Validation of the revised MUSA criteria for sonographic detection of adenomyosis

Shekinah D Dosunmu, Albert Sarno, Eunice Lee, C. G. Mitchell, Cassandra Mitchell, Julia Wang, Kyle Shaak
Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025 · vol. 51(1) , pp. 274–282 · doi:10.1007/s00261-025-05039-y · PMID:40514461 · W4411262170
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of revised MUSA criteria for adenomyosis, finding moderate sensitivity and specificity with fair inter-rater agreement.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Outcome instruments

MUSA

Condition tags

adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adult Adult

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (23)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-23T00:31:21.040184+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK