Role of 3D Ultrasound and Doppler in Differentiating Clinically Suspected Cases of Leiomyoma and Adenomyosis of Uterus
3D ultrasound and Doppler parameters, including peripheral versus central vascularity and blood flow impedance indices, effectively differentiate uterine leiomyoma from adenomyosis with high sensitivity and specificity.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This study enrolled 100 reproductive-age patients with symptoms such as abnormal uterine bleeding (with or without dysmenorrhea), lump abdomen, chronic pelvic pain, or dyspareunia who were clinically suspected to have uterine leiomyoma and/or adenomyosis. Using transvaginal and transabdominal 3D ultrasound plus color and spectral Doppler in the follicular phase, the authors assessed lesion morphology, vascularity patterns, and Doppler-derived pulsatility index (PI), resistive index (RI), and Vmax, then correlated radiologic diagnoses with operative and histopathological findings. For leiomyoma, Doppler and morphological criteria yielded high diagnostic performance (reported sensitivity 93.4%, specificity 95.6%, PPV 97.6%, NPV 88.6%), while adenomyosis showed sensitivity 95.6% and specificity 93.4% (PPV 88.6%, NPV 97.6%); co-existence was correctly diagnosed in 8 of 66 cases. The authors note potential bias control by selecting the follicular phase, and inclusion was limited to patients chosen for operative treatment, which may restrict generalizability. Relevance to endometriosis: adenomyosis is closely related to endometriosis as a disorder of uterine endometrial tissue invasion, but this paper focuses on differentiating adenomyosis from leiomyoma using 3D ultrasound and Doppler in clinically suspected uterine cases.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
3,537 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· 4 sections
· click to expand
Introduction
Materials and methods
Results
Conclusion
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (14)
- Acute torsion of uterine leiomyoma: CT features via openalex
- Cyclic Pelvic Pain via openalex
- Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. via openalex
- The reproducibility of endometrial volume acquisition and measurement with the VOCAL‐imaging program via openalex
- Transvaginal Doppler examination of uteri with myomas via openalex
- Transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of adenomyosis: a review via openalex
- Tumor Vascular Pattern and Blood Flow Impedance in the Differential Diagnosis of Leiomyoma and Adenomyosis by Color Doppler Sonography via openalex
- W2009251657 via openalex
- W1969018878 via openalex
- W2051398973 via openalex
- W1252882847 via openalex
- W350539714 via openalex
- W2014463766 via openalex
- W2510998083 via openalex
Cited by (25)
- Perspectives in transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis 2025
- Validation of the revised MUSA criteria for sonographic detection of adenomyosis 2025
- Role of ultrasound with doppler in differentiating clinically suspected cases of leiomyoma and adenomyosis of uterus 2025
- Gynecological Ultrasound 2025
- Methods of diagnostics of adenomyosis: a systematic review 2023
- Current Non-Invasive Imaging Techniques Used in the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis 2023
- Adenomyosis: Transvaginal Ultrasound and Imaging Innovations for Diagnosis 2023
- Diagnostic Role of Transvaginal Sonography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Adenomyosis of the Uterus and its Correlation with Histopathology 2023
- A Delphi Consensus-Based Chronic Pelvic Pain Standardized Ultrasound Approach 2022
- Adenomyosis or Fibroid? Making the Right Diagnosis 2022
- Role of three-dimensional ultrasound and Doppler in differentiating leiomyoma and adenomyosis of uterus 2022
- Sonographic and clinical features of adenomyosis in women in "early" (18-35) and "advanced" (>35) reproductive ages 2021
- Uterine fibroid vascularization: from morphological evidence to clinical implications 2021
- A pictorial review of ultrasonography of the FIGO classification for uterine leiomyomas 2021
- Question Mark Sign and Transvaginal Ultrasound Uterine Tenderness for the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis 2020
- Adenomyose 2019
- Ultrasound of Pelvic Pain in the Nonpregnant Woman 2019
- Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasonographic and power Doppler features of adenomyosis : Are they related to symptoms? 2019
- CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES OF RADIOLOGIC DIAGNOSIS OF ADENOMYOSIS IN REPRODUCTIVE LOSSES 2019
- Use of Uterine Characteristics to Improve Fertility-Sparing Diagnosis of Adenomyosis 2018
- Uterine Artery Embolization 2018
- Transvaginal Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 2017
- Treatment options and reproductive outcome for adenomyosis-associated infertility 2017
- From Clinical Symptoms to MR Imaging: Diagnostic Steps in Adenomyosis 2017
- An update on adenomyosis uteri 2015
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-14T06:08:20.186862+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:17:52.213533+00:00