Effect of laser-assisted zona thinning, during assisted reproduction, on pregnancy outcome in women with endometriosis: randomized controlled trial

article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 7 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite+body, 2026-06-10

Laser-assisted zona thinning improved ICSI-ET implantation and pregnancy rates in women with endometriosis compared to controls.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 · read from full text

This randomized controlled trial studied whether laser-assisted zona pellucida thinning applied before embryo transfer during ICSI-ET improves pregnancy outcomes in infertile women with known endometriosis undergoing ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval, with patients randomized to receive embryo transfer either with laser-assisted hatching (n = 158) or without (n = 150). Baseline characteristics, hormonal profiles, stimulation parameters, embryo numbers, and transferred embryo numbers were comparable between groups. The laser-assisted hatching group had significantly higher implantation rate (odds ratio 1.86) and significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio 1.79), with p values of 0.002 and 0.022, respectively. An Editorial Expression of Concern was published for this article, indicating a caveat regarding the paper’s integrity. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it evaluates laser-assisted zona thinning during ICSI-ET to improve implantation and clinical pregnancy rates in women with endometriosis.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the ICSI-ET outcomes in patients with endometriosis with or without laser-assisted zona pellucida thinning.DesignRandomized controlled trial.SettingThe study was conducted in the Obstetrics & Gynecology Department, Cairo University hospital, and two private IVF centers in Cairo & Beni-Suif from July 2015 to January 2017 upon infertile and known endometriosis patients who planned to do ICSI-ET.InterventionsBefore randomization, all patients received the same ovarian stimulation preparation, oocyte retrieval procedures, and the same intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedures. After randomization, laser-assisted hatching was performed only for embryos of 158 patients, while the other group (n = 150) no laser-assisted hatching was made. The verification of pregnancy was achieved by the serum hCG concentration 14 days after the embryo transfer, and the clinical pregnancy was confirmed 2 weeks later by the presence of gestational sac with pulsating fetal pole on vaginal ultrasonography.MeasurementsThe main outcome measures were the clinical pregnancy rate and the clinical implantation rate.Main resultsBoth groups were comparable with regard their baseline characteristics, baseline hormonal profile, the ovarian stimulation characteristics, and the ovulation characteristics. The mean number of embryos developed per patient and the mean transferred number of embryos per patient were comparable between groups (p value > 0.05). The implantation rate was significantly higher (p value 0.002) in the study group than the control group with an odds ratio of 1.86 (CI 95% 1.24-2.80) and NNT 13.81 (CI 95% 8.35-39.94). The clinical pregnancy rate, was significantly (p value 0.022) higher in the study group than in the control group with an odds ratio of 1.79 (CI 95% 1.05-3.06) and NNT 9.57 (CI 95% 5.03-98.99).ConclusionThat laser-assisted hatching by thinning of the zona pellucida may be a suitable method to improve the ICSI-ET outcomes, in term of the implantation and the pregnancy rates, in cases of endometriosis.Clinical trial registrationPan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR), http://www.pactr.org/ATMWeb/appmanager/atm/atmregistry?dar=true&tNo=PACTR201502001022393 , PACTR201602001467322.
Full text 8,278 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Objective To compare the ICSI-ET outcomes in patients with endometriosis with or without laser-assisted zona pellucida thinning. Design Randomized controlled trial. Setting The study was conducted in the Obstetrics & Gynecology Department, Cairo University hospital, and two private IVF centers in Cairo & Beni-Suif from July 2015 to January 2017 upon infertile and known endometriosis patients who planned to do ICSI-ET. Interventions Before randomization, all patients received the same ovarian stimulation preparation, oocyte retrieval procedures, and the same intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedures. After randomization, laser-assisted hatching was performed only for embryos of 158 patients, while the other group (n = 150) no laser-assisted hatching was made. The verification of pregnancy was achieved by the serum hCG concentration 14 days after the embryo transfer, and the clinical pregnancy was confirmed 2 weeks later by the presence of gestational sac with pulsating fetal pole on vaginal ultrasonography. Measurements The main outcome measures were the clinical pregnancy rate and the clinical implantation rate. Main results Both groups were comparable with regard their baseline characteristics, baseline hormonal profile, the ovarian stimulation characteristics, and the ovulation characteristics. The mean number of embryos developed per patient and the mean transferred number of embryos per patient were comparable between groups (p value > 0.05). The implantation rate was significantly higher (p value 0.002) in the study group than the control group with an odds ratio of 1.86 (CI 95% 1.24–2.80) and NNT 13.81 (CI 95% 8.35–39.94). The clinical pregnancy rate, was significantly (p value 0.022) higher in the study group than in the control group with an odds ratio of 1.79 (CI 95% 1.05–3.06) and NNT 9.57 (CI 95% 5.03–98.99).

Conclusion

That laser-assisted hatching by thinning of the zona pellucida may be a suitable method to improve the ICSI-ET outcomes, in term of the implantation and the pregnancy rates, in cases of endometriosis. Clinical trial registration Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR), http://www.pactr.org/ATMWeb/appmanager/atm/atmregistry?dar=true&tNo=PACTR201502001022393, PACTR201602001467322. Similar content being viewed by others Change history 10 October 2023 An Editorial Expression of Concern to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07236-w

References

Macer ML, Taylor HS (2012) Endometriosis and infertility: a review of the pathogenesis and treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 39:535–549 Senapati S, Barnhart K (2011) Managing endometriosis-associated infertility. Clin Obstet Gynecol 54:720–726 Yoo JH, Cha SH, Park CW, KimJY Yang KM, Song IO et al (2011) Anti-Mullerian hormone is a better predictor of ovarian response than FSH and age in IVF patients with endometriosis. Clin Exp Reprod Med 38(4):222–227 Garrido N, Navarro J, Remohi J, Simon C, Pellicer A (2000) Follicular hormonal environment and embryo quality in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod Update 6:67–74 Lin XN, Wei ML, Tong XM, Xu WH, Zhou F, Huang QX et al (2012) Outcome of in vitro fertilization in endometriosis-associated infertility: a 5-year database cohort study. Chin Med J (Engl) 125:2688–2693 Suzuki T, Izumi S, Matsubayashi H, Awaji H, Yoshikata K, Makino T (2005) Impact of ovarian endometrioma on oocytes and pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 83(4):908–913 Prieto L, Quesada JF, Cambero O, Pacheco A, Pellicer A, Codoceo R et al (2012) Analysis of follicular fluid and serum markers of oxidative stress in women with infertility related to endometriosis. Fertil Steril 98:126–130 Habibzadeh V, Reza Mirshekari T, Ganjizadegan A (2011) Study of laser assisted hatching for fertility outcome in intra cytoplasmic sperm injection and IVF cycles. J Lasers Med Sci 2(2):54–58 Edi-osagie E, Hooper L, Seif MW (2003) The impact of assisted hatching on live birth and outcomes of assisted conception. Hum Reprod 18(9):1828–1835 Blake DA, Forsberg AS, Johansson BR, Wikl M (2001) Laser zona pellucida thinning—alternative approach to assisted hatching. Hum Reprod 16:1959–1964 Mantoudis E, Podsially BT, Gorgy A, Venkat G, Craft IL (2001) A comparison between quartz, partial and total laser assisted hatching in selected infertility patients. Hum Reprod 16:2182–2186 Padula F, Capriglione S, Iaconianni P, Gatti S, Lippa A, Minutolo SE, Giannarelli D, Giorlandino C (2017) Laser-assisted hatching of human embryos: may two alternative approaches (thinning versus drilling) impact on implant rate? Lasers Med Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2242-6 ([Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 28547074) Nadir Çray H, Bener F, Karagenç L, Ulug U, Bahçeci M (2005) Impact of assisted hatching on ART outcome in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 20(9):2546–2549 Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K et al (2009) The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Glossary on ART Terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod 24:2683–2687 Borges E Jr, Braga DPAF, Setti AS, Vingris LS, Figueira RCS, Iaconelli A Jr (2015) Endometriosis affects oocyte morphology in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. JBRA Assist Reprod 19(4):235–240 Opoien HK, Fedorcsak P, Omland AK, Abyholm T, Bjercke S, Ertzeid G et al (2012) In vitro fertilization is a successful treatment in endometriosis-associated infertility. Fertil Steril 97:912–918 Barnhart K, Dunsmoor-Su R, Coutifaris C (2002) Effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 77:1148–1155 Dominguez F, Pellicer A, Simon C (2003) The chemokine connection: hormonal and embryonic regulation at the human maternal-embryonic interface—a review. Placenta 24:S48–S55 Cohen J, Alikani M (2013) Evidence-based medicine and its application in clinical preimplantation embryology. Reprod Biomed Online 27:547–561 Huai L, Avner H, Gerald M, Matthew A (2009) A retroprospective study comparing three different assisted hatching techniques. Fertil Steril 91:1323–1325

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Dr. Emad R. H. Issak (ClinAmygate) for his efforts in statistical analysis and editing of this manuscript. Author information Authors and Affiliations Contributions AE, HA, AMN, MAB, TT, SS, FH, and EZ contributed to conception of the idea and design. AMN, MAB, FH, and EZ administered the study and collected the data. Validation was performed by AE, HA, MAB, TT, SS, and EZ. Analysis was carried out by AMN, FH, and EZ. AE, HA, AMN, MAB, and FH drafted the manuscript. Revision of the final manuscript was carried out by AE, HA, AMN, MAB, TT, SS, FH, and EZ. Corresponding author Ethics declarations Conflict of interest Adel M. Nada declares that he has no conflict of interest. Amr El-Noury declares that he has no conflict of interest. Hesham Al-Inany declares that he has no conflict of interest. Mamdouh Bibars declares that he has no conflict of interest. Tamer Taha declares that he has no conflict of interest. Sameh Salama declares that he has no conflict of interest. Fatma Hassan declares that she has no conflict of interest. Eman Zein declares that she has no conflict of interest. Funding This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector. Ethical approval All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Nada, A.M., El-Noury, A., Al-Inany, H. et al. Effect of laser-assisted zona thinning, during assisted reproduction, on pregnancy outcome in women with endometriosis: randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 297, 521–528 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4604-5 Received: Accepted: Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4604-5

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Embryo Implantation Embryo Implantation Endometriosis Endometriosis Infertility, Female Lasers Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic Zona Pellucida Adult Chorionic Gonadotropin Chorionic Gonadotropin Embryo Transfer Endometriosis Female Humans Infertility, Female Infertility, Female Oocyte Retrieval Oocyte Retrieval Ovulation Induction

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (20)

Cited by (7)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-13T09:25:22.628771+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:20:07.505861+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK