Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic approach in obese patients with endometriosis: a multivariable regression analysis

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-06-12

Laparoscopic endometriosis excision in obese women is feasible and safe, though it involves slightly longer operative times and higher conversion rates compared to non-obese patients.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-12 · read from full text

This study retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data from 1,230 consecutive women scheduled for complete laparoscopic removal of macroscopic endometriotic lesions (2012–2018), comparing obese (BMI ≥ 30) versus non-obese groups using operative time, laparotomic conversion rates, complications, and hospital stay, with multivariable regression to adjust for confounders. Among the cohort, 91 obese women (7.4%) underwent surgery, and while univariate analyses showed differences in factors such as age, severe endometriosis rates, ASA class, and types of procedures, only operative time differed significantly between groups. After adjustment, increased operating time remained significant (coefficient 13.389; 95% CI 1.716–25.060), and the authors reported feasibility and safety in their tertiary care setting, with only slight increases in operative time and conversion rate. Limitations include the observational retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from a single referral center. This paper is centrally about endometriosis—evaluating feasibility and safety of laparoscopic excision in obese patients.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic excision of endometriotic lesions in obese women.MethodsRetrospective analysis of prospectively collected data involving consecutive women scheduled for complete laparoscopic removal of macroscopic endometriotic lesions between January 2012 and November 2018. Operative time, laparotomic conversion rates, complication rates, and length of hospital stay were recorded.ResultsOne thousand two hundred thirty women were enrolled and divided into two main groups, according to the World Health Organization classification of obesity, obese (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2) and non-obese (body mass index < 30 kg/m2). During the study period, 91 (7.4% of overall study cohort) obese women underwent surgery. At univariate analyses, significant differences between the two groups were found in terms of age, rates of severe endometriosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification ≥ III, and different surgical procedures. Significant differences in terms of median operative time [125 (interquartile range (IQR) 85-165) in obese group vs 110 min (IQR 75-155) in non-obese group, P = 0.04] were observed. There were no significant differences between the obese and non-obese groups with respect to the other variables of interest. After adjusted multivariable regression models for potential confounders, difference in operating time (coefficient of 13.389; 95% CI 1.716, 25.060) was still found to be significant.ConclusionIn our tertiary care referral center, laparoscopic removal of endometriosis is feasible and safe, except for a slight increase of operative time and conversion rate.
Full text 8,816 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic excision of endometriotic lesions in obese women.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data involving consecutive women scheduled for complete laparoscopic removal of macroscopic endometriotic lesions between January 2012 and November 2018. Operative time, laparotomic conversion rates, complication rates, and length of hospital stay were recorded.

Results

One thousand two hundred thirty women were enrolled and divided into two main groups, according to the World Health Organization classification of obesity, obese (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2) and non-obese (body mass index < 30 kg/m2). During the study period, 91 (7.4% of overall study cohort) obese women underwent surgery. At univariate analyses, significant differences between the two groups were found in terms of age, rates of severe endometriosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification ≥ III, and different surgical procedures. Significant differences in terms of median operative time [125 (interquartile range (IQR) 85–165) in obese group vs 110 min (IQR 75–155) in non-obese group, P = 0.04] were observed. There were no significant differences between the obese and non-obese groups with respect to the other variables of interest. After adjusted multivariable regression models for potential confounders, difference in operating time (coefficient of 13.389; 95% CI 1.716, 25.060) was still found to be significant.

Conclusion

In our tertiary care referral center, laparoscopic removal of endometriosis is feasible and safe, except for a slight increase of operative time and conversion rate. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Giudice LC, Kao LC (2004) Endometriosis. Lancet 364:1789–1799. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17403-5 Holdsworth-Carson SJ, Dior UP, Colgrave EM et al (2018) The association of body mass index with endometriosis and disease severity in women with pain. J Endometriosis Pelvic Pain Disord 10:79–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/2284026518773939 Vitonis AF, Baer HJ, Hankinson SE et al (2010) A prospective study of body size during childhood and early adulthood and the incidence of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 25:1325–1334. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deq039 Liu Y, Zhang W (2017) Association between body mass index and endometriosis risk: a meta-analysis. Oncotarget. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.14916 Seracchioli R, Mabrouk M, Guerrini M et al (2008) Dyschezia and posterior deep infiltrating endometriosis: analysis of 360 cases. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15:695–699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2008.07.005 Mabrouk M, Montanari G, Di Donato N et al (2012) What is the impact on sexual function of laparoscopic treatment and subsequent combined oral contraceptive therapy in women with deep infiltrating endometriosis? J Sexual Med 9:770–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02593.x Villa G, Mabrouk M, Guerrini M et al (2007) Relationship between site and size of bladder endometriotic nodules and severity of dysuria. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14:628–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2007.04.015 Di Donato N, Montanari G, Benfenati A et al (2014) Prevalence of adenomyosis in women undergoing surgery for endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 181:289–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.08.016 MacDonald KG (2003) Overview of the epidemiology of obesity and the early history of procedures to remedy morbid obesity. Arch Surg 138:357–360. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.138.4.357 Hediger ML, Hartnett HJ, Louis GMB (2005) Association of endometriosis with body size and figure. Fertil Steril 84:1366–1374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.029 Heard ME, Melnyk SB, Simmen FA et al (2016) High-fat diet promotion of endometriosis in an immunocompetent mouse model is associated with altered peripheral and ectopic lesion redox and inflammatory status. Endocrinology 157:2870–2882. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2016-1092 Scheib SA, Tanner E, Green IC, Fader AN (2014) Laparoscopy in the morbidly obese: physiologic considerations and surgical techniques to optimize success. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 21:182–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2013.09.009 Camanni M, Bonino L, Delpiano EM et al (2010) Laparoscopy and body mass index: feasibility and outcome in obese patients treated for gynecologic diseases. J Min Invasive Gynecol 17:576–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2010.04.002 Halder GE, Salemi JL, Hart S, Mikhail E (2017) Association between obesity and perioperative morbidity in open versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 23:146–150. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000382 Blikkendaal MD, Schepers EM, van Zwet EW et al (2015) Hysterectomy in very obese and morbidly obese patients: a systematic review with cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Arch Gynecol Obstet 292:723–738. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-015-3680-7 Uccella S, Bonzini M, Palomba S et al (2016) Impact of obesity on surgical treatment for endometrial cancer: a multicenter study comparing laparoscopy vs open surgery, with propensity-matched analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 23:53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2015.08.007 Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae Seracchioli R, Ferrini G, Montanari G et al (2015) Does laparoscopic shaving for deep infiltrating endometriosis alter intestinal function? A prospective study. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 55:357–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12358 Mabrouk M, Raimondo D, Altieri M et al (2019) Surgical, clinical, and functional outcomes in patients with rectosigmoid endometriosis in the gray zone: 13-year long-term follow-up. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 26:1110–1116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2018.08.031 Seracchioli R, Mannini D, Colombo FM et al (2002) Cystoscopy-assisted laparoscopic resection of extramucosal bladder endometriosis. J Endourol 16:663–666. https://doi.org/10.1089/089277902761403014 Seracchioli R, Raimondo D, Di Donato N et al (2015) Histological evaluation of ureteral involvement in women with deep infiltrating endometriosis: analysis of a large series. Hum Reprod 30:833–839. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deu360 Tomescu DR, Popescu M, Dima SO et al (2017) Obesity is associated with decreased lung compliance and hypercapnia during robotic assisted surgery. J Clin Monit Comput 31:85–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-016-9831-y Wysham WZ, Kim KH, Roberts JM et al (2015) Obesity and perioperative pulmonary complications in robotic gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 213:33.e1–33.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.033 Meininger D, Zwissler B, Byhahn C et al (2006) Impact of overweight and pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamics and oxygenation during prolonged laparoscopic surgery. World J Surg 30:520–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0133-7 Ng M, Fleming T, Robinson M et al (2014) Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 384:766–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60460-8 Yi KW, Shin J-H, Park MS et al (2009) Association of body mass index with severity of endometriosis in Korean women. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105:39–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.11.001 Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions Conceptualization: DR. Methodology: IR, MP. Formal analysis and investigation: GM, EDE, MM. Writing—original draft preparation: DR, AA, GB. Writing—review and editing: MM, SDF. Supervision: RS, SD. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest and nothing to disclose. Informed consent Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study at time of preoperative evaluation. Additional information Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. The study was registered on ClinicalTrial.gov with the following ID number: NCT0389935 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03899935). Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Raimondo, D., Raimondo, I., Degli Esposti, E. et al. Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic approach in obese patients with endometriosis: a multivariable regression analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 302, 665–670 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05629-9 Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05629-9

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Laparoscopy Obesity Adult Endometriosis Feasibility Studies Female Humans Laparoscopy Obesity Regression Analysis Retrospective Studies

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (26)

Cited by (3)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-11T06:15:56.568227+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:21:59.141895+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK