Radionuclide Hysterosalpingography Is Not a Reliable Tool for Investigation of Fallopian Tube Transport – A Controlled Randomized Study Using Particles of Two Sizes during Three Different Parts of the Menstrual Cycle

In: Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation · 2010 · vol. 72(1) , pp. 20–24 · doi:10.1159/000321795 · PMID:21196688 · W2062623108
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08

Radionuclide hysterosalpingography using particles of two sizes during three menstrual cycle phases was inconclusive, suggesting it is not a reliable tool for investigating fallopian tube transport.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Earlier studies with radionuclide hysterosalpingography (RN-HSG) using either small or large particles have shown different results. Some studies have questioned the clinical relevance of RN-HSG. The aim of this study was to evaluate the RN-HSG method using two different sizes of radio-labelled particles during different parts of the menstrual cycle. METHODS: Ten healthy women, 28-40 years of age (mean 34.5), with proven fertility, regular menstrual cycle, not using oral contraceptives and due to undergo laparoscopic sterilization, were randomized to RN-HSG after deposition of a solution with either small Albures or large MAASOL, (99m)Tc-radio-labelled particles into the cervix uteri. Investigations were, for every patient, performed during the follicular, peri-ovulatory and mid-luteal parts of the menstrual cycle. Transport of radioactivity from cervix to uterus and Fallopian tubes was evaluated. RESULTS: The RN-HSG investigations could not show any difference between the two different sizes of radio-labelled particles. Transport of radioactivity to the Fallopian tube was seen only in some cases and most frequently during the peri-ovulatory period. CONCLUSION: We found the RN-HSG investigations inconclusive. The RN-HSG method does not seem to be a reliable tool for the investigation of Fallopian tube transport.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (2)

Cited by (2)

References (18)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-14T06:05:00.350814+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK