Endometriosi: il punto di vista dell’anatomo-patologo. Valutazioni morfologiche ed immunoistochimiche

2005 · pp. 313–316 · W1829786611
article OA: green CC0
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-10

This paper reviews the morphological and immunohistochemical evaluations of endometriosis, noting its prevalence, histological characteristics, and classification patterns.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10

This paper discusses endometriosis from the anatomopathologist’s perspective, focusing on morphological patterns and immunohistochemical evaluation, based on 1,560 histologic cases from 1,114 women (with detailed note of 330 biopsies in 2003) analyzed at Policlinico Gemelli. It describes typical histology as the presence of both epithelial and stromal components, highlights the four-pattern classification proposed by Abrao et al. (differentiated glandular, pure stromal, mixed, and undifferentiated glandular), and notes that some lesions may be difficult to interpret on H&E alone, requiring immunohistochemistry; markers mentioned include cytokeratins 7, CA 125, and CD10. A limitation explicitly acknowledged is that immunohistochemical markers can be nonspecific (e.g., CD10 positivity in certain neoplastic and mesothelial contexts), and morphological atypia/endometriosis-associated malignancy is emphasized as a context requiring careful interpretation. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it reviews diagnostic morphology and immunohistochemical tools, and relates endometriosis patterns and atypia to treatment response and malignant transformation.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (9)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK