Evaluation of cases of infertility by diagnostic laparoscopy

In: International Journal of Reproduction, Contraception, Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2017 · vol. 6(3) , pp. 924 · doi:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20170557 · W2587816576
article OA: diamond CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-11

This study evaluated 115 infertile women via diagnostic laparoscopy, finding pelvic abnormalities in 86.95%, with tubal blockage, polycystic ovaries, and adhesions being the most common pathologies.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-11 · read from full text

This descriptive study evaluated 115 women with primary or secondary infertility at an outpatient infertility clinic in Obstetrics and Gynaecology (February 2012 to November 2013) using clinical history and investigations, with diagnostic laparoscopy findings documented. Normal laparoscopic findings were seen in 15.38% of primary infertility and 4.17% of secondary infertility, while pelvic abnormalities were found in 86.95% overall. The most common pathologies were tubal block (31.30%), polycystic ovaries (27.83%), and adhesions (20.87%), with uterine anomalies reported in 3.30%. The authors state as a limitation that laparoscopy is invasive yet conclude it is valuable/mandatory in the primary workup, though no explicit caveats about generalizability or study design are provided in the abstract. Relevance to endometriosis: endometriosis is listed among leading causes of female infertility in the paper’s background, though the reported laparoscopic results presented do not specifically quantify endometriosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Infertility affects nearly 10-15% of couples and is an important part of clinical practice. Leading causes of infertility include tubal disease, ovulatory disorders, uterine or cervical factors, endometriosis and male factor infertility. The objective of the study was to find out different causes of female infertility with diagnostic laparoscopy.Methods: This was a descriptive study conducted from February 2012 to November 2013. 115 patients with infertility attending the infertility clinic in OPD of Obstetrics and Gynaecology were evaluated clinically with detailed history. The necessary investigations were carried out and the laparoscopic findings were documented.Results: There were 91 cases (79.13%) with primary infertility and 24 (20.87%) with secondary infertility. Laparoscopy revealed normal findings in 14 cases (15.38%) of primary infertility and 1 case (4.17%) of secondary infertility. Pelvic abnormality was found in 100 cases (86.95%). Tubal block was the most common pathology found in 36 cases (31.30%) followed by polycystic ovaries in 32 (27.83%) and adhesions in 24 (20.87%). Uterine anomalies were found in 3 cases (3.30%).Conclusions: Diagnostic laparoscopy is a valuable technique and a mandatory investigation, which, though invasive, is more convenient and more precise for the diagnosis of infertility. Because of its potential diagnostic as well as therapeutic benefits, all patients with infertility should undergo diagnostic laparoscopy as part of their primary workup of infertility.
Full text 6,395 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Background

Infertility affects nearly 10-15% of couples and is an important part of clinical practice. Leading causes of infertility include tubal disease, ovulatory disorders, uterine or cervical factors, endometriosis and male factor infertility. The objective of the study was to find out different causes of female infertility with diagnostic laparoscopy.

Methods

This was a descriptive study conducted from February 2012 to November 2013. 115 patients with infertility attending the infertility clinic in OPD of Obstetrics and Gynaecology were evaluated clinically with detailed history. The necessary investigations were carried out and the laparoscopic findings were documented.

Results

There were 91 cases (79.13%) with primary infertility and 24 (20.87%) with secondary infertility. Laparoscopy revealed normal findings in 14 cases (15.38%) of primary infertility and 1 case (4.17%) of secondary infertility. Pelvic abnormality was found in 100 cases (86.95%). Tubal block was the most common pathology found in 36 cases (31.30%) followed by polycystic ovaries in 32 (27.83%) and adhesions in 24 (20.87%). Uterine anomalies were found in 3 cases (3.30%).

Conclusions

Diagnostic laparoscopy is a valuable technique and a mandatory investigation, which, though invasive, is more convenient and more precise for the diagnosis of infertility. Because of its potential diagnostic as well as therapeutic benefits, all patients with infertility should undergo diagnostic laparoscopy as part of their primary workup of infertility.Metrics

References

Mosher WD, Pratt WF. Fecundity and infertility in the United States: incidence and trends. Fertil Steril.1991;56(2):192-3. Padubidri VG, Shirish DN. The Pathology of conception. In: Shaw’s Text book of Gynaecology. 12th ed. New Delhi: BI Churchill Livingstone; 1983:154-68. LuEsley D, Baker P. Female infertility. In: Obstetrics and Gynecology- An evidence based text for MRCOG. 1st ed. India; 2004:566-573. Maroulis G. Effect of aging on fertility and pregnancy. Seminars Reprodn Endocrinol. 1991;9:165. Kanal P, Sharma S. Study of primary infertility in females by diagnostic laproscopy. Internet J Med Update. 2006;1(2):7-9. Boricha Y, Sharma R, Boricha B, Sabrina M, Archana C, Narshetty J. Laparoscopy in 50 infertile couples: prospective study. Int J Med Clin Res. 2011;2(2):63-6. Mehreen B, Batool WS, Khawaja Tahir KM. Diagnostic significance of laparoscopy in infertility and identification of various unsuspected factors associated with infertility in females. J Pharm Sci. Res. 2010;2(8):499-505. Dechanet C, Belaisch-Allart J, Hédon B. Prognosis criteria for the management of the infertile couple, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod. 2010;39(8 Suppl 2):S9-26. Wilkes S, Chinn DJ, Murdoch A, Rubin G. Epidemiology and management of infertility: a population-based study in UK primary care. Fam Pract. 2009;26(4):269-74. Imani B, Eijkemans M, Velde E, Habbema J, Fauser B. Predictors of patients remaining anovulatory during clomiphene citrate induction of ovulation in normogonadotropicoligoamenorrheic infertility. J Clin Endocrinol Metab.1998;83:2361. Wass P, Waldenstrom U, Rossner S, Hellberg D. An andoid body fat distribution in females impairs the pregnancy rate of in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(9):2057-60. Pasquali R, Gambineri A, Pagotto U. The impact of obesity on reproduction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Int J Obst Gynecol. 2006;113:1148-59. Goldin A, Baker W. Tuberculosis of the female genital tract. J Ky Med Assoc. 1985;83:75-6. Singh N, Gurunath S, Suneeta M. Genital tuberculosis a leading cause of infertility in women seeking assisted conception in North India. Archives Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278(4):325-7. Shaheen R, Subhan F, Tahir F. Epidemiology of genital tuberculosis in infertile population. J Pak Med Assoc. 2006;56(7):306-9. Sharma J, Roy K, Pushparaj M, Kumar S, Mittal S. Laparoscopic findings in female genital tuberculosis. Archives Gynecol Obstet. 2008;278(4):359-64. McVeigh E. Polycystic ovarian syndrome. In: Baker P, Leusley D eds. Obstetrics and Gynaecology: an evidencebased text for MRCOG. London: Oxford University Press; 2004:588-593. Raida M, Al-Wazzan, Entessar A. Diagnostic laparoscopy in female infertility. Ann Coll Med. 2009; 35(1):58-64. Hoffman L, Chan K, Smith B, Okolo S. The value of saline salpingosonography as a surrogate test of tubal patency in a low resource setting. Int J Fertil women Med. 2005;50:135-9. Otolorin EO, Ojengbede O, Falase AO. Laparoscopic evaluation of the tuboperitoneal factor in infertile Nigerian women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1987;25(1):47-52. Aflatoonian A, Hassani S, Tabibnejad N. The epidemiological and etiological aspects of infertility in Yazd province of Iran. Iranian J Reprod Med. 2009;7:117-2. Yedidya H, Eliezer H, Miriam A, Chaim Y. Diagnostic laparoscopy in primary and secondary infertility. J Assist Reprod Genetics. 1998;15(9):535-7. Farquhar C, Brown J, Marjoribanks J. Laparoscopic drilling by diathermy or laser for ovulation induction in anovulatory polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012 Jun;13(6):CD001122. Mourali M, Kawali A, Fitouhi L, Bakri P, Hmila F, Binous N, et al. Ovarian drilling in treatment of infertility with dystrophic ovaries. Medicale Tunisia. 2012;90(2):122-8. Abu H, Al-Inany H, De Vos M, Tournaye H. Laparoscopic ovarian drilling for treatment of PCOS. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013;288(2):409-22. Lee H, Lee J, Choi Y. Natural conception rate following laparoscopic surgery in infertile women with endometriosis. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2013; 40(1):29-32. Lavy Y, Lev-Sagie A, Holtzer H, Revel A, Hurwitz A. Should laparoscopy be a mandatory component of the infertility evaluation in infertile women with normal hysterosalpingogram or suspected unilateral distal tubal pathology? Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;114(1):64-8. Mol B, Collins J, Burrow E, Veen F, Bossuyt. Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertiliry outcome. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1237-42. Nordenskjold F, Ahlgren M. Laparoscopy in female infertility. Acta Obstetriciaet Gynecologica Scandinavica. 1983;62(6):609-15.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (21)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK