followed by minimal to mild endometriosis. Operative procedures were done in nine (30%) cases. Since laparoscopy was not only diagnostic but also therapeutic in a significant number of cases, it was concluded that laparoscopy is beneficial following failure of empirical treatment in women with unexplained infertility while the routine use of hysteroscopy requires further assessment.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

MeSH descriptors

Hysteroscopy Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Laparoscopy Pelvis Adult Comparative Effectiveness Research Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Hysteroscopy India Laparoscopy Outcome Assessment, Health Care Prospective Studies

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (19)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-12T06:07:16.479679+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:18:15.805398+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK