Head to toe: expand your diagnosis on routine imaging to include endometriosis

review OA: closed CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-08

This review describes imaging findings of endometriosis across various organ systems that mimic other pathologies to help radiologists broaden their differential diagnosis for earlier detection.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 · read from full text

This review examines endometriosis as a condition that can be diagnosed non-invasively but is often diagnosed 5–10 years late, focusing on how radiologists can use pattern recognition across routine imaging studies outside pelvis-focused protocols. It describes high-level imaging approaches and characteristic findings of endometriosis that can mimic other pathologies in multiple organ systems, including when clinicians order non-targeted CT, neurologic/musculoskeletal MRI, or ultrasound for unrelated indications. The key claim is that broad familiarity with endometriosis’s imaging masquerades can narrow diagnostic delays, though the article is limited as a narrative review and does not generate new datasets or analyses. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it reviews how radiologists can recognize endometriosis patterns on routine imaging across organ systems.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 16,973 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Endometriosis is a common condition primarily impacting women of childbearing age. Despite increasing awareness that endometriosis can be diagnosed non-invasively with the correct imaging techniques, there exists a significant delay in diagnosis, to the tune of 5–10 years. This gap can be narrowed by understanding that this is a disease that lends itself to pattern recognition, and learning to recognize the characteristic patterns on any imaging study will allow earlier diagnosis and prevent long-term complications that can occur with progressive, untreated endometriosis. The disease is often multifocal and thus can present with a wide array of nonspecific symptoms. When clinical findings do not suggest endometriosis, patients often undergo non-targeted imaging, such as chest, abdominal, or pelvic computed tomography (CT); Magnetic Resonance imaging (MRI) studies optimized for neurologic or musculoskeletal indications; or ultrasound (US) exams performed for palpable masses or nonspecific abdominal pain. Familiarity with endometriosis’s characteristic patterns across organ systems and how it can masquerade as other diseases helps radiologists broaden their differential to include endometriosis, even on studies not originally aimed at its detection. This review article will describe those imaging findings of endometriosis affecting various organ systems that mimic other pathologies and will enable the reader to pause and question whether endometriosis should be included in the differential. Graphical abstract Similar content being viewed by others Data availability No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

References

Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Missmer SA. Endometriosis. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(13):1244-1256. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1810764 De Corte P, Klinghardt M, von Stockum S, Heinemann K. Time to Diagnose Endometriosis: Current Status, Challenges and Regional Characteristics-A Systematic Literature Review. BJOG. 2025;132(2):118-130. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17973 Taylor HS, Kotlyar AM, Flores VA. Endometriosis is a chronic systemic disease: clinical challenges and novel innovations. The Lancet. 2021;397(10276):839-852. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00389-5 Zondervan KT, Becker CM, Koga K, Missmer SA, Taylor RN, Viganò P. Endometriosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41572-018-0008-5 Ruaux E, VanBuren WM, Nougaret S, et al. Endometriosis MR mimickers: T2-hypointense lesions. Insights Imaging. 2024;15(1):20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01588-2 Won HR, Abbott J. Optimal managementof chronic cyclical pelvic pain: an evidence-based and pragmatic approach. Int J Womens Health. 2010;2:263-277. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S7991 Sarma D, Iyengar P, Marotta TR, terBrugge KG, Gentili F, Halliday W. Cerebellar Endometriosis. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2004;182(6):1543-1546. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.182.6.1821543 Siquara De Sousa AC, Capek S, Amrami KK, Spinner RJ. Neural involvement in endometriosis: Review of anatomic distribution and mechanisms. Clinical Anatomy. 2015;28(8):1029-1038. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22617 Osório F, Alves J, Pereira J, et al. Obturator Internus Muscle Endometriosis with Nerve Involvement: a Rare Clinical Presentation. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2018;25(2):330-333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.013 Colak C, Chamie LP, Youngner J, et al. MRI Features of Pelvic Nerve Involvement in Endometriosis. RadioGraphics. 2024;44(1):e230106. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.230106 Kale A, Baydili KN s, Keles E, Gundogdu Elif, Usta T, Oral E. Comparison of Isolated Sciatic Nerve and Sacral Nerve Root Endometriosis: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2022;29(8):943-951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2022.05.017 Possover M, Chiantera V. Isolated infiltrative endometriosis of the sciatic nerve: a report of three patients. Fertility and Sterility. 2007;87(2):417.e17-417.e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.084 Howe BM, Amrami KK, Nathan MA, Garcia JJ, Spinner RJ. Perineural spread of cervical cancer to the sciatic nerve. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42(11):1627-1631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-013-1653-0 Joseph J, Sahn SA. Thoracic endometriosis syndrome: New observations from an analysis of 110 cases. The American Journal of Medicine. 1996;100(2):164-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(97)89454-5 Xiao L, White D, Kruger LF, et al. Thoracic endometriosis syndrome: imaging findings and the value of a dedicated MRI protocol. Abdom Radiol. Published online February 18, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04835-w Hwang SM, Lee CW, Lee BS, Park JH. Clinical features of thoracic endometriosis: A single center analysis. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015;58(3):223. https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2015.58.3.223 Rousset P, Rousset-Jablonski C, Alifano M, Mansuet-Lupo A, Buy JN, Revel MP. Thoracic endometriosis syndrome: CT and MRI features. Clinical Radiology. 2014;69(3):323-330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2013.10.014 Bourgioti C, Preza O, Panourgias E, et al. MR imaging of endometriosis: Spectrum of disease. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging. 2017;98(11):751-767. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DIII.2017.05.009 Chamié LP, Ribeiro DMFR, Tiferes DA, Macedo Neto ACD, Serafini PC. Atypical Sites of Deeply Infiltrative Endometriosis: Clinical Characteristics and Imaging Findings. RadioGraphics. 2018;38(1):309-328. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2018170093 Nair SS. Thoracic Endometriosis Syndrome: A Veritable Pandora’s Box. JCDR. Published online 2016. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/17668.7700 Pagano F, Schwander A, Vaineau C, et al. True Prevalence of Diaphragmatic Endometriosis and Its Association with Severe Endometriosis: A Call for Awareness and Investigation. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2023;30(4):329-334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2023.01.006 Clement PB. Pathology of endometriosis. Pathol Annu. 1990;25 Pt 1:245-295. Jha P, Sakala M, Chamie LP, et al. Endometriosis MRI lexicon: consensus statement from the society of abdominal radiology endometriosis disease-focused panel. Abdom Radiol. 2020;45(6):1552-1568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-019-02291-x Biscaldi E, Barra F, Ferrero S. Magnetic Resonance Enema in Rectosigmoid Endometriosis. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America. 2020;28(1):89-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2019.08.006 Meyers WC. Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Colonic Endometriosis. Arch Surg. 1979;114(2):169. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1979.01370260059009 Darvishzadeh A, McEachern W, Lee TK, et al. Deep pelvic endometriosis: a radiologist’s guide to key imaging features with clinical and histopathologic review. Abdom Radiol. 2016;41(12):2380-2400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0956-8 Levitt MD, Hodby KJ, Merwyk AJV, Glancy RJ. CYCLICAL RECTAL BLEEDING IN COLORECTAL ENDOMETRIOSIS. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Surgery. 1989;59(12):941-943. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.1989.tb07635.x Remorgida V, Ferrero S, Fulcheri E, Ragni N, Martin DC. Bowel Endometriosis: Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 2007;62(7):461-470. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000268688.55653.5c Ghosh S, Alhamshari A, Prajapati P, et al. Role of computed tomography in imaging of endometriosis. Abdom Radiol. Published online March 27, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04907-x Yoon JH, Choi D, Jang KT, et al. Deep rectosigmoid endometriosis: “mushroom cap” sign on T2-weighted MR imaging. Abdom Imaging. 2010;35(6):726-731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-010-9643-3 Working group of ESGE, ESHRE, and WES, Keckstein J, Becker CM, et al. Recommendations for the surgical treatment of endometriosis. Part 2: deep endometriosis†‡¶. Human Reproduction Open. 2020; 2020(1):hoaa002. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa002 Bricou A, Batt RE, Chapron C. Peritoneal fluid flow influences anatomical distribution of endometriotic lesions: Why Sampson seems to be right. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2008;138(2):127-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.01.014 Tong A, VanBuren WM, Chamié L, et al. Recommendations for MRI technique in the evaluation of pelvic endometriosis: consensus statement from the Society of Abdominal Radiology endometriosis disease-focused panel. Abdom Radiol. 2020;45(6):1569-1586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02483-w Collin M, Barat M, Oudjit A, et al. Comparison between CT-enterography and MR-enterography for the diagnosis of right-sided deep infiltrating endometriosis of the bowel. European Journal of Radiology. 2023;161:110730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110730 Bazot M, Kermarrec E, Bendifallah S, Daraï E. MRI of intestinal endometriosis. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2021;71:51-63.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.05.013 Jaramillo-Cardoso A, Shenoy-Bhangle AS, VanBuren WM, Schiappacasse G, Menias CO, Mortele KJ. Imaging of gastrointestinal endometriosis: what the radiologist should know. Abdom Radiol. 2020;45(6):1694-1710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-020-02459-w VanBuren W, Feldman M, Shenoy-Bhangle AS, et al. Radiology State-of-the-art Review: Endometriosis Imaging Interpretation and Reporting. Goh V, ed. Radiology. 2024; 312(3):e233482. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.233482 Knabben L, Imboden S, Fellmann B, Nirgianakis K, Kuhn A, Mueller MD. Urinary tract endometriosis in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis: prevalence, symptoms, management, and proposal for a new clinical classification. Fertility and Sterility. 2015;103(1):147-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.028 Gabriel B, Nassif J, Trompoukis P, Barata S, Wattiez A. Prevalence and Management of Urinary Tract Endometriosis: A Clinical Case Series. Urology. 2011;78(6):1269-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2011.07.1403 Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Ferrero S, Candiani M, Somigliana E, Viganò P, Vercellini P. Bladder Endometriosis: A Systematic Review of Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Treatment, Impact on Fertility, and Risk of Malignant Transformation. European Urology. 2017; 71(5):790–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.015 Savelli L, Manuzzi L, Pollastri P, Mabrouk M, Seracchioli R, Venturoli S. Diagnostic accuracy and potential limitations of transvaginal sonography for bladder endometriosis. Ultrasound in Obstet & Gyne. 2009;34(5):595-600. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.7356 Shenoy-Bhangle AS, Pires Franco I, Ray LJ, et al. Imaging of Urinary Bladder and Ureteral Endometriosis with Emphasis on Diagnosis and Technique. Acad Radiol. 2024;31(9):3659-3671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2023.10.053 Saccardi C, Vitagliano A, Litta P. Bladder endometriosis: a summary of current evidence. Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 69(5). https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04059-X Horn LC, Do Minh M, Stolzenburg JU. Intrinsic Form of Ureteral Endometriosis Causing Ureteral Obstruction and Partial Loss of Kidney Function. Urol Int. 2004;73(2):181-184. https://doi.org/10.1159/000079702 Nezhat C, Paka C, Gomaa M, Schipper E. Silentloss of kidney seconary to ureteral endometriosis. JSLS. 2012;16(3):451-455. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13462882736213 Barra F, Scala C, Biscaldi E, et al. Ureteral endometriosis: a systematic review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, risk of malignant transformation and fertility. Human Reproduction Update. 2018;24(6):710-730. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmy027 Shafrir AL, Farland LV, Shah DK, et al. Risk for and consequences of endometriosis: A critical epidemiologic review. Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2018;51:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.06.001 Uimari O, Nazri H, Tapmeier T. Endometriosis and Uterine Fibroids (Leiomyomata): Comorbidity, Risks and Implications. Front Reprod Health. 2021;3:750018. https://doi.org/10.3389/frph.2021.750018 Miao K, Lv Q, Zhang L, Zhao N, Dong X. Discriminative diagnosis of ovarian endometriosis cysts and benign mucinous cystadenomas based on the ConvNeXt algorithm. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024;298:135-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.05.010 Huang KJ, Li YX, Wu CJ, Chang WC, Wei LH, Sheu BC. Sonographic features differentiating early-stage ovarian clear cell carcinoma from endometrioma with atypical features. J Ovarian Res. 2022;15:84. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13048-022-01019-8 Woodard TL, Awonuga AO, Puscheck E. Malignant Transformation of Endometrioma in a Woman with a History of Ovulation Induction and In Vitro Fertilization. Case Rep Med. 2012;2012:497362. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/497362 Chapron C, Pietin-Vialle C, Borghese B, Davy C, Foulot H, Chopin N. Associated ovarian endometrioma is a marker for greater severity of deeply infiltrating endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2009;92(2):453-457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.06.003 Young SW, Jha P, Chamié L, et al. Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus on Routine Pelvic US for Endometriosis. Radiology. 2024;311(1):e232191. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.232191 Sakala MD, Jha P, Tong A, Taffel MT, Feldman MK. MR Imaging of Endometriosis of the Adnexa. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2023;31(1):121-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mric.2022.06.006 Somigliana E, Benaglia L, Paffoni A, Busnelli A, Vigano P, Vercellini P. Risks of conservative management in women with ovarian endometriomas undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(4):486-499. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv012 Orlov S, Sladkevicius P, Rivano Eckerdal I, Jokubkiene L. Morphological changes of endometriomas during pregnancy and after delivery detected using ultrasound. Fertility and Sterility. 2025;123(2):211-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.355 Guerriero S, Conway F, Pascual MA, et al. Ultrasonography and Atypical Sites of Endometriosis. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(6):345. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10060345 Andrade MT, De Freitas CVM, Câmara SFC, Vieira JJN. Umbilical Nodule with Cyclical Bleeding: A Case Report and Literature Review of Atypical Endometriosis. Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;2016:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7401409 Allen SE, Rindos NB, Mansuria S. Abdominal wall endometriosis: an update in diagnosis, perioperative considerations and management. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2021;33(4):288-295. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000000714 Arkoudis NA, Moschovaki-Zeiger O, Prountzos S, Spiliopoulos S, Kelekis N. Caesarean-section scar endometriosis (CSSE): clinical and imaging fundamentals of an underestimated entity. Clinical Radiology. 2023;78(9):644-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2023.05.020 Akdemir A, Akman L, Yavuzsen HT, Zekioglu O. Clinical features of patients with endometriosis on the cesarean scar. The Kaohsiung J of Med Scie. 2014;30(10):541-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2013.12.001 Kido A, Himoto Y, Moribata Y, Kurata Y, Nakamoto Y. MRI in the Diagnosis of Endometriosis and Related Diseases. Korean J Radiol. 2022;23(4):426. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0405 Papadoliopoulou M, Margaris I, Giannakis A, et al. Nuck Canal Endometriosis Following IVF Attempts in a Young Patient—Report of a Case. Clinics and Practice. 2024;14(4):1245-1250. https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract14040100 Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions A.S.B. was responsible for conceptualizing the manuscript. A.S.B., C.C., A.T., L.P., M.T.T., K.S.B., S.G., L.P.C., S.W.Y., and M.K.F. wrote the manuscript and created Figs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12. S.G. was responsible for creating videos 1, 2, 3, 4 as supplementary material. A.S.B., M.K.F., and M.T.T. reviewed and edited the manuscript. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare no competing interests. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Supplementary Information Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material. Supplementary file2 (MP4 19565 kb) Supplementary file3 (MP4 3978 kb) Supplementary file4 (MP4 11019 kb) Supplementary file5 (MP4 4929 kb) Rights and permissions Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. About this article Cite this article Shenoy-Bhangle, A.S., Carnelli, C., Tong, A. et al. Head to toe: expand your diagnosis on routine imaging to include endometriosis. Abdom Radiol 51, 299–315 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-05051-2 Received: Revised: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-05051-2

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

mesh:D004715endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Diagnostic Imaging Diagnostic Imaging Diagnostic Imaging Diagnostic Imaging Diagnostic Imaging Diagnostic Imaging Diagnostic Imaging Diagnostic Imaging Diagnostic Imaging Diagnostic Imaging Diagnostic Imaging Diagnostic Imaging Diagnostic Imaging Diagnostic Imaging Diagnostic Imaging Diagnostic Imaging Diagnostic Imaging Diagnostic Imaging Endometriosis Endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (63)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-27T00:31:19.326749+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK