Adenomyosis or Fibroid? Making the Right Diagnosis

In: Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · 2022 · vol. 14(1) , pp. 14–16 · doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10006-2004 · W4226374777
article OA: bronze CC0
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07

Power Doppler ultrasound, when combined with B-mode imaging, effectively distinguishes adenomyosis from fibroids by differentiating their vascularity patterns and flow impedance.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Background: Differentiating adenomyomas from fibroids may be challenging at times when we use routine morphological criteria. Using Doppler in addition to routine B mode ultrasound can help in differentiating adenomyomas from fibroid uterus. Materials and methods: This is a prospective study done on patients diagnosed with fibroid or adenomyosis who were planned for hysterectomy. Routine ultrasound with Power Doppler was done for all patients and the blood flow impedance between the two was compared. Results: There was a significant difference between the blood flow in adenomyosis and fibroid. Fibroids had peripherally distributed vascularity with low impedance and adenomyosis had intralesional vascularity with high resistance flow. Conclusion: Use of Doppler in addition to morphological features on routine ultrasound helps to differentiate the uterine lesions like fibroid and adenomyosis.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (4)

References (6)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK