Reliability of the visual diagnosis of ovarian endometriosis

Diagnostic accuracy OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 56 in-corpus citations
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-06 ⓘ

This paper assesses the reliability of visual diagnosis for ovarian endometriosis.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

The visual diagnosis of endometrioma at laparotomy in 245 women operated on for ovarian cysts demonstrated a sensitivity of 97%, specificity of 95%, positive and negative predictive value of 98% and 94%, respectively, and overall accuracy of 96%. Because the visual detection of endometriomas is remarkably accurate, ovarian biopsy, although desirable in some cases, would seem dispensable for a correct laparoscopic diagnosis and staging of the disease.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Ovarian Diseases Adult Adult Cysts Cysts Cysts Cysts Diagnosis, Differential Diagnosis, Differential Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Evaluation Studies as Topic Evaluation Studies as Topic Female Female Humans Humans Laparotomy

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (9)

Cited by (50)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-16T06:09:50.462052+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:04:17.981133+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-17T06:32:46.214484+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK