Vaginal endometrial stromal sarcoma: A literature review

The patients’ ages ranged from 32 to 57(43+/−8.7) years. Their symptoms included vaginal mass (4 patients), vaginal bleeding (7), vaginal discharge (1), pelvic mass (1), and pelvic pain (1). Their FIGO stages ranged from I-IVB, and pathological examination revealed that all cases were low-grade vaginal endometrial stromal sarcoma. Only four cases had immunohistochemistry results. Three of these cases were positive for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and CD10, and negative for desmin. Further results are shown in Table 1 . Twelve patients had received surgery (local excision, total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH), or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO)). Five had received chemotherapy, three had received radiotherapy, and three had received hormonal therapy. During the follow-up period [32 (9–96) months], seven patients had no evidence of disease, three patients died of this disease, two patients were lost to follow-up, and one patient was alive with this disease. The three patients who died had advanced clinical stages (IVA/IVB). Five patients had a documented recurrence, including four with an advanced clinical stage (greater than stage III), and one with stage I. Among them, two patients died; two patients had no evidence of disease, and one patient was alive with disease ( Table 1 ). Table 1 Clinical pathological details of 13 patients from previous studies. Table 1 First author Age symptom sites Tumor size FIGO stage Grade Treatment follow-up length Recurrence Histochemistry Endometriosis 1. Wang [ 21 ] 40 VM,VD Left part of vagina 5cm IVA LGESS Pelvic external radiotherapy + hormone therapy DOD,12 months – Unknown – 2. Wang [ 21 ] 32 VM Right, lower one third of vagina 1.5cm I LGESS Local wide excision + TAH + BSO NED,21 months – Unknown – 3. Thomas [ 6 ] 32 VM Right lateral vaginal wall 2.5cm I LGESS local exision + TAH + BSO NED,3 years + Unknown – 4. Sanverdi [ 26 ] 46 VB posterior fornix 7cm II LGESS TAH + BSO + partial vaginectomy NED,22 months – ER(+), PR(+), CD10(+), desmin (-), and caldesmon (-). + 5. Masand [ 4 ] 52 pelvic mass Pelvis,rouond ligament,vagina Unknown IVB LGESS surgical treatment + chemotherapy + radiation therapy DOD, 96months + Unknown + 6. Masand [ 4 ] 51 unknown Vagina unknown I-II？ LGESS surgical treatment Lost follow-up Unknown Unknown – 7. Masand [ 4 ] 40 VB Vagina,pelvis Unknown III LGESS surgical treatment + hormone therapy + chemotherapy AWD, 9months + Unknown – 8. Masand [ 4 ] 44 VB Vagina,colon unknow IVA LGESS Surgical treatment + chemotherapy DOD,36months + Unknown + 9. Masand [ 4 ] 49 Pelvic pain and VB Ovary,uterine serosa,vagina,urinary bladder,colon,hypogastric LN Unknown IVB LGESS surgical treatment + hormone therapy + chemotherapy NED,84months + Unknown + 10. Liu [ 15 ] 32 VB middle and upper segments of the right posterior vaginal wall 1cm I LGESS hysterectomy, unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (right) and partial vaginectomy + chemotherapy NED,18months – serum AFP, CA125, CA199, CEA, HCG were all negative. CD10(+), ER(+), PR(+), Vimentin (+); desmin(-), muscle actin(-), S-100 protein(-) – 11. Corpa [ 27 ] 40 VM Vaginal nodule 2cm I LGESS local excision NED,38months – CD10(+), ER(+),PR(+), Desmin(-), muscle actin(-), S-100 protein(-), cytokeratin stains(-) – 12. Ross [ 28 ] 57 VB Vaginal apex 8cm II LGESS Local excision + radiotherapy Unknown Unknown Unknown + 13. Kondi [ 29 ] 45 VB Posterior vaginal wall 2cm II LGESS Local excision NED,36 months – Vementine(+) Unknown VM, vaginal mass. VD, vaginal discharge. H, hysterectomy. BSO, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. DOD, die of disease. NED, no evidence of disease. AWD, alive with disease. TAH, total abdominal hysterectomy. Clinical pathological details of 13 patients from previous studies. VM, vaginal mass. VD, vaginal discharge. H, hysterectomy. BSO, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. DOD, die of disease. NED, no evidence of disease. AWD, alive with disease. TAH, total abdominal hysterectomy.

A computerized literature search was performed to identify relevant studies reported in the English language in the Medline and EMBASE databases. Since the terms “high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma” and “low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma” have been replaced by “undifferentiated sarcoma”, and “endometrial stromal sarcoma” respectively [ 3 ], the following keywords were employed: ‘vaginal endometrial stromal sarcoma’,’ endometriosis malignant transformation’, and ‘vaginal sarcoma’. A total of 13 cases were found. Their symptoms, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis were summarized and analyzed in this review.

VESS is a very rare disease without typical symptoms. Pathological examination is needed in order to make an accurate diagnosis. Surgery is highly recommended, and different adjuvant therapies should be adopted cautiously because of their inconclusive roles. Conservative surgery plus adjuvant hormonal therapy may be a good choice for patients at early disease stages, especially for women with fertility requirements. Exploring drugs according to the mechanism of the disease could lead to other treatment options. Tumor stage and expression of hormonal receptors may be prognostic factors of this disease. Further studies are needed because of the limited number of reported VESS cases.

VESS has a high rate of recurrence. The rate of recurrence in our study was 38.5%. Clinically, symptoms of ESS are atypical. The diagnosis of VESS depends on pathological examination after excluding metastatic endometrial stromal sarcoma. Its treatment varies in different medical centers. Endometriosis may be one mechanism of VESS [ 4 ]. It has been estimated that almost 1% of endometrioses may become malignant [ 5 ], with 25% of endometriosis-related malignancies found in areas outside the ovaries such as the recto-vaginal septum or abdominal wall [ 6 ], and 3.6%–11.1% of these malignancies detected in the vagina [ 7 ]. Vaginal mass and vaginal bleeding were common initial symptoms. Because of its atypical symptoms, pathological examination was the main basis of VESS diagnosis. Furthermore, it must be diagnosed after excluding metastatic endometrial stromal sarcoma [ 8 ]. VESS is mostly low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. Microscopically, it reveals bland oval cells surrounding arterioles resembling endometrial spiral arterioles with no nuclear atypia or pleomorphism ( Fig. 1 ) [ 2 ]. The histological morphology of VESS is very similar to some other tumors. Therefore, a comprehensive analysis of multiple immunohistochemical markers, such as desmin, SMA, CD34, CD117, Ki67, VIM, EMA, BCL2, CK, S100, caldesmon, calponin, CD10, ER, PR, STAT6, CD99, and cyclin D is needed to differentiate it from other disease. In low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma, ER, PR, CD10, and vimentin are usually positive ( Fig. 2 ) [ 3 , 9 ]. When there is epithelial differentiation, CK is usually positive, and when there is smooth muscle differentiation, muscle markers are usually positive. Genetic testing is a promising tool in the diagnosis of ESS, especially for those tumors which lack typical morphologic features. It was reported that the JAZFl·SUZl2 fusion gene was positive in 30.8％ of low-grade ESS cases, and the YWHAE-FAM22 fusion gene was positive in 12.5％ of high-grade ESS cases [ 10 ]. This genetic testing could also be applied in the diagnosis of VESS. Fig. 1 Vaginal endometrial stromal sarcoma. (a) A cellular neoplasm composed of bland oval cells surrounding arterioles resembling endometrial spiral arterioles (hematoxylin and eosin stain, *200 magnification). (b) A higher magnification microphotograph showing the spindle cells surrounding a blood vessel (hematoxylin and eosin stain,*400 magnification). Fig. 1 Fig. 2 Immunohistochemical staining of tumor cells. Immunohistochemical staining (×100) shows that the tumor cells were positive for CD10 (A), estrogen receptor (B), progesterone receptor (C) and vimentin (D). Fig. 2 Vaginal endometrial stromal sarcoma. (a) A cellular neoplasm composed of bland oval cells surrounding arterioles resembling endometrial spiral arterioles (hematoxylin and eosin stain, *200 magnification). (b) A higher magnification microphotograph showing the spindle cells surrounding a blood vessel (hematoxylin and eosin stain,*400 magnification). Immunohistochemical staining of tumor cells. Immunohistochemical staining (×100) shows that the tumor cells were positive for CD10 (A), estrogen receptor (B), progesterone receptor (C) and vimentin (D). Because of the rarity of VESS, there is no consensus on its treatment. Treatment often follows the guidelines for uterine ESS. For those with early stage disease or fertility requirements, excision of local lesions is usually performed. It was reported that one patient with uterine ESS achieved a successful pregnancy after hysteroscopic resection of the tumor [ 11 ]. For those with advanced clinical stage disease, TAH and BSO are usually performed. However, whether or not to retain the ovaries was controversial in premenopausal women. Some experts argued that BSO should be performed on all patients, while others felt that ovarian-sparing surgery was safe in young patients at early disease stages according to a population-based analysis of ESS. Furthermore, BSO did not appear to affect the time to recurrence or overall survival in stage I low-grade ESS [ 5 , 12 ]. Adjuvant therapy incorporated radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy. Some argued that surgery and radiotherapy was the most effective treatment for ESS [ 13 ], while others thought that radiotherapy could only prevent local recurrence but was not beneficial for survival rate [ 13 ]. In our study, three patients (Nos. 1,5,12) received radiotherapy. Among them, two died due to advanced stage disease (Nos. 1,5) and one (No. 12) with early stage disease was lost to follow-up. Chemotherapy drugs in ESS included cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, ifosfamide, epirubicin, and others [ 14 ]. In our study, oxaliplatin, docetaxel [ 15 ], and gemcitabine alone or in combination with docetaxel [ 4 ] were used. However, the effect of these drugs was not carefully evaluated. In our study, five patients (Nos. 5, 7-10) had single-agent or combined chemotherapy. Four (Nos. 5,7,8,9) of them had a recurrence. Finally, two of them (Nos. 1,8) died, two (Nos. 9,10) had no evidence of disease, and one (No. 7) was alive with disease. Hormonal therapy was reported to have a favorable survival outcome in ER/PR positive ESS [ 16 ]. Mizuno reported three out of six patients with residual or recurrent ESS had a partial response after six months of hormonal therapy [ 17 ]. Yamazaki reported a higher response rate was attained with hormonal therapy (85.7%) in 11 ESS patients with initial recurrence of disease [ 14 ]. Hormonal therapy was also used as an alternative treatment for patients with fertility requirements. One woman with uterine ESS delivered a live-born male neonate at 34 gestational weeks. The patient had been on megestrol acetate therapy for 8 years before cessation to achieve pregnancy. She was then referred to a reproductive endocrinologist to hasten conception but achieved spontaneous pregnancy [ 18 ]. In our study, 3 out of 13 patients received hormonal therapy. One patient (No. 1) with stage IV disease died. One patient (No. 7) was alive with stage III disease, and one (No. 9, stage IVB) had no evidence of disease. Some drugs targeting mechanisms of ESS could be novel treatment methods which could also be applied in VESS. Endometriosis is connected with angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis, and neurogenesis, which is related to inflammation [ 19 ]. Mizuno evaluated the effects of long-term, high-dose medroxyprogesterone with aspirin and observed no thromboembolic complications over a median duration of 63 months [ 17 ]. Although the role of aspirin in preventing endometriosis-related malignancy was not evaluated in this study, it may have some effect due to its anti-inflammatory action. Since unopposed estrogens, type II diabetes, and obesity are risk factors of malignant transformation of endometriosis [ 20 , 21 ], and the insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I receptor family could stimulate DNA synthesis and cell proliferation, anti-insulin resistance drugs might help reduce the risk of malignant transformation of endometriosis [ 11 ]. Because follicle-stimulating hormonal receptor (FSHR) is reported to be expressed selectively on the surface of blood vessels in soft tissue sarcomas including ESS [ 23 ], FSHR could be a potential target for tumor imaging examination and therapy [ 23 ]. Low-grade ESS is often associated with JAZF1-SUZ12 (formerly JAZF1-JJAZ1) fusion gene re-arrangement and Wnt signaling [ 24 ]. Overexpression of the JAZF1-SUZ12 fusion protein in 293 T cells could destabilize Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 and decrease histone methyltransferase activity through the Wnt pathway. Therefore, exploring drugs that target the Wnt pathway may lead to a promising treatment. In our study, patients who died of VESS all had advanced stage disease (Nos. 1,5,8), which was consistent with Ngan’s study [ 25 ]. Therefore, tumor stage seems to be a prognostic factor of VESS. Hormonal receptors such as ER and PR were expressed in more than half of the ESS tissues in Park’s study of 51 patients, and positive hormonal receptors were significantly associated with improved overall survival [ 17 ]. In our study, three patients with positive ER and PR had no evidence of disease. Therefore, hormonal receptor expression could be another prognostic factor of VESS.

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is a rare neoplasm, accounting for only 0.2% of all uterine malignancies [ 1 ]. It is even less likely to be found in extra-uterine sites such as the vagina. Vaginal ESS (VESS) could easily be misdiagnosed because of its rarity and atypical symptoms, and has a very high risk of recurrence, estimated at 50% [ 2 ]. Unfortunately, there are no treatment guidelines available. In order to further our understanding of VESS, we conducted this review.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.