A feasibility study to evaluate pelvic peritoneal anatomy with a saline intraperitoneal sonogram (SIPS)
article
OA: bronze
CC0
⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
This feasibility study investigated the ability of saline intraperitoneal sonography (SIPS) to visualize the pelvic peritoneal anatomy.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
ObjectiveTo prove the safety and feasibility of evaluating pelvic anatomy with a new imaging technique called saline intraperitoneal sonogram (SIPS).DesignProspective clinical case series.SettingOutpatient fertility clinic.Patient(s)Ten women with unexplained infertility and normal hysterosalpingograms (HSG). Five women with no known risk factors and five women with known risk factors for adhesive disease were enrolled.Intervention(s)Step 1 required performing a sonohysterogram. Step 2 involved directing a 17-g oocyte retrieval needle into a pocket of peritoneal fluid under ultrasound guidance and infusing normal saline. The pelvic anatomy was evaluated with the three-dimensional and four-dimensional mode on pelvic ultrasound.Main outcome measure(s)Technical feasibility, safety, time, fluid infusion, and deficit volumes.Result(s)All 10 patients successfully completed the protocol. One of the five women with no risk factors for adhesive disease and a normal HSG was discovered to have a unilateral hydrosalpinx and filmy adhesive disease on SIPS. Both findings were confirmed on laparoscopy. Three out of the five women with known risk factors had abnormal SIPS imaging and were confirmed on laparoscopy to have significant adhesive disease. The average procedure time was 45 minutes (±15 minutes).Conclusion(s)This study demonstrates that SIPS is a safe, quick, and potentially cost-effective method for evaluating pelvic adhesive disease in an outpatient facility in women with unexplained infertility and a normal HSG.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (8)
- Efficacy of hysterosalpingography in evaluating endometriosis via openalex
- Hysterosalpingography, laparoscopy and hysteroscopy in infertility. A comparative study. via openalex
- Investigation of the infertile couple via openalex
- Is laparoscopy necessary before assisted reproductive technology? via openalex
- Should laparoscopy be a mandatory component of the infertility evaluation in infertile women with normal hysterosalpingogram or suspected unilateral distal tubal pathology? via openalex
- The position of diagnostic laparoscopy in current fertility practice via openalex
- The role of laparoscopy in intrauterine insemination: a prospective randomized reallocation study via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/deg034 via openalex
Cited by (2)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:03:29.626429+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK