Pearls and Pitfalls in Surgery for Endometrioma

review OA: gold CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

Surgical planning for endometriomas requires careful consideration of patient factors to preserve reproductive potential, with laparoscopy as the gold standard, though resection versus ablation warrants further investigation.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometrioma surgery should be planned and executed very carefully as it is associated with risks that may hamper future reproductive potential. Symptoms, age, risk of malignancy, bilaterality, ovarian reserve, and desire to have children should all be taken into account prior to surgical intervention. Cyclic and noncyclic severe pain may be an indicator or deep infiltrating diseases. Laparoscopic surgery is the gold standard, however, the issue of resection versus ablation should be further studied.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_painendometrioma

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Laparoscopy Pelvic Pain Catheter Ablation Catheter Ablation Drainage Drainage Electrocoagulation Electrocoagulation Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Humans Laparoscopy Ovarian Diseases Ovarian Diseases Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain Pelvic Pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (42)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-27T09:11:36.575535+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:17:39.907309+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK