Surgical, Clinical, and Functional Outcomes in Patients with Rectosigmoid Endometriosis in the Gray Zone: 13-Year Long-Term Follow-up

Observational OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 40 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This 13-year follow-up study evaluated surgical, clinical, and functional outcomes in patients with rectosigmoid endometriosis, providing long-term data on disease management.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare long-term surgical, clinical, and functional outcomes between conservative and radical surgery in patients with rectosigmoid endometriosis (RSE) and preoperative intermediate risk of segmental resection. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: Endometriosis tertiary level referral center, St. Orsola Academic Hospital, Bologna, Italy. PATIENTS: Three hundred and ninety-two patients with RSE presented for complete macroscopic surgical excision between January 2004 and January 2017. INTERVENTION: Assessment of laparoscopic bowel shaving, discoid excision, or segmental resection for the treatment of RSE. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The 392 patients were divided into 3 groups according to surgical technique: shaving (n = 297; 75.8%), discoid excision (n = 33; 8.4%), and segmental resection (n = 62; 15.8%). Preoperative characteristics, surgical data, short- and long-term complications, and rates of proven and suspected recurrence were assessed. The segmental resection group had a higher rate of short-term complications compared with the discoid and shaving groups (17.7% vs 9.1% vs 5.4%, respectively; p = .004). The median follow-up time was 43 months (range, 12-163 months). Suspected and proven RSE recurrence rates showed no statistically significant differences among the 3 groups. There also were no significant differences concerning the rate of de novo chronic constipation and urinary retention. CONCLUSION: To date, there is no consensus regarding the choice between radical (segmental resection) or conservative (shaving, discoid excision) surgical management for RSE, particularly for patients with preoperative intermediate risk of bowel segmental resection (the gray zone). Our data suggest that conservative surgery is preferred over radical surgery in patients with RSE in the gray zone risk category, resulting in similar suspected and proven RSE recurrence rates and associated with fewer short-term complications.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Rectal Diseases Sigmoid Diseases Adult Adult Constipation Constipation Constipation Constipation Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Digestive System Surgical Procedures Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Female

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (28)

Cited by (40)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-19T06:17:24.038039+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:23:18.497579+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-19T06:34:38.229974+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK