A comparative study of hysterosalpingography with laparoscopy in the diagnosis of tubal pathology
article
OA: bronze
CC0
AI-generated summary
This comparative study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of hysterosalpingography against laparoscopy for identifying tubal pathologies.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (3)
- Laparoscopic Surgery in Infertile Women with Minimal or Mild Endometriosis 1997
- Should laparoscopy be a mandatory component of the infertility evaluation in infertile women with normal hysterosalpingogram or suspected unilateral distal tubal pathology? 2004
- The role of laparoscopy in intrauterine insemination: a prospective randomized reallocation study 2005
References (10)
- Laparoscopic Surgery in Infertile Women with Minimal or Mild Endometriosis via openalex
- Should laparoscopy be a mandatory component of the infertility evaluation in infertile women with normal hysterosalpingogram or suspected unilateral distal tubal pathology? via openalex
- The role of laparoscopy in intrauterine insemination: a prospective randomized reallocation study via openalex
- W2047804225 via openalex
- W2101051083 via openalex
- W2302035116 via openalex
- W1771512100 via openalex
- W2417866724 via openalex
- W2034091843 via openalex
- W2042616994 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK