The Role of the Myometrium in Adenomyosis

In: Uterine Adenomyosis · 2015 · pp. 81–102 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-13012-5_5 · W2297969602
book-chapter OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07+body, 2026-07-09

The myometrium's inner and outer layers exhibit differences, suggesting it may play a role in adenomyosis pathogenesis beyond a simple response to endometrial invasion.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This paper reviews how the uterine myometrium is involved in adenomyosis, focusing on how modern imaging differentiates the inner versus outer myometrium and how uteri with versus without adenomyosis show demonstrable differences. It discusses the classical view that hyperplastic-hypertrophic myometrium represents a response to endometrial invasion, while also highlighting more recent literature suggesting the myometrium may contribute to adenomyosis pathogenesis through innate predisposition. A key limitation is that the chapter emphasizes ongoing disagreement in adenomyosis definitions and diagnostic criteria, which complicates interpretation across studies. This paper is centrally about endometriosis and/or adenomyosis — it is centrally about adenomyosis, specifically the role of the myometrium (inner vs outer layers) in adenomyosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 22,345 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Classically adenomyosis is defined by the presence of ectopic endometrial glands surrounded by ‘hyperplastic-hypertrophic myometrium’. Whilst there remains disagreement on the definition and diagnostic criteria, the diagnosis of adenomyosis by modern imaging relies on the identification of features that distinguish the inner from the outer myometrium. There are demonstrable differences between the inner and outer layers of the myometrium as well as differences between uteri with and without adenmyosis. Myometrial changes have long been regarded as a response to invasion by the endometrium but more recent literature raises the possibility that the myometrium may have a role in the pathogenesis of adenomyosis, perhaps because of innate predisposition. Access this chapter Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout Purchases are for personal use only Similar content being viewed by others

References

Bird CC, McElin TW, Manalo-Estrella P. The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus – revisited. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1972;112:583–93. Cullen TS. Adenomyoma of the uterus. Philadelphia/London: W.B. Saunders Company; 1908. Novak ER, Woodruff JD. Adenomyosis (adenomyoma) uteri. In: Novak's gynecologic and obstetric pathology. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1979. p. 280–90. Hendrickson MR, Kempson RL. Non-neoplastic conditions of the myometrium and uterine serosa. In: Surgical pathology of the uterine corpus. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1980. Langlois PL. The size of the normal uterus. J Reprod Med. 1970;4:220–8. Esmaelzadeh S, Rezaei N, HajiAhmadi M. Normal uterine size in women of reproductive age in northern Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2004;10:437–41. Brosens JJ, de Souza NM, Barker FG, Paraschos T, Winston RM. Endovaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of adenomyosis uteri: identifying the predictive characteristics. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1995;102:471–4. Ascher SM, Arnold LL, Patt RH, Schruefer JJ, Bagley AS, Semelka RC, et al. Adenomyosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography. Radiology. 1994;190:803–6. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, Zanotti F, Brioschi D, Carinelli S. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of adenomyoma versus leiomyoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992;167:603–6. Hirai M, Shibata K, Sagai H, Sekiya S, Goldberg BB. Transvaginal pulsed and color Doppler sonography for the evaluation of adenomyosis. J Ultrasound Med. 1995;14:529–32. Atri M, Reinhold C, Mehio AR, Chapman WB, Bret PM. Adenomyosis: US features with histologic correlation in an in-vitro study. Radiology. 2000;215:783–90. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Raffaelli R, Portuese A, Dorta M. Treatment of adenomyosis-associated menorrhagia with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device. Fertil Steril. 1997;68:426–9. Reinhold C, Atri M, Mehio A, Zakarian R, Aldis AE, Bret PM. Diffuse uterine adenomyosis: morphologic criteria and diagnostic accuracy of endovaginal sonography. Radiology. 1995;197:609–14. Wiczyk HP, Janus CL, Richards CJ, Graf MJ, Gendal ES, Rabinowitz JG, et al. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in evaluating follicular and endometrial development throughout the normal cycle. Fertil Steril. 1988;49:969–72. Demas BE, Hricak H, Jaffe RB. Uterine MR imaging: effects of hormonal stimulation. Radiology. 1986;159:123–6. Mark AS, Hricak H, Heinrichs LW, Hendrickson MR, Winkler ML, Bachica JA, et al. Adenomyosis and leiomyoma: differential diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology. 1987;163:527–9. Reinhold C, Tafazoli F, Wang L. Imaging features of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4:337–49. Fusi L, Cloke B, Brosens JJ. The uterine junctional zone. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;20:479–91. Brown HK, Stoll BS, Nicosia SV. Uterine junctional zone: correlation between histologic findings and MR imaging. Radiology. 1991;179:409–13. Lee JK, Gersell DJ, Balfe DM, Worthington JL, Picus D, Gapp G. The uterus: in vitro MR-anatomic correlation of normal and abnormal specimens. Radiology. 1985;157:175–9. Hauth EA, Jaeger HJ, Libera H, Lange S, Forsting M. MR imaging of the uterus and cervix in healthy women: determination of normal values. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:734–42. Hricak H, Alpers C, Crooks LE, Sheldon PE. Magnetic resonance imaging of the female pelvis: initial experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983;141:1119–28. McCarthy S, Tauber C, Gore J. Female pelvic anatomy: MR assessment of variations during the menstrual cycle and with use of oral contraceptives. Radiology. 1986;160:119–23. McCarthy S, Scott G, Majumdar S, Shapiro B, Thompson S, Lange R, et al. Uterine junctional zone: MR study of water content and relaxation properties. Radiology. 1989;171:241–3. Scoutt LM, Flynn SD, Luthringer DJ, McCauley TR, McCarthy SM. Junctional zone of the uterus: correlation of MR imaging and histologic examination of hysterectomy specimens. Radiology. 1991;179:403–7. Schwalm H, Dubrauszky V. The structure of the musculature of the human uterus – muscles and connective tissue. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1966;94:391–404. Mehasseb MK, Bell SC, Brown L, Pringle JH, Habiba M. Phenotypic characterisation of the inner and outer myometrium in normal and adenomyotic uteri. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;71:217–24. Ijland M, Evers JL, Dunselman GA, Volovics L, Hoogland HJ. Relation between endometrial wavelike activity and fecundability in spontaneous cycles. Fertil Steril. 1997;67:492–6. Fanchin R, Righini C, Olivennes F, Taylor S, de Ziegler D, Frydman R. Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:1968–74. De Vries K, Lyons EA, Ballard G, Levi CS, Lindsay DJ. Contractions of the inner third of the myometrium. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;679–82. Lyons EA, Taylor PJ, Zheng XH, Ballard G, Levi CS, Kredentser JV. Characterisation of subendometrial myometrial contractions throughout the menstrual cycle in normal fertile women. Fertil Steril. 1991;55:771–4. Brosens JJ, de Souza NM, Barker FG. Uterine junctional zone: function and disease. Lancet. 1995;346:558–60. Fraser IS, McCarron G, Markham R, Resta T, Watts A. Measured menstrual blood loss in women with menorrhagia associated with pelvic disease or coagulation disorder. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;68:630–3. Benson RC, Sneeden VD. Adenomyosis: a reappraisal of symptomatology. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1958;76:1044–57; discussion 57–61. Meyer R. Ältere und neuere Gesichtspunkte über die Adenomyohyperplasia (adenomyosis) und die extragenitale Fibroadenomatosis. Zentralbl. Gynäk. 1925:49;1170. Kissler S, Hamscho N, Zangos S, Wiegratz I, Schlichter S, Menzel C, et al. Uterotubal transport disorder in adenomyosis and endometriosis--a cause for infertility. BJOG. 2006;113:902–8. Habiba MA. Radionuclide migration through the genital tract in infertile women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:1193–5. Lundberg S, Wramsby H, Bremmer S, Lundberg HJ, Asard PE. Radionuclide hysterosalpingography does not distinguish between fertile women, before tubal sterilization, and infertile women. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:275–8. Lundberg S, Wramsby H, Bremmer S, Lundberg HJ, Asard PE. Radionuclide hysterosalpingography is not predictive in the diagnosis of infertility. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:216–20. Wanggren K, Wramsby H, Bremmer S, Lundberg S, Jacobsson H. Radionuclide hysterosalpingography is not a reliable tool for investigation of fallopian tube transport--a controlled randomized study using particles of two sizes during three different parts of the menstrual cycle. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2011;72:20–4. Leyendecker G, Kunz G, Noe M, Herbertz M, Mall G. Endometriosis: a dysfunction and disease of the archimetra. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4:752–62. Werth R, Grusdew W. Untersuchungen uber die entwicklung und morphologie der menschlichen uterusmuskulatur. Arch Gynakol. 1898;55:325–409. Emge LA. The elusive adenomyosis of the uterus. Its historical past and its present state of recognition. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1962;83:1541–63. Marcus CC. Relationship of adenomyosis uteri to endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1961;82:408–16. Uduwela AS, Perera MA, Aiqing L, Fraser IS. Endometrial-myometrial interface: relationship to adenomyosis and changes in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2000;55:390–400. Noe N, Kunz G, Herbertz M, Mall G, Leyendecker G. The cyclic pattern of the immunocytochemical expression of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in human myometrial and endometrial layers: characterization of the endometrial-subendometrial unit. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:190–7. Konishi I, Fujii S, Okamura H, Mori T. Development of smooth muscle in the human fetal uterus: an ultrastructural study. J Anat. 1984;139(Pt 2):239–52. Robboy SJ, Taguchi O, Cunha GR. Normal development of the human female reproductive tract and alterations resulting from experimental exposure to diethylstilbesterol. Hum Pathol. 1982;13:191–8. Wetzstein R. Der Uterusmuskel: Morphologie. Arch Gynecol. 1965;202:1–13. Lebedev NP. Uber den architektouischen Bau des Myometriums. Akush i Ginek. 1952;64. Mehasseb MK, Bell SC, Habiba MA. Neonatal administration of tamoxifen causes disruption of myometrial development but not adenomyosis in the C57/BL6J mouse. Reproduction 2010; In Press. Mehasseb MK, Bell SC, Habiba MA. The effects of tamoxifen and estradiol on myometrial differentiation and organization during early uterine development in the CD1 mouse. Reproduction. 2009;138:341–50. Metaxa-Mariatou V, McGavigan CJ, Robertson K, Stewart C, Cameron IT, Campbell S. Elastin distribution in the myometrial and vascular smooth muscle of the human uterus. Mol Hum Reprod. 2002;8:559–65. Kohnen G, Campbell S, Jeffers MD, Cameron IT. Spatially regulated differentiation of endometrial vascular smooth muscle cells. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:284–92. Leppert PC, Yu SY. Three-dimensional structures of uterine elastic fibers: scanning electron microscopic studies. Connect Tissue Res. 1991;27:15–31. Zheng WQ, Ma R, Zheng JM, Gong ZJ. Elastin distribution in the normal uterus, uterine leiomyomas, adenomyosis and adenomyomas: a comparison. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 2006;28:115–20. Scharl A, Vierbuchen M, Graupner J, Fischer R, Bolte A. Immunohistochemical study of distribution of estrogen receptors in corpus and cervix uteri. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1988;241:221–33. Mertens HJMM, Heineman MJ, Theunissen PHMH, de Jong FH, Evers JLH. Androgen, estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in the human uterus during the menstrual cycle. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;98:58–65. Kawaguchi K, Fujii S, Konishi I, Iwai T, Nanbu Y, Nonogaki H, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of oestrogen receptors, progesterone receptors and Ki-67 in leiomyoma and myometrium during the menstrual cycle and pregnancy. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1991;419:309–15. Snijders MP, De Goeji AF, Debets-Te Baerts MJ, Rosch MJ, Koudstaal J, Bosman FT. Immunocytochemical analysis of oestrogen receptors and progesterone receptors in the human uterus throughout the menstrual cycle and after the menopause. J Reprod Fertil. 1992;94:363–71. Lessey BA, Killam AP, Metzger DA, Haney AF, Greene GL, McCarty Jr KS. Immunohistochemical analysis of human uterine estrogen and progesterone receptors throughout the menstrual cycle. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988;67:334–40. Amso NN, Crow JC, Shaw RW. Comparative immunohistochemical study of oestrogen and progesterone receptors in the Fallopian tube and uterus at different stages of the menstrual cycle and the menopause. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:1027–37. Richards PA, Tiltman AJ. Anatomical variation of the oestrogen receptor in normal myometrium. Virchows Arch. 1995;427:303–7. Mehasseb MK, Panchal R, Taylor AH, Brown L, Bell SC, Habiba M. Estrogen and progesterone receptor isoform distribution through the menstrual cycle in uteri with and without adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:2228–35, 35 e1. Mylonas I, Jeschke U, Shabani N, Kuhn C, Balle A, Kriegel S, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of estrogen receptor alpha, estrogen receptor beta and progesterone receptor in normal human endometrium. Acta Histochem. 2004;106:245–52. Mylonas I, Jeschke U, Shabani N, Kuhn C, Kunze S, Dian D, et al. Steroid receptors ERalpha, ERbeta, PR-A and PR-B are differentially expressed in normal and atrophic human endometrium. Histol Histopathol. 2007;22:169–76. Lecce G, Meduri G, Ancelin M, Bergeron C, Perrot-Applanat M. Presence of estrogen receptor b in the human endometrium through the cycle: expression in glandular, stromal, and vascular cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:1379–86. Matsuzaki S, Fukaya T, Suzuki T, Murakami T, Sasano H, Yajima A. Oestrogen receptor a and b mRNA expression in human endometrium throughout the menstrual cycle. Mol Hum Reprod. 1999;5:559–64. Critchley HO, Saunders PT. Hormone receptor dynamics in a receptive human endometrium. Reprod Sci. 2009;16:191–9. Speirs V, Green CA, Shaaban AM. Oestrogen receptor b immunohistochemistry: time to get it right? J Clin Pathol. 2008;61:1150–1. Maia Jr H, Casoy J, Correia T, Freitas L, Pimentel K, Athayde C, et al. Effect of the menstrual cycle and oral contraceptives on aromatase and cyclooxygenase-2 expression in adenomyosis. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2006;22:547–51. Takahashi K, Nagata H, Kitao M. Clinical usefulness of determination of estradiol level in the menstrual blood for patients with endometriosis. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1989;41:1849–50. McCormack SA, Glasser SR. Differential response of individual uterine cell types from immature rats treated with estradiol. Endocrinology. 1980;106:1634–49. King RJ, Townsend PT, Whitehead MI, Young O, Taylor RW. Biochemical analyses of separated epithelium and stroma from endometria of premenopausal and postmenopausal women receiving estrogen and progestins. J Steroid Biochem. 1981;14:979–87. Shiozawa T, Li S-F, Nakayama K, Fujii S. Relationship between the expression of cyclins/cyclin-dependent kinases and sex-steroid receptors/ Ki67 in normal human endometrial glands and stroma during the menstrual cycle. Mol Hum Reprod. 1996;2:745–52. Graham JD, Clarke CL. Physiological action of progesterone in target tissues. Endocrinol Rev. 1997;18:502–9. Azziz R. Adenomyosis: current perspectives. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1989;16:221–35. Moghissi KS. Treatment of endometriosis with estrogen-progestin combination and progestogens alone. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1988;31:823–8. Wood C. Surgical and medical treatment of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4:323–36. Maia Jr H, Maltez A, Coelho G, Athayde C, Coutinho EM. Insertion of mirena after endometrial resection in patients with adenomyosis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2003;10:512–6. Kunz G, Leyendecker G. Uterine peristaltic activity during the menstrual cycle: characterization, regulation, function and dysfunction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;4 Suppl 3:5–9. Kunz G, Bell D, Deininger H, Wildt L, Leyendecker G. The dynamics of rapid sperm transport through the female genital tract. Evidence from vaginal sonography of uterine peristalsis (VSUP) and hysterosalpingoscintigraphy (HSSG). Hum Reprod. 1996;11:627–32. Kunz G, Beil D, Huppert P, Leyendecker G. Structural abnormalities of the uterine wall in women with endometriosis and infertility visualized by vaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:76–82. Quinn M. Uterine innervation in adenomyosis. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;27:287–91. Laguens R, Lagrutta J. Fine structure of human uterine muscle in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1964;89:1040–7. Dessouky DA. Ultrastructural observations of the human uterine smooth muscle cells during gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1976;125:1099–107. Mark JST. An electron microscopy study of uterine smooth muscle. Anat Rec. 1956;125:473–91. Jaeger J. Zur Ultrastruktur der menschliehen Uterus-Muskelzelle unter der Geburt. Archiv fur Gyngkologie. 1963;199:173–81. Jaeger J. Zur Ultrastruktur des bindegewebigen Anteils der Uterusmuskulatur. Arch Gynakol. 1965;202:59–62. Jaeger J. Elektronenmikroskopisehe Untersuehungen an der menschliehen Uterusmuskulatur (znr nerviisen Innervation der glatten Muskelzellen). Arch Gynakol. 1967;204:63–6. Jaeger J. Der intercelluläre Kontakt der glatten Muskelzellen. Arch Gynakol. 1971;211:351–4. Shoenberg CF. The contractile mechanism and ultrastructure of the myometrium. In: Wynn RM, editor. Biology of the uterus. New York/London: Plenum Press; 1977. p. 497–544. Leoni P, Carli F, Halliday D. Intermediate filaments in smooth muscle from pregnant and non-pregnant human uterus. Biochem J. 1990;269:31–4. Eyden BP, Hale RJ, Richmond I, Buckley CH. Cytoskeletal filaments in the smooth muscle cells of uterine leiomyomata and myometrium: an ultrastructural and immunohistochemical analysis. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol. 1992;420:51–8. Huitfeldt HS, Brandtzaeg P. Various keratin antibodies produce immunohistochemical staining of human myocardium and myometrium. Histochemistry. 1985;83:381–9. Brown DC, Theaker JM, Banks PM, Gatter KC, Mason DY. Cytokeratin expression in smooth muscle and smooth muscle tumours. Histopathology. 1987;11:477–86. Norton AJ, Thomas JA, Isaacson PG. Cytokeratin-specific monoclonal antibodies are reactive with tumours of smooth muscle derivation. An immunocytochemical and biochemical study using antibodies to intermediate filament cytoskeletal proteins. Histopathology. 1987;11:487–99. Ramaekers FC, Pruszczynski M, Smedts F. Cytokeratins in smooth muscle cells and smooth muscle tumours. Histopathology. 1988;12:558–61. Tauchi K, Tsutsumi Y, Yoshimura S, Watanabe K. Immunohistochemical and immunoblotting detection of cytokeratin in smooth muscle tumors. Acta Pathol Jpn. 1990;40:574–80. Turley H, Pulford KA, Gatter KC, Mason DY. Biochemical evidence that cytokeratins are present in smooth muscle. Br J Exp Pathol. 1988;69:433–40. Evans DJ, Lampert IA, Jacobs M. Intermediate filaments in smooth muscle tumours. J Clin Pathol. 1983;36:57–61. Taggart MJ, Morgan KG. Regulation of the uterine contractile apparatus and cytoskeleton. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2007;18:296–304. Jaeger J, Pohlmann G. On the ultrastructure of human myometrium cells. Beitr Pathol Anat. 1962;126:113–26. Ross R, Klebanoff SJ. Fine structural changes in uterine smooth muscle and fibroblasts in response to estrogen. J Cell Biol. 1967;32:155–67. Friederici HH, DeCloux RJ. The early response of immature rat myometrium to estrogenic stimulation. J Ultrastruct Res. 1968;22:402–12. Althoff RW, Albert EN. Ultrastructural changes in mouse myometrium during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1970;108:1224–33. Cole WC, Garfield RE. Ultrastructure of the myometrium. In: Wynn RM, Jollie WP, editors. Biology of the uterus, vol. 455–504. New York: Plenum; 1989. Fujii S, Konishi I, Mori T. Smooth muscle differentiation at endometrio-myometrial junction. An ultrastructural study. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol. 1989;414:105–12. Gabbiani G, Ryan GB, Majno G. Presence of modified fibroblasts in granulation tissue and their possible role in wound contracture. Experimentia. 1971;27:549. Ghahdially FN. Ultrastructural Pathology of the Cell and Matrix. London: Butterworth; 1982. p. 658–63. Bird CC, Willis RA. The production of smooth muscle by the endometrial stroma of the adult human uterus. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1965;90:75–81. Bo WJ, Odor DL, Rothrock ML. Ultrastructure of uterine smooth muscle following progesterone or progesterone-estrogen treatment. Anat Rec. 1969;163:121–31. Bo WJ, Odor DL, Rothrock M. The fine structure of uterine smooth muscle of the rat uterus at various time intervals following a single injection of estrogen. Am J Anat. 1968;123:369–84. Kawaguchi K, Fujii S, Konishi I, Okamura H, Mori T. Ultrastructural study of cultured smooth muscle cells from uterine leiomyoma and myometrium under the influence of sex steroids. Gynecol Oncol. 1985;21:32–41. Mehasseb MK, Bell SC, Pringle JH, Habiba MA. Uterine adenomyosis is associated with ultrastructural features of altered contractility in the inner myometrium. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:2130–6. Dito WR, Batsakis JG. Norethynodrel-treated endometriosis: a morphological and histochemical study. Obstet Gynecol. 1961;18:1–12. Cotran RS, Kumar V, Robbins SL. Robbins pathologic basis of disease. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1989. Loud AV, Olivetti G, Anversa P. Morphometric measurement of cellular hypertrophy. Lab Invest. 1983;49:230–4. Owens GK, Rabinovitch PS, Schwartz SM. Smooth muscle cell hypertrophy versus hyperplasia in hypertension. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78:7759–63. Lane BP. Alterations in the cytologic detail of intestinal smooth muscle cells in various stages of contraction. J Cell Biol. 1965;27:199–213. North AJ, Galazkiewicz B, Byers TJ, Glenney JRJ, Small JV. Complementary distributions of vinculin and dystrophin define two distinct sarcolemma domains in smooth muscle. J Cell Biol. 1993;120:1159–67. Fujimoto T. Calcium pump of the plasma membrane is localized in caveolae. J Cell Biol. 1993;5:1147–57. Goto Y, Yoshikane H, Honda M, Morioka S, Yamori Y, Moriyama K. Three-dimensional observation on sarcoplasmic reticulum and caveolae in myocardium of spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol. 1993;22:535–42. Richards PA, Richards PDG, Tiltman AJ. The ultrastructure of fibromyomatous myometrium and its relationship to infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 1998;4:520–5. Yamamoto T, Noguchi T, Tamura T, Kitawaki J, Okada H. Evidence for estrogen synthesis in adenomyotic tissues. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993;169:734–8. Tamaya T, Motoyama T, Ohono Y, Ide N, Tsurusaki T, Okada H. Steroid receptor levels and histology of endometriosis and adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 1979;31:396–400. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Editor information Editors and Affiliations Rights and permissions Copyright information © 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland About this chapter Cite this chapter Habiba, M., Benagiano, G. (2016). The Role of the Myometrium in Adenomyosis. In: Habiba, M., Benagiano, G. (eds) Uterine Adenomyosis. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13012-5_5 Download citation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13012-5_5 Published: Publisher Name: Springer, Cham Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13011-8 Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13012-5 eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (100)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK