Intro
Endometriosis is an endometrial inflammatory disease
that affects 5 to 10% of women in reproductive age. Its
main feature is the presence of endometrium-like tissue
in sites other than the uterus. These extra uterine tissues
appear mostly on the ovaries and peritoneum. The main
clinical symptoms are chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia,
and infertility. Although the exact mechanism and
pathology of the disease remains unclear, there are distinct
molecular and immunologic differences between normal
endometrium and eutopic or ectopic endometriosis tissue.
Overproduction of estrogen and cytokines, progesterone
resistance, and most importantly epigenetic deregulation
of gene expression in endometriotic tissue are recently
investigated. Gene-expression profiling of endometrium
from women with endometriosis has revealed the
candidate genes related to implantation failure, infertility,
and progesterone resistance as compared to endometriosisfree
women ( 1 , 2 ).
Several studies have failed to show a major pure
genetic contribution in endometriosis. However, a
number of studies have emphasized on epigenetics as a
major underlying pathogenic mechanism. For example,
genome-wide methylation analysis has indicated that in
endometriosis, there is DNA methylation abnormalities,
like expression of clusters of genes involved in
differentiation through GATA family transcription factors
( 3 ), which are the proteins that bind to DNA and regulate
many functions, like differentiation. Progesterone
resistance and abnormal decidualization present in
endometrial tissues are the other supporting evidences
for differentiation defect in endometriosis ( 4 ). These
findings have indicated that epigenetic deregulation
might be involved in the main biological processes found
in endometriosis ( 5 ).
Endometriosis is also known as a stem cell disorder
that is the underlying mechanism in extra endometrium
implantation. Although the exact stem cell pathology
and its mechanisms are still unclear, abnormalities in
cell motility and invasive capacity have been reported
in endometriosis ( 6 ). Furthermore, it has been shown
that decreased level of proteins expression involved
in cell adhesion and cytoskeleton and lower level
of proteolytic activity promote endometriotic lesion
growth in endometriosis ( 7 - 11 ). These abnormalities
in stem cells might be in part mediated by microRNAs
(miRNAs) deregulations. It has been mentioned that an
abnormal decrease or increase in miRNAs expression
in endometriotic stromal cells lead to up-regulation of
miR-503 expression, down-regulation of microRNA,
inhibition of proliferation, as well as promotion of
apoptosis ( 12 ). However, proliferation of endometrial
stromal cells (ESC), cell invasiveness and motility
are known to be increased in endometriosis, mostly by
epigenetic mechanisms and miRNAs ( 13 ).
miRNAs are non-coding RNAs of 18-25 nucleotide
long that regulate post-transcriptional gene expression
by hybridizing to the complementary regions of target
mRNA, leading to inhibition of translation with or without
degradation of the mRNA level. Among miRNAs, miR31
is a key player in spermatogenesis, implantation, and
embryo development ( 14 ). Furthermore, miR-31 controls
several vital processes. In breast cancer and liver cancer,
down-regulated miR-31 acts as a tumor suppressor, while
in colorectal cancer, cervical cancer and lung cancer, up-
regulated miR-31 is considered as oncomir. In addition,
miR-31 acts as a prognostic biomarker. High expression
level of miR-31 is correlated to shorter survival in patients
with malignant pleural mesothelioma, whereas normal/
low expression of miR-31 is associated with longer
survival in this patients ( 15 ). miR-31 also plays important
roles in fertility and pathogenesis of endometriosis through
down-regulating FOXP3 ( 16 ). Despite relevant strong
supporting evidences, the role of miR-31 in endometriosis
has not yet been studied.
On the other hand, miR-145 is shown to be a regulator
of endothelial cell function and increase cell proliferation
and invasiveness in tumors stem cells ( 17 - 22 ). Wang et
al. ( 23 ) have found that in the serum of patients with
endometriosis, miR-145 is down-regulated using
circulating miRNA array in comparison to the control
women. Therefore, their results have suggested that
microRNAmay be a potential biomarker of endometriosis.
In addition, miR-145 down-regulates posttranscriptionally
the pluripotency factor SOX2 and stemness-associated
Musashi RNA binding protein 2 (MSI2).
It seems that miR-31 with its wide and complex functions
in apoptosis, differentiation, proliferation and invasiveness,
as well as miR-145 with its proved influence on local
invasiveness, proliferation and stemness of endometriotic
cells may be involved in the pathogenesis of endometriosis.
Considering this hypothesis, we tried to analyze the plasma
level of these two miRNAs in patients with endometriosis
to have a clear understanding of the pathogenesis of
endometriosis and find potential functional biomarkers.
Results
Patients presented with infertility and dysmenorrhea in
38 and 29%, respectively.
To explore miRNAs profiling from plasma samples,
the expression levels of miR-145 and miR-31 were
evaluated by qPCR in endometriosis plasma as compared
to the control group. The efficiency of qPCR reactions for
miR-31 and miR-145 were 97.3 and 101.8, respectively
( Fig .1 ). Melting curves showed no nonspecific or primer
dimer peaks ( Fig .2 ). We showed that the expression
levels of miR-31 in stage 3 or 4 and stage 1 or 2 were
significantly down-regulated (less than 0.01-fold,
P<0.05), whereas the expression level of miR-145 was
up-regulated in endometriosis women in stage 1 or 2. The
expression level of miR-145 in stage 3 or 4 in the patient
group was up-regulated more than 1.4-fold, indicating
that it did not reach to a significance level. miR-145 was
significantly up-regulated in stage 1 or 2 more than 6.7(P<0.05, Fig .3 ).
Standard curves. A. miR-31, B. miR-145, and C. miR-103-3p.
Efficiencies of amplifications are 97.3 (R 2 =0.98), 101.8 (R 2 =0.974) and
100.958 (R 2 =0.999), respectively. R 2 ; The coefficient of correlation and Ct;
Cycle threshold.
Melting curves of quantitative polymerase chain reactions (qPCR) of
miR-31 and miR145. There is no nonspecific or significant dimmer primer
peak confirming the specificity of reactions.
Expression analysis of miR-31 and miR-145 in patients with endometriosisstage 1 or 2 and stage 3 or 4. Relative expressions of different groups are shownin comparison with normal controls. A. The relative expression of miR-31 in stages1 or 2 and stages 3 or 4 compared with Normal and B. The relative expression ofmiR-145 in stages 1 or 2 and stages 3 or 4 compared with normal. In stage 1 or2, the expression level of miR-145 was increased by 6.7-fold (P<0.05), whereas theexpression level of miR-31 was decreased [relative quantity (RQ)<0.01, P<0.05)]. Instage 3 or 4, the expression level of miR-145 was increased by 1.4-fold, suggestingthis change did not reach to a statistical significance level. The expression level of
miR-31 was decreased as compared to normal controls (RQ<0.01, P<0.05).
Discussion
Endometriosis is a hormone dependent inflammatory
disease, in which the role of pure genetic variations
is minor, while environmental and epigenetic factors
are mainly involved. Many cellular functions like
differentiation, proliferation, mitochondria, reactive
oxygen species (ROS) production, invasion and
decidualization are deregulated in this disease. miRNAs,
including miR-31 and miR-145, regulate many of these
biological processes in different pathologies, especially
in cancers. Clinical signs and symptoms are insufficient to
help an early diagnosis Therefore, there is an urgent need
to find biomarkers for early selection of patients with
high risk of endometriosis and confirmatory diagnosis by
laparoscopy and pathological examination.
We found that in patients with stage 3 or 4 endometriosis,
miR-31 was down-regulated as compared to normal
women. In addition, our results demonstrated down-
regulation of miR-31 and significant up-regulation of
miR-145 in patients with stage 1 or 2 endometriosis. Our
findings also indicated that although several miRNAs
were deregulated in endometriosis ( 25 ), miR-31 and miR145
may be considered as potential biomarkers for noninvasive
diagnosis of patients with endometriosis.
Infertility in patients with endometriosis is due to
mechanical as well as functional abnormalities of
endometrium. Decidualization defect and abnormal
receptivity are the main mechanisms that can explain
infertility in endometriosis ( 5 ). In concordance, our
findings showed that miR-31 as one of the factors
influencing decidualization was down-regulated in
patients with endometriosis in all stages as compared
to endometrium of normal controls. miR-31 is a highly
conserved miRNA in evolution that acts as a vital factor
in embryonic implantation and development, as well
as immune system balance. Deregulation of miR-31 is
correlated to some cancers and autoimmune diseases
partly by epigenetic modifications, like methylation and
acetylation ( 14 ). Although many biomarkers in plasma are
not functional and as surrogate biomarkers show no role
in pathology, some others are involved in controlling the
pathogenic processes ( 25 ). Due to the regulatory role of
miR-31on biological and vital processes in endometriosis,
its down-regulation might be an underlying epigenetic
mechanism in the pathogenesis.
Cosar et al. ( 26 ) have showed that miR-145 is up-
regulated 10-fold higher in patients with endometriosis.
However, we found that an increase in miR-145 is mostly
in stage 1 or 2, whereas there was a relative decrease in
the expression of miR-145 in stage 3 or 4. Adammek et
al. ( 27 ) have indicated that miR-145 inhibits proliferation,
while its over-expression can inhibit proliferation rates
up to 45%. In addition, invasiveness was decreased by
80%. A relative decrease in the expression of miR-145
in our patients with moderate to severe endometriosis
might promote an increase in proliferation that was seen
in more advanced stages of the disease. Although the
pathogenesis of endometriosis is unknown, it is believed
that endometriosis is a disease of stem cells. Stemness
has been studied in endometriosis. There is an overall
increase in expression of genes involved in stemness in
ectopic as compared to eutopic tissues of patients with
endometriosis ( 28 ). More specifically, the genes UTF1,
TCL1 and ZFP42 show a trend for higher expression in
endometriosis than in normal endometrium. However,
expressions of other genes involved in stemness are
not significantly different between endometriosis and
normal endometrium. miR-31 is directly correlated to
stemness in some cancers. Its expression increases the
expression of Nanog/Sox2/oct4 in cancers ( 29 ). On the
other hand, stemness seems to be de-regulated in eutopic
endometrium of patients with endometriosis as compared
to normal endometrium. Overexpression of miR-200b
which is down-regulated in endometriosis can increase
stemness-associated side population phenotype ( 13 ).
miR-145 is also a regulator of stemness. Down-
regulation of miR-145 in patients with stage 3 or 4 as
compared with patients in stage 1 or 2 indicates the roles
of miR-145 in down-regulation of the pluripotency factors
and MSI2. A decrease in miR-145 relative expression
in more advanced stages might be the underlying cause
of increased invasiveness and proliferation, as well as
increased expression of stemness related genes, which are
found to be up-regulated in endometriosis ( 13 ).
Relative down-regulation of miR-145 may promote
the progression of the disease from milder stages to
more severe stages. In other words, increased expression
of miR-145 may inhibit proliferation and promote
differentiation ( 30 ) in stage 1 or 2, while the disease is
still mild. However, when the disease progress to more
severe clinical forms, stage 3 or 4, the expression level
of miR-145 decreases. It has been shown that increased
expression level of miR-145 is involved in infertility
and repeated implantation failure ( 31 ), which is also the
common features of endometriosis.
It is noteworthy that migration and invasion are
controlled by miR-31 in cancer cells. Over-expression
of miR-31 inhibits MDA-MB-231 cell migration and
invasion, while down-regulation of miR-31 promotes
MCF-7 cell migration and invasion ( 32 ). In addition
to invasion inhibition, miR-31 is a proapoptotic agent.
Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs) can induce
apoptosis through miR-31 induction ( 33 ). Endometriosis
consists primarily of stromal cells with low rate of
apoptosis, little differentiation and more invasiveness
( 34 ). Nasu et al. ( 35 ) have showed that in endometriosis,
there is a resistance to apoptosis. Lack of normal immune
responses to endometrial cells, in addition to a decrease
in apoptosis, facilitate proliferation and the implantation
of ectopic endometrial tissues ( 36 ). A decrease in the
expression of miR-31 may induce resistance in apoptosis
and increase proliferation found in endometriosis. miR31
that is increased during the window of implantation is
known as a potential biomarker of optimum receptivity
( 37 ). Our findings showed that in the plasma of patients
with endometriosis, there is a decrease of miR31
expression level, suggesting that it was a sign of
lower receptivity found in endometriosis in previous
studies ( 5 , 38 ). Increased production of estrogens and
prostaglandins, as well as progesterone resistance are
correlated to the pathogenesis of endometriosis in eutopic
tissues of patients with endometriosis as compared to
women without endometriosis ( 39 ). Progesterone as
a differentiating agent is necessary in implantation.
Decidualization, which is defected in endometriosis, is
under the control of progesterone. A significant decrease
in miR-31 that is present in patients with endometriosis
could be the underlying cause. As shown in cancers,
miRNA has a p53 related anti proliferative activity ( 40 ),
and p53 has a balancing role between differentiation and
proliferation ( 41 ).
Although the pathways are still unclear in endometriosis,
recent findings have strongly supported an epigenetic role
in the underlying pathology of this disease, especially
in miRNAs. Mostly, several miRNAs are important in
the pathogenesis and treatment of endometriosis. Since
miRNAs expressions are highly specific in tissues and
tumors, they may be the potential biomarkers of early
diagnosis for the new treatment strategies.
Conclusions
Overall, we found that miR-31 was under-expressed in
patients with endometriosis, while miR-145 is over-expressed
in stage 1 or 2 and relatively under-expressed in more severe
forms of the disease. It means that deregulated expression of
miR-31 may explain the dysfunctions related to this disease.
Furthermore, our findings indicated that expression analysis
of these miRNAs in the plasma may serve as potential
biomarkers in noninvasive diagnosis of endometriosis, while
their deregulated expression provides an understanding of the
mechanism of pathogenesis of endometriosis.
Statistical
All results were expressed as the mean ± SE. Statistical
analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5 software
(GraphPad, USA). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)
was applied for comparison of the differences between
groups. REST Software was also used to calculate relative
quantity (RQ) of the expressions using Pffafl formula.
Materials Methods
In this case-control study approved by the Tarbiat
Modares University Ethics Committee, based on revised
American Society of Reproductive Medicine (rASRM)
guidelines ( 24 ), we recruited 34 patients with histologically
proven endometriosis stage 3 or 4 (moderate or severe forms,
respectively) and 21 patients with stage 1 or 2 (minimal and
mild forms, respectively). There was also a control group
including 23 endometriosis-free patients who underwent
laparoscopic examination for other indications than infertility,
like prolapsed uterus, ovarian cyst, or urinary incontinence.
Exclusion criteria of the control group were presence of other
endometrial pathologies like myoma or fibroma. Exclusion
criteria of the patients groups were the presence of signs and
symptoms of endometriosis, like infertility and dysmenorrhea.
Exclusion criteria for both patient and control groups were
presence of systematic inflammation diseases and infections,
ongoing pregnancy, history of pregnancy in the last 3 months,
cancer, and other major systemic diseases. The mean age of
patients was 28 ( 23 - 34 ) years. All subjects were enrolled in
this study after a standard genetic counseling and signing an
informed consent form.
To investigate the circulating miRNAs in plasma from
patients and controls, 5 ml peripheral blood samples
were collected in heparinized tubes before laparoscopy.
Then, tubes were centrifuged at 1900 rpm for 10
minutes at room temperature. Plasma was collected in
a sterile 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tubes RNase free and
cryopreserved at -80°C. To evaluate the expression of
hsa-mir-145 and hsa-mir-31 in endometriosis, miRNAs
were isolated from samples using miRCURY RNA
Isolation Kits-Biofluids (Exiqon, Denmark) according to
manufacturers’ instructions. miRNAs were eluted in 50µl
of nuclease free water. For first-strand cDNA synthesis
reaction, miRCURY LNA™ Universal RT miRNA
polymerase chain reaction (PCR), polyadenylation
and cDNA synthesis kit (Exiqon, Denmark) were used.
Briefly, each reverse transcription reaction consisted of 2
µl 5X reaction buffer, 1 µl enzyme mix, 0.5 µl synthetic
RNA spike-ins, 4.5 µl nuclease free water, and a final
concentration of 100 ng/µl of total RNA. RT reaction was
performed using an Applied BiosystemsVeriti™ thermal
cycler (Life Technologies, USA) at 42°C for 10 minutes,
followed by heat-inactivation at 95°C for 5 minutes, and
stored at 4°C. Real-time PCR was carried out using an
Applied Biosystems StepOne Real-Time PCR System
(Life Technologies, USA). For quantitative PCR (qPCR),
10 µl PCR reaction mixture was prepared using ExiLENT
SYBR® Green PCR master mix (Exiqon, Denmark) as
recommended by manufacturer. Briefly, 5 µl of 2XSYBR
Green master mix, 4 µl of diluted cDNA (1:4) and 1 µl of
LNA primer mix were added. Then, has-mir-103-3p was
used as the endogenous control. qPCR was performed at
95°C for 10 minutes for polymerase activation followed by
45 cycles of 95°C for 10 seconds and 60°C for 1 minutes.
Finally, melting curve analysis was performed based of
the dissociation characteristics of double stranded DNA
during cycles with increasing denaturing temperature.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.