{"paper_id":"f11de68b-4986-4613-9e25-9a5843cbd461","body_text":"Abstract\nObjective\nTo compare the ICSI-ET outcomes in patients with endometriosis with or without laser-assisted zona pellucida thinning.\nDesign\nRandomized controlled trial.\nSetting\nThe study was conducted in the Obstetrics & Gynecology Department, Cairo University hospital, and two private IVF centers in Cairo & Beni-Suif from July 2015 to January 2017 upon infertile and known endometriosis patients who planned to do ICSI-ET.\nInterventions\nBefore randomization, all patients received the same ovarian stimulation preparation, oocyte retrieval procedures, and the same intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedures. After randomization, laser-assisted hatching was performed only for embryos of 158 patients, while the other group (n = 150) no laser-assisted hatching was made. The verification of pregnancy was achieved by the serum hCG concentration 14 days after the embryo transfer, and the clinical pregnancy was confirmed 2 weeks later by the presence of gestational sac with pulsating fetal pole on vaginal ultrasonography.\nMeasurements\nThe main outcome measures were the clinical pregnancy rate and the clinical implantation rate.\nMain results\nBoth groups were comparable with regard their baseline characteristics, baseline hormonal profile, the ovarian stimulation characteristics, and the ovulation characteristics. The mean number of embryos developed per patient and the mean transferred number of embryos per patient were comparable between groups (p value > 0.05). The implantation rate was significantly higher (p value 0.002) in the study group than the control group with an odds ratio of 1.86 (CI 95% 1.24–2.80) and NNT 13.81 (CI 95% 8.35–39.94). The clinical pregnancy rate, was significantly (p value 0.022) higher in the study group than in the control group with an odds ratio of 1.79 (CI 95% 1.05–3.06) and NNT 9.57 (CI 95% 5.03–98.99).\nConclusion\nThat laser-assisted hatching by thinning of the zona pellucida may be a suitable method to improve the ICSI-ET outcomes, in term of the implantation and the pregnancy rates, in cases of endometriosis.\nClinical trial registration\nPan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR), http://www.pactr.org/ATMWeb/appmanager/atm/atmregistry?dar=true&tNo=PACTR201502001022393, PACTR201602001467322.\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nChange history\n10 October 2023\nAn Editorial Expression of Concern to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-023-07236-w\nReferences\nMacer ML, Taylor HS (2012) Endometriosis and infertility: a review of the pathogenesis and treatment of endometriosis-associated infertility. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 39:535–549\nSenapati S, Barnhart K (2011) Managing endometriosis-associated infertility. Clin Obstet Gynecol 54:720–726\nYoo JH, Cha SH, Park CW, KimJY Yang KM, Song IO et al (2011) Anti-Mullerian hormone is a better predictor of ovarian response than FSH and age in IVF patients with endometriosis. Clin Exp Reprod Med 38(4):222–227\nGarrido N, Navarro J, Remohi J, Simon C, Pellicer A (2000) Follicular hormonal environment and embryo quality in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod Update 6:67–74\nLin XN, Wei ML, Tong XM, Xu WH, Zhou F, Huang QX et al (2012) Outcome of in vitro fertilization in endometriosis-associated infertility: a 5-year database cohort study. Chin Med J (Engl) 125:2688–2693\nSuzuki T, Izumi S, Matsubayashi H, Awaji H, Yoshikata K, Makino T (2005) Impact of ovarian endometrioma on oocytes and pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 83(4):908–913\nPrieto L, Quesada JF, Cambero O, Pacheco A, Pellicer A, Codoceo R et al (2012) Analysis of follicular fluid and serum markers of oxidative stress in women with infertility related to endometriosis. Fertil Steril 98:126–130\nHabibzadeh V, Reza Mirshekari T, Ganjizadegan A (2011) Study of laser assisted hatching for fertility outcome in intra cytoplasmic sperm injection and IVF cycles. J Lasers Med Sci 2(2):54–58\nEdi-osagie E, Hooper L, Seif MW (2003) The impact of assisted hatching on live birth and outcomes of assisted conception. Hum Reprod 18(9):1828–1835\nBlake DA, Forsberg AS, Johansson BR, Wikl M (2001) Laser zona pellucida thinning—alternative approach to assisted hatching. Hum Reprod 16:1959–1964\nMantoudis E, Podsially BT, Gorgy A, Venkat G, Craft IL (2001) A comparison between quartz, partial and total laser assisted hatching in selected infertility patients. Hum Reprod 16:2182–2186\nPadula F, Capriglione S, Iaconianni P, Gatti S, Lippa A, Minutolo SE, Giannarelli D, Giorlandino C (2017) Laser-assisted hatching of human embryos: may two alternative approaches (thinning versus drilling) impact on implant rate? Lasers Med Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-017-2242-6 ([Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 28547074)\nNadir Çray H, Bener F, Karagenç L, Ulug U, Bahçeci M (2005) Impact of assisted hatching on ART outcome in women with endometriosis. Hum Reprod 20(9):2546–2549\nZegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K et al (2009) The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) Revised Glossary on ART Terminology, 2009. Hum Reprod 24:2683–2687\nBorges E Jr, Braga DPAF, Setti AS, Vingris LS, Figueira RCS, Iaconelli A Jr (2015) Endometriosis affects oocyte morphology in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. JBRA Assist Reprod 19(4):235–240\nOpoien HK, Fedorcsak P, Omland AK, Abyholm T, Bjercke S, Ertzeid G et al (2012) In vitro fertilization is a successful treatment in endometriosis-associated infertility. Fertil Steril 97:912–918\nBarnhart K, Dunsmoor-Su R, Coutifaris C (2002) Effect of endometriosis on in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 77:1148–1155\nDominguez F, Pellicer A, Simon C (2003) The chemokine connection: hormonal and embryonic regulation at the human maternal-embryonic interface—a review. Placenta 24:S48–S55\nCohen J, Alikani M (2013) Evidence-based medicine and its application in clinical preimplantation embryology. Reprod Biomed Online 27:547–561\nHuai L, Avner H, Gerald M, Matthew A (2009) A retroprospective study comparing three different assisted hatching techniques. Fertil Steril 91:1323–1325\nAcknowledgements\nWe would like to acknowledge Dr. Emad R. H. Issak (ClinAmygate) for his efforts in statistical analysis and editing of this manuscript.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nContributions\nAE, HA, AMN, MAB, TT, SS, FH, and EZ contributed to conception of the idea and design. AMN, MAB, FH, and EZ administered the study and collected the data. Validation was performed by AE, HA, MAB, TT, SS, and EZ. Analysis was carried out by AMN, FH, and EZ. AE, HA, AMN, MAB, and FH drafted the manuscript. Revision of the final manuscript was carried out by AE, HA, AMN, MAB, TT, SS, FH, and EZ.\nCorresponding author\nEthics declarations\nConflict of interest\nAdel M. Nada declares that he has no conflict of interest. Amr El-Noury declares that he has no conflict of interest. Hesham Al-Inany declares that he has no conflict of interest. Mamdouh Bibars declares that he has no conflict of interest. Tamer Taha declares that he has no conflict of interest. Sameh Salama declares that he has no conflict of interest. Fatma Hassan declares that she has no conflict of interest. Eman Zein declares that she has no conflict of interest.\nFunding\nThis research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sector.\nEthical approval\nAll procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.\nInformed consent\nInformed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.\nRights and permissions\nAbout this article\nCite this article\nNada, A.M., El-Noury, A., Al-Inany, H. et al. Effect of laser-assisted zona thinning, during assisted reproduction, on pregnancy outcome in women with endometriosis: randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 297, 521–528 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4604-5\nReceived:\nAccepted:\nPublished:\nIssue date:\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4604-5","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}